Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So if we all call Mike Dunford a child raping pedo over and over, it's true and he can do nothing about it.
This faggots entire life is nothing but highly over-exaggerated shit.
"Fraud Youtube Lawyer'? That sounds like defamation.
That by itself is opinion.
Accusing Nick of wire fraud based essentially on nothing, though, is not. That is a clear allegation of violating a specific criminal statute and is defamatory per se.
No, he explicitly said Vic would be ordered to pay the defense's fees, something that is only likely to happen if they win a TCPA motion, and he hasn't even explained how the complaint he obviously either hasn't read or is deliberately being obtuse about fails to state a prima facie claim.
Or just repeating something already said.....or "it's and opinion". But yea the its been going on for years is my favorite one.Now there's a hot fucking take. If I want to libel someone, I just do it over and over again and nobody can sue me! Great advice.
Or just repeating something already said.....or "it's and opinion". But yea the its been going on for years is my favorite one.
Even that doesn't make much sense. There's only a limited time in which the defendants can file a TCPA, and even though their combined legal fees to date might be significant, they're unlikely to come close to approaching Vic's estimated net worth.
Well there is your problem, if they did read more than that POS/Jesus statement they may have to change their minds and that would be a bad thing in their eyes. The fact that none of them knew what the TDMA letter actually did speaks volumes to what they know. IDK I think its kind of scary how much doubling down has been going on, would rather have a lawyer go I made a mistake and here is what we are going to do to fix it than one that is just blind to their own mistakes.Dunford is missing that none of the defendants have said "I heard someone say bla bla bla" which would obviously be protected. Marchi has specifically accused him of assaulting her, although the description isn't of an assault, as has Monica. Ron Toye has not said he's just heard these things, but that he knows them to be a fact.
So for instance if I said I saw someone in a Kiwi Farms thread saying that Dunford is a pederast, that would be true, and unless I went above and beyond that and unreasonably and maliciously asserted its truth, I wouldn't be in much danger of liability over it. If, however, based on just having seen such a baseless allegation, I then spent months posting hundreds of times a day about him being a pederast, inventing elaborate and extravagant exaggerations and details of this, to the point someone had to deliver a defamation mitigation act request hundreds of pages of long to me, and had adopted it as a factual statement of my own, that would be actionable, and that is what Soye did.
Nowhere has Soye said any of this is opinion or just something he heard. He's vouched repeatedly for its truth as a fact and that he knows it to be true personally.
Anyone who read more than the "piece of shit funny ha-ha" shit would know that.
IDK I think its kind of scary how much doubling down has been going on, would rather have a lawyer go I made a mistake and here is what we are going to do to fix it than one that is just blind to their own mistakes.
Now there's a hot fucking take. If I want to libel someone, I just do it over and over again and nobody can sue me! Great advice.
Dunford is missing that none of the defendants have said "I heard someone say bla bla bla" which would obviously be protected. Marchi has specifically accused him of assaulting her, although the description isn't of an assault, as has Monica. Ron Toye has not said he's just heard these things, but that he knows them to be a fact.
So for instance if I said I saw someone in a Kiwi Farms thread saying that Dunford is a pederast, that would be true, and unless I went above and beyond that and unreasonably and maliciously asserted its truth, I wouldn't be in much danger of liability over it. If, however, based on just having seen such a baseless allegation, I then spent months posting hundreds of times a day about him being a pederast, inventing elaborate and extravagant exaggerations and details of this, to the point someone had to deliver a defamation mitigation act request hundreds of pages of long to me, and had adopted it as a factual statement of my own, that would be actionable, and that is what Soye did.
Nowhere has Soye said any of this is opinion or just something he heard. He's vouched repeatedly for its truth as a fact and that he knows it to be true personally.
Anyone who read more than the "piece of shit funny ha-ha" shit would know that.
Today, Law School seems just like It's like J-School. There are very few teachers (and have been very few for a couple decades) that actually teach something other than hard left activism. It's true for Harvard Law, Columbia Journo and down the ladder to community college level paralegals.Well there is your problem, if they did read more than that POS/Jesus statement they may have to change their minds and that would be a bad thing in their eyes. The fact that none of them knew what the TDMA letter actually did speaks volumes to what they know. IDK I think its kind of scary how much doubling down has been going on, would rather have a lawyer go I made a mistake and here is what we are going to do to fix it than one that is just blind to their own mistakes.
The truth is revealed that KickVic won't hesitate to treat their own like shit in case they screw up.
It was Doucette not Dunford who advised Marz and PM.And look where they are at now. With discovery active it's just as good as prima facie at this point, but I have to wonder what the fraudulent emails were about.
Ican't
wait
to
go
to
court
I also don't know why he told Armzgurl and Whoremore to double down. It's not like he can represent them. He'd either die on the plane ride there or when he lays down on his hotel bed without his toy.
Or just doing it so long you become complacent. There was a guy that got crushed by an aircraft spoiler due to not doing a ton of things he should have done but in the end didn't respect the aircraft. And his 16 year AF career ended in seconds.Just not being completely ignorant about any actual fact in the case is apparently screwing up. You can't be poisoned by that forbidden knowledge.
That is very true. Better safe than sorry to avoid it at all cost.Just not being completely ignorant about any actual fact in the case is apparently screwing up. You can't be poisoned by that forbidden knowledge.
Why are people engaging him? Anyone with almost 150,000 tweets is self-important and only wants to hear their own opinions reflected back to them.
So I get Greg is a special case for a lawyer not being able to afford equipment to preserve his life. He also got the great idea of copying the tactic of letting the Kiwis do the internet discovery for them to save on money by using kickvic randos.
That's like noticing a football team playing football and deciding you can just hire some homeless drunks to beat them. I invite them to go searching for facts because in many cases, actually doing that will cause them to realize how fucking vaporous and insubstantial the allegations against Vic really are.
I can't imagine who is following this idiot, your Twitter feed would be clogged with his stupid tweets.His likes and replies per tweet are quite lame, even Nick gets better reactions.
His analytics and are high aimply because of the sheer amount of tweets and replies he puts out.
I haven't been keeping track of him for the past few days, but from what I've seen, it was mostly KickVic and a couple of ISWV idiots with nothing better to do than waste time on twitter who engaged him.