Careercow Max Landis

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I'm no Peter Jordanson psychologist but I'm pretty sure if you were actually abused you wouldn't post about it on fucking Twitter.

Has anything legitimate come out of the MeToo movement? It all seems like bullshit to me.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: juul odour
Has anything legitimate come out of the MeToo movement? It all seems like bullshit to me.
I was going to say Harvey Weinstein, but that slimy motherfucker's paying a $44 million settlement and likely won't be seeing jail.

The only thing MeToo has brought to the table is remind everyone that Hollywood is a den of sex perverts and degenerates, and anybody who'd been paying attention since the fucking 1920s would have already figured that out.
 
No doubt she's chosen her words very carefully (read: manipulatively), but I've heard more than one story about Max's sexual sadism to know that he's got a very fucking questionable understanding of the word consent. One girl I know used the R word specifically. Grain of salt, sure, but I had no reason to doubt her. Girls around town know not to take anything Landis gives you on a night out the same way we knew not to go to Harvey's hotel room for a 'meeting'. Allegedly, of course.

ETA: I'm downright surprised no one has tried to bring charges against him in the past. OR, rather, that we haven't heard about it. It's his Mom doing most of the shielding btw. She's the power in the Landis house nowadays. Which is a shame - professionally she's a fucking hero.

So I suppose this begs the question. Does he force women into these situations? The big problem with the Harvey case is that the defense is the women knew what they were getting into. It was blatantly quid pro quo. He would get them acting roles, and they would give him sex. Prostitution is skeevy as fuck, but its not rape. We can argue if it was morally bad, and I will agree that it was. But I won't say it was rape because that implies a level of force that was clearly absent. It was an abuse of power, but at no point were the women involved compelled by threat or violence to comply with the demands. They wanted something, Weinstein could give it, and they chose to accept his immoral demands. That is immoral. But it is not rape.

You say Landis is aggressive sexually. Okay. Lots of men are, but lets set that aside. I am more concerned with the claim that women know not to take anything Landis gives them. This is concerning and does point to illegality. Weinstein was a dirt bag, but nobody is claiming he drugged the women he got sex from. Does Landis engage in drugging? Because if he does drug his paramours then that is absolutely rape.
 
Yeah, that's right! Fuck, I forgot about her. She's one of his victims. They were "dating" but it seemed like he was just playing emotional games with her for fun, because he does that. He'd brag to me about how he was always making her cry, like that was just hilarious.
Hannah's been liking twitter posts calling Max out so... ya, definitely seems like something happened between them and that this poster was in the know.
 
No doubt she's chosen her words very carefully (read: manipulatively), but I've heard more than one story about Max's sexual sadism to know that he's got a very fucking questionable understanding of the word consent. One girl I know used the R word specifically. Grain of salt, sure, but I had no reason to doubt her. Girls around town know not to take anything Landis gives you on a night out the same way we knew not to go to Harvey's hotel room for a 'meeting'. Allegedly, of course.

ETA: I'm downright surprised no one has tried to bring charges against him in the past. OR, rather, that we haven't heard about it. It's his Mom doing most of the shielding btw. She's the power in the Landis house nowadays. Which is a shame - professionally she's a fucking hero.
Wait, his Mom? She's a big costume designer right? What kind of power does she really have?
 
A disabled, queer Jew is bad enough. But they're also obsessed with disney. I've never met anyone who's obsessed with disney as an adult who wasn't a fucking unstable isotope of humanity.

Being obsessed with Disney as an adult should qualify as a disability too.
Being obsessed with Disney as an adult likely means they are trying to damsel themselves in some way. While simultaniously insisting that they're the "strong protagonist" type.
 
For all I know this guy could have 20+ dead hookers rotting in his basement, but anything that Zoe Quinn and Becky with the Danger Hair claim about him should be assumed to be 100% bullshit considering they're two of the shadiest, most well documented liars that have threads here. Becky especially is a spoiled white girl pretending to be an oppressed Jewish Cuban genderspecial boy in between weekly steak and lobster dinners at Disneyland. One of the highlights of her thread, for those who haven't read it, is the time she lied about having cancer to fund a vacation to Disneyworld. She's a massive piece of work and honestly I think she's one of the most self centered, insufferably awful people documented on this site.

Becky is the kind of person that if she tells you the sky is blue you should be skeptical.
 
To be fair, Star Wars is also garbage.

db880d7.jpg
Fuck you!
Star Wars is great!
Just not.... all of it.
 
The thing about Hollywood is that it's all so incestuous and sleazy that it's hard to think of anyone voluntarily involved in it as a victim. Some celebrity or another once said they hated LA and thought the whole place should be burned to the ground. I can't say I disagree with that sentiment.
 
god damn it it, i misread whiney moore as being whitney (way) thore and didn't understand why she should be more embarrassed than him.
 
The thing about Hollywood is that it's all so incestuous and sleazy that it's hard to think of anyone voluntarily involved in it as a victim.

Mostly.

But the one exception to that is kids. To whatever extent their involvement could be called voluntary.

I, for one, think that Pedowood is real.
 
Damn I thought he would finally be held accountable for what he did to that Best of the Worst episode.

One of the episodes with him is pretty good - the one with the Neil Breen film (he might've introduced RLM to Breen?). Anyway we now live in a bizarre world where being a victim gets you social status. Bradley Campbell and Joseph Manning did an article on the perverse evolution over time from honour to dignity to victimhood cultures (The Rise of Victimhood Culture) - worth reading. Anyway, given that being a victim gives you cachet there's never been as much reason to take a default sceptical position.
 
One of the episodes with him is pretty good - the one with the Neil Breen film (he might've introduced RLM to Breen?). Anyway we now live in a bizarre world where being a victim gets you social status. Bradley Campbell and Joseph Manning did an article on the perverse evolution over time from honour to dignity to victimhood cultures (The Rise of Victimhood Culture) - worth reading. Anyway, given that being a victim gives you cachet there's never been as much reason to take a default sceptical position.
That's also what gets me about the people who are happy about this. Like, I understand the schadenfreude of watching someone get hoist by their own social vengeance petard, but at the same time I think that by celebrating and promoting these kinds of witch hunts we're pretty much just feeding the bloodthirst. The people we laugh at, though they deserve to be ruined, don't deserve to be ruined for fake things- they should be ruined for whatever creepo shit they actually do.

These people aren't gonna suddenly get wise to how disgusting victimhood culture is when a "male feminist" gets bit, because the process only ever eats one of them at a time. The kinds of people who get involved in these astroturfed movements in the first place aren't the kind who can notice trends and analyze them- if they were they'd never get involved with something so obviously fake and gay. So as things go along they'll see one or two people get their lives ruined by false allegations and just think "that bigot/nazi/sexist/rapist/whatever must have deserved it." When it comes to be their time, that same kind of person is gonna be on the other side crucifying them, and they'll never break the conditioning enough to fight it because they're so wrapped up in their cultural bubbles that the people who loudly proclaim their innocence MUST be guilty no matter what.

Just look at how PULL is treating Vic Mignogna's case and you'll see the level of intellect and self-reflection these subhumans exhibit.
 
There's something surreal in knowing your own father... who served as a Huey door gunner in 'Nam... managed to make it through a 12 month combat tour without killing a single Vietnamese child, but John Landis couldn't make it through a goddamed movie shoot without killing two using the same model helicopter.
 
There's something surreal in knowing your own father... who served as a Huey door gunner in 'Nam... managed to make it through a 12 month combat tour without killing a single Vietnamese child, but John Landis couldn't make it through a goddamed movie shoot without killing two using the same model helicopter.

They were in the trees man. They spooked him hard. It was a lot of stress from shooting the movie ok.
 
Back