Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?


  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
@Holden , I'm going to drop the pretenses and the "What Ho, Rape-Ape!" and Fuckbot5000 bits and speak to you straight. You probably won't read beyond this first line, and if you do your answer will more than likely be your attempt at being dismissive. We'll get to that in a bit.

About an hour or so ago you addressed @flossman with this little diatribe:

there's no cards to show. i dismissed you the moment you started rambling about history and realized you don't know anything at all. you're just another stunningly ignorant american idiot who thinks he knows the world when i probably know more about america itself than he does.

And it suddenly dawned on me. For all my cracks about you not having a college education and your bizarre attitudes towards society and sexual relationships, they were really missing the sad, inevitable conclusion: for all your bluster and posturing you're just so fucking mediocre. You're every second-rate comedian's dream: an unemployed internet tough guy who thinks the world owes him something. When questioned about your ramblings you immediately flare up and play the "Smarter than everyone" card and lash out in tired old cliches which you probably imagine sound insulting. In this community, if you were directing your attempts at OPL we'd straight up call you a ween.

So you dismissed @flossman? That's fine. @flossman doesn't need your validation. Nobody here needs your validation. And that's one thing you seem to either ignore or simply don't even understand: nobody here thinks you or your schtick is really even memorable, much less threatening. Right now it's just a way to kill time in the middle of the winter.

You're essentially the internet equivalent of a small dog that thinks it's much larger than it really is. Just barking and spinning around woof woof woof JULAY JULAY RAPE-APE RAPE-APE!.

Like I said at the beginning of this: if you even bother to reply you'll try one of your hackneyed attempts at being insulting or dismissive. You'll probably call me names or make a remark about my intelligence or attempt some crude sexual insult. You might even stamp this as "Autistic".
That's fine.

For a brief period in my life I worked as a telemarketer and I've had far worse thrown at me from people who--in the span of three minutes--have demonstrated far greater intelligence, charisma, and style than you can even imagine pretending to have.

You may just even choose to ignore this, or wave it off. Again, that'd just be a validation of what I've already talked about. You're absolutely right:

there's no cards to show.

You have no cards. You're nothing but talk talk talk.

And at the end of the day, everyone else in this thread, on this forum, in this world will be able to walk away wiser and more assured of their actual importance in life while you can only sit there behind your computer and ween.

Woof woof woof, little doggie. Woof woof woof.
 
Last edited:
@Holden , I'm going to drop the pretenses and the "What Ho, Rape-Ape!" and Fuckbot5000 bits and speak to you straight. You probably won't read beyond this first line, and if you do your answer will more than likely be your attempt at being dismissive. We'll get to that in a bit.

About an hour or so ago you addressed @flossman with this little diatribe:



And it suddenly dawned on me. For all my cracks about you not having a college education and your bizarre attitudes towards society and sexual relationships, they were really missing the sad, inevitable conclusion: for all your bluster and posturing you're just so fucking mediocre. You're every second-rate comedian's dream: an unemployed internet tough guy who thinks the world owes him something. When questioned about your ramblings you immediately flare up and play the "Smarter than everyone" card and lash out in tired old cliches which you probably imagine sound insulting. In this community, if you were directing your attempts at OPL we'd straight up call you a ween.

So you dismissed @flossman? That's fine. @flossman doesn't need your validation. Nobody here needs your validation. And that's one thing you seem to either ignore or simply don't even understand: nobody here thinks you or your schtick is really even memorable, much less threatening. Right now it's just a way to kill time in the middle of the winter.

You're essentially the internet equivalent of a small dog that thinks it's much larger than it really is. Just barking and spinning around woof woof woof JULAY JULAY RAPE-APE RAPE-APE!.

Like I said at the beginning of this: if you even bother to reply you'll try one of your hackneyed attempts at being insulting or dismissive. You'll probably call me names or make a remark about my intelligence or attempt some crude sexual insult.
That's fine.

For a brief period in my life I worked as a telemarketer and I've had far worse thrown at me from people who--in the span of three minutes--have demonstrated far greater intelligence, charisma, and style than you can even imagine pretending to have.

You may just even choose to ignore this, or wave it off. Again, that'd just be a validation of what I've already talked about. You're absolutely right:



You have no cards. You're nothing but talk talk talk.

And at the end of the day, everyone else in this thread, on this forum, in this world will be able to walk away wiser and more assured of their actual importance in life while you can only sit there behind your computer and ween.

Woof woof woof, little doggie. Woof woof woof.
(Bucharest drops mic)
(Exit stage right {pimp walk})
(Cue applause)
 
@Holden , I'm going to drop the pretenses and the "What Ho, Rape-Ape!" and Fuckbot5000 bits and speak to you straight. You probably won't read beyond this first line, and if you do your answer will more than likely be your attempt at being dismissive. We'll get to that in a bit.

About an hour or so ago you addressed @flossman with this little diatribe:



And it suddenly dawned on me. For all my cracks about you not having a college education and your bizarre attitudes towards society and sexual relationships, they were really missing the sad, inevitable conclusion: for all your bluster and posturing you're just so fucking mediocre. You're every second-rate comedian's dream: an unemployed internet tough guy who thinks the world owes him something. When questioned about your ramblings you immediately flare up and play the "Smarter than everyone" card and lash out in tired old cliches which you probably imagine sound insulting. In this community, if you were directing your attempts at OPL we'd straight up call you a ween.

So you dismissed @flossman? That's fine. @flossman doesn't need your validation. Nobody here needs your validation. And that's one thing you seem to either ignore or simply don't even understand: nobody here thinks you or your schtick is really even memorable, much less threatening. Right now it's just a way to kill time in the middle of the winter.

You're essentially the internet equivalent of a small dog that thinks it's much larger than it really is. Just barking and spinning around woof woof woof JULAY JULAY RAPE-APE RAPE-APE!.

Like I said at the beginning of this: if you even bother to reply you'll try one of your hackneyed attempts at being insulting or dismissive. You'll probably call me names or make a remark about my intelligence or attempt some crude sexual insult.
That's fine.

For a brief period in my life I worked as a telemarketer and I've had far worse thrown at me from people who--in the span of three minutes--have demonstrated far greater intelligence, charisma, and style than you can even imagine pretending to have.

You may just even choose to ignore this, or wave it off. Again, that'd just be a validation of what I've already talked about. You're absolutely right:



You have no cards. You're nothing but talk talk talk.

And at the end of the day, everyone else in this thread, on this forum, in this world will be able to walk away wiser and more assured of their actual importance in life while you can only sit there behind your computer and ween.

Woof woof woof, little doggie. Woof woof woof.
@Holden, son, you just got straight-up served.
 
@Holden , I'm going to drop the pretenses and the "What Ho, Rape-Ape!" and Fuckbot5000 bits and speak to you straight. You probably won't read beyond this first line, and if you do your answer will more than likely be your attempt at being dismissive. We'll get to that in a bit.

About an hour or so ago you addressed @flossman with this little diatribe:



And it suddenly dawned on me. For all my cracks about you not having a college education and your bizarre attitudes towards society and sexual relationships, they were really missing the sad, inevitable conclusion: for all your bluster and posturing you're just so fucking mediocre. You're every second-rate comedian's dream: an unemployed internet tough guy who thinks the world owes him something. When questioned about your ramblings you immediately flare up and play the "Smarter than everyone" card and lash out in tired old cliches which you probably imagine sound insulting. In this community, if you were directing your attempts at OPL we'd straight up call you a ween.

So you dismissed @flossman? That's fine. @flossman doesn't need your validation. Nobody here needs your validation. And that's one thing you seem to either ignore or simply don't even understand: nobody here thinks you or your schtick is really even memorable, much less threatening. Right now it's just a way to kill time in the middle of the winter.

You're essentially the internet equivalent of a small dog that thinks it's much larger than it really is. Just barking and spinning around woof woof woof JULAY JULAY RAPE-APE RAPE-APE!.

Like I said at the beginning of this: if you even bother to reply you'll try one of your hackneyed attempts at being insulting or dismissive. You'll probably call me names or make a remark about my intelligence or attempt some crude sexual insult.
That's fine.

For a brief period in my life I worked as a telemarketer and I've had far worse thrown at me from people who--in the span of three minutes--have demonstrated far greater intelligence, charisma, and style than you can even imagine pretending to have.

You may just even choose to ignore this, or wave it off. Again, that'd just be a validation of what I've already talked about. You're absolutely right:



You have no cards. You're nothing but talk talk talk.

And at the end of the day, everyone else in this thread, on this forum, in this world will be able to walk away wiser and more assured of their actual importance in life while you can only sit there behind your computer and ween.

Woof woof woof, little doggie. Woof woof woof.

You're my hero :heart-full:
 
I haven't seen a guy slap someone with his dick that hard since that vacation to Tijuana.
@Holden you okay there? For a rape advocate, you don't seem to take being violated too well.
I gotta agree, you are sort of the flavor of the month. It's been slow, and you're sort of like a Mr. Goodbar: nobody's first choice or favorite, but if it's just there, I'll have one, whatever. It's the definition of the low-hanging fruit. You're adequately asshole-tastic, no question, but you remind me a bit of those talking action figures. You only have so many phrases before you just start cycling and the charm wears off fast. Truthfully, I almost feel sorry for that. You're not even very good at being a lolcow, and that's something people are accidentally awesome at. My suggestion before you inevitably dismiss it? The people here are harsh, but usually pretty fair. The community here is unique in that it has people who actually offer sincere advice on how to clean your life up. They aren't nice, but they're honest. Consider their ideas.
 
@Hodlen, you wait else you going to do to promote love shyness? Complain on another forum, get naked somewhere else?
Should I get @4Macie to ask?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4Macie
@Holden, can you explain your nude protest and his article?

Governmentsgetgirlfriends_article.png
Hang on... he said that it didn't happen and the woman didn't know about it anyway...

I dunno... is reality something he enjoys, or something he tries to avoid if possible?

correct. but the point is that they opposed these things, and i oppose seduction. i want men and women to marry even if they never saw each other before.
You know, when you defined Seduction as anything that doesn't evolve Strength, resources or co-operation, I asked if simply spending time in someone company with the intention of possibly having a relationship evolved those three. You never answered that question, simply stating that it could INvolve those three or Seduction.

Now you seem to be arguing that getting to know someone at all is seduction... the problem is you just defined seduction as anything except arranged marriage with no prior contact, which means that seduction has been the norm for most of human history. Since that would mean we never gained any intelligence, you couldn't possibly be posting such stupidity onto a Forum hosted on the Internet...

Spot the flaw...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: Trombonista
illegitimacy rates
You do know that in the past any unmarried women were often packed off to "spend time with other family" for a few months... and when they came back they would suddenly have a brand new brother or sister? It's not that illegitimacy rates have gone up so much as people don't see it as something to fucking shameful any more.

Which is why any argument you make based on "Hey, the number of illegitimate children is rising" is worthless... ignoring some very relevant facts is a good way to show you're an idiot.
or studies on IQ declining, you ignored it or said it doesn't prove anything.
Oh goodness, you do know that IQ tests are designed to test only a fraction of what we know to be intelligence? And that the IQ level is constantly in flux since 100 is the average? ALWAYS the average... so if IQ goes up, it immediately gets adjusted back down. It also means if it goes down, it gets adjusted back up...

They are pretty much worthless as an indicator for anything, except how well you can do certain things.. things that are not the be all and end all of intelligence. (which you should know, you intelligent person you!)
so, go ahead, scumbag. show me your citation that seducers are good.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof
 
Another thing that might have already been pointed out (but in case it hasn't) is how obvious his motives are behind the whole "that's not a real relationship" and "I know this shit, and your wife has no clue what relationships are" and his absurd definition of rape. It's his way of de-legitimizing what he can never have. It's the pseudo intellectual equivalent of a child convincing himself that a coveted toy is actually a bad thing. That way the child doesn't have to be jealous of a playmate who received the same toy for Christmas. Furthermore, the child doesn't have to examine why he did not get the toy or how he might go about getting it now that Christmas has come and gone. He now believes this toy is terrible, and anyone who received one is an idiot.

I mean, just look at the way he talks. "The feminists are killing everyone who isn't a moron!" That's some 12-year-old-who-just-got-grounded level persecution fantasy.
 
so, let me get this straight. *proceeds to get everything completely wrong*
wow.
Yes, wow indeed...

Point is, you're only offering anecdotal evidence for your claims that SOME women like being raped therefore ALL women must like getting raped... and since there is VIDEO evidence that some men like getting kicked in the balls, therefore (using the same fucking logic you are, you fuckwit) ALL men must like getting kicked in the balls.

Notice that you spotted that it doesn't follow... and you STILL insist that anecdotal evidence means anything at this point. Here's a tip for you... when you negate your only evidence, quit. Carrying on at that point is just daft.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Scribbler
You are not paying to never have sex or a relationship. You can still get those things. Ok, you don't need a relationship and you despise all men who have it (like that poor man who you and his slut wife decided to put in prison) but you can still at least get sex by simply spreading your legs to thugs.

But thanks to you I can't get a relationship at all and have to rape and maim if I want sex.
But you just fucked a seriously mentally ill girl.... did you rape and maim her?

See, I think you can get women Holden. That was never in question. I think you just have to put this facade of hate you have and then go for women who are your a little below your standards. Obviously she has to have something mentally wrong with her... but in your blog you called three women you met IRL ugly. Seriously? You think you have the right to judge how someone looks? And then you describe one woman simply as "a girl with massive tits". Really? That's all you notice in a woman? You claim that thugs and rape-apes treat women as fuckmeats, but that's how you've treated any women in your life. Your mom? Fuckmeat potential. You even said in a couple places that you had no love for her and you wanted her in prison and or killed for not helping you. The "girls" from your dating sites? One girl didn't fuck you soon enough (because you were both shy or something) and you claimed that it put a lot of stress on you. You've put "romantic" pressure on any of the other dates you've gone on; either for a hand hold, hug, kiss, or sex. You actually told a girl that you didn't want to fuck without a condom.... and was surprised when the girl said "fuck you". A girl (the same girl maybe?) was talking to you about meeting up and screwing and you RUINED it by being a bitch and demanding that she type/message faster so you could get your freak on faster.

If a woman wanted to be with you, but wanted to wait say.... 5 years, before you guys did it. Would you accept that? Or would you call her an ugly bitch and walk out?
 
AA programs are for women only but not men only
In the US, such programs as you describe have been found illegal time and time again... in the UK, they are also illegal in that fashion. :edit: In fact, thanks to the shit that all EU countries have to sign up to if they want to be EU members, it's illegal in all EU countries... though whether some of those countries bother to enforce this is something else.

What isn't illegal is having programs in place that make sure you don't favour any one group over another based on things like Gender, Race, Age, Nationality, Religion and such. That is what Affirmative Action is on the US and UK... so perhaps you might want to stop making claims that are so easily shown to be false?

And because you'll insist that I'm just making this shit up... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action_in_the_United_States#Legal_history

:edit again: Funny thing is, the countries where they use AA in the way Fuckbot moans about include such stellar examples as India, Sri Lanka, China and Brazil. Not exactly the worlds most Feminist countries... but Fuckbot won't let reality impinge on its delusions.

You actually told a girl that you didn't want to fuck without a condom.... and was surprised when the girl said "fuck you".
This is the same girl he tried to punish by posting her pictures and real (whatever the fuck that means... he thinks he can say it means "For Real!" and not sound like a retarded moron...) and only took them down when she agreed to fuck him.

But don't worry, she offered that sex... it's not like she was being coerced in any way at all, certainly not like anyone was attempting to punish her for not fucking them... so it couldn't be rape, right?

And if I recall correctly, this is the same one who became a Lesbian afterwards... I know sexuality isn't a choice, but this makes me question that.

:edit: and you just know that someone is going to dismiss this on the basis that one insignificant detail isn't exactly right... not realising that by doing so they are admitting that everything else there IS exactly right. It's like only denying things that are false, it's a confirmation of what is true. (and what kind of fucking moron would not realise they've spent the last 587 pages doing just that...?)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can't provide evidence for claims I never made.
I'll correct him for you. You never provided proof that the girl on the beach dated her rapist after. I like how you cherry pick it based on semantics when you got mad a few pages back because of semantics. woof woof rape-ape pup.

I like how @Holden now has a picture of a "Welfare Princess" as his icon.... But if you look at any studies on welfare recipients you'd know that welfare queens really don't exists.
Here's a 2011 chart to go on:
5e5bc9d70.png
 
All the chatter above notwithstanding, I'm not sure @Holden is coming back after that beatdown, although we do know he's stupider than TJ, but then again, I'm a rape ape thug, so wtf do I know *sigh*
 
I like how @Holden now has a picture of a "Welfare Princess" as his icon.... But if you look at any studies on welfare recipients you'd know that welfare queens really don't exists.
Here's a 2011 chart to go on:
View attachment 12761
Some kind user made that for him, as he is the only welfare whore here. I thought they were very sweet to say princess instead. Unless I am mistaken, fuckbot doesn't have the ability to choose his avatar.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Coldgrip
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back