DESMOND IS AMAZING / desmondisamazing / Wendylou, Andrew, & Desmond Napoles - Child being abused/sexualized by parents for financial gain and fame.

  • Thread starter Thread starter RI 360
  • Start date Start date
Inb4 the like to dislike function is disabled
View attachment 797112

Next on "The Amazing Whore Kid" Desmond will have even more wardrobe malfunctions and half-ass a lame choreography in another dirty alley behind a Walmart! meanwhile Wendy-Lou and husband masturbate to shota porn!!

Seriously, if these are the best takes they could get I can't even imagine the deleted scenes...
 
It seems like having young boy/pubescent lovers is something tolerated in the gay community to some extent. Wasn't Alan Ginsberg an open member of NAMBLA? Didn't Milo Yiannapoulos defend a sexual relationship he had with a man at a young age? Pier Paolo Pasolini (120 Days of Sodom) said the love of his life was his underage lover actor Ninetto Davoli. There are so many examples off the top of my head.
This is all accurate and there are many more examples where they came from. It has been part of their culture, such as it is, since ancient history. Mostly gay males, but there is a fair amount of creepiness on the lesbian side too, like the infamous "coochie snorcher" bit in Vagina Monologues, or "Blue is the Warmest Color."
 
This is all accurate and there are many more examples where they came from. It has been part of their culture, such as it is, since ancient history. Mostly gay males, but there is a fair amount of creepiness on the lesbian side too, like the infamous "coochie snorcher" bit in Vagina Monologues, or "Blue is the Warmest Color."
I don't know anything about the vagina monologues but the movie Blue is the Warmest Colour was written and directed by a man. The graphic novel it was based on was written by a woman but is just the story of two young french girls in love who get kicked out by homophobic parents. The movie was thoroughly complained about by feminists for being overly sexualized and creepy when it came out though. You really can't blame lesbians for creepy shit they didn't create.
 
View attachment 796080
So someone met him close up at a recent pride conference. (link) And yeah things aren't looking good.
If something happens to this kid, what's Converse going to do?
It seems like having young boy/pubescent lovers is something tolerated in the gay community to some extent. Wasn't Alan Ginsberg an open member of NAMBLA? Didn't Milo Yiannapoulos defend a sexual relationship he had with a man at a young age? Pier Paolo Pasolini (120 Days of Sodom) said the love of his life was his underage lover actor Ninetto Davoli. There are so many examples off the top of my head.
It's not surprising. Guys want to spread their seed. If you're not attracted to women, but still have that desire, I guess that's the next best thing.
Next on "The Amazing Whore Kid" Desmond will have even more wardrobe malfunctions and half-ass a lame choreography in another dirty alley behind a Walmart! meanwhile Wendy-Lou and husband masturbate to shota porn!!

Seriously, if these are the best takes they could get I can't even imagine the deleted scenes...
Yeah, that looks like a kid who has a love for drag. Every so often, after he makes a pose, he looks off past the camera, almost like his mother is over there saying, "Now do this!" and he half heartedly mimics the move.

Also, I love the slow-mo shot at 3:04 where the camera pans and in the background some black dude is walking by looking at this shit show like, "what the fuck is this shit?".
 
Yeah, that looks like a kid who has a love for drag. Every so often, after he makes a pose, he looks off past the camera, almost like his mother is over there saying, "Now do this!" and he half heartedly mimics the move.

Also, I love the slow-mo shot at 3:04 where the camera pans and in the background some black dude is walking by looking at this shit show like, "what the fuck is this shit?".
797801
 
It seems like having young boy/pubescent lovers is something tolerated in the gay community to some extent. Wasn't Alan Ginsberg an open member of NAMBLA? Didn't Milo Yiannapoulos defend a sexual relationship he had with a man at a young age? Pier Paolo Pasolini (120 Days of Sodom) said the love of his life was his underage lover actor Ninetto Davoli. There are so many examples off the top of my head.

I don't know about the other examples, but Milo was the young man in a relationship with an older man; Milo spoke about it in a way that wasn't completely negative and instead of showing compassion for a clearly fucked up victim of sexual exploitation of a minor, everyone jumped on him for pedo-shielding.
 
I don't know about the other examples, but Milo was the young man in a relationship with an older man; Milo spoke about it in a way that wasn't completely negative and instead of showing compassion for a clearly fucked up victim of sexual exploitation of a minor, everyone jumped on him for pedo-shielding.

Lest we forget that the people who jumped on Milo and called him a pedo enabler are the same ones who are currently cheering on Desmond and other soon-to-be-raped-and-murdered “drag kids.”
 
Lest we forget that the people who jumped on Milo and called him a pedo enabler are the same ones who are currently cheering on Desmond and other soon-to-be-raped-and-murdered “drag kids.”
He really got a raw deal there; literally a victim of child rape and those claiming to advocate for social justice called him a pedo.
 
I expect them to sack up and have some trace of moral integrity and say "no way, this is wrong." Speak up and be heard. It's NOT that hard. There is no lynch mob coming to kill gay people who stand up to Big Gay. So they might not be as popular at the top parties or whatever, they're not going to get run out of town, fired, and killed.

And honestly even if that WAS what was at stake, at some point don't adults have the responsibility to take on that kind of risk to stop an oncoming tidal wave of perversity and exploitation from devouring innocent kids?

As far as the mainstreaming of pedos, the thing that gives me the most ominous feeling is the reaction of mainstream suburban Karen types. No, they're not getting on board with the far fringe stuff, not yet. But they have bought in to the idea of "virtuous pedos" that was sold by the propaganda machines a few years ago (Salon et al). They think of them as damaged little sickly wickly manlets, same way they got suckered by autogynephile troons. It activates their dumb animal protective reflex, and they will try to protect them from Big Mean Bullies who don't understand that the poor widdle pedos don't WANT to be this way, they just can't HELP themselves, and they are TRYING not to hurt anyone, they just need help and understaaaaanding.

Once you have the Karens feeling sorry for you, you're at most five years from storming the gates and having your way with the mainstream, period.
Normies tend to believe whatever websites they read and news channels they watch tell them to, especially if it's been slowly ramped up to.

If they tell them that there's nothing wrong with boys dressing up like female prostitutes and dancing around at strip clubs, they'll believe it. Especially in a post-Caitlyn Jenner and Rupaul's Drag Race world.

Society has decoupled transgenderism from sexuality and mental illness and made it so if you question if this could just be a ploy for perverts to be allowed into women's changing rooms and groom kids for sex you're a bigot that needs to be fired, never able to find another job again, and wallow in poverty until you die alone on the streets.
 
View attachment 796080
So someone met him close up at a recent pride conference. (link) And yeah things aren't looking good.

>FTR, I have no problem with kids doing drag.

Stupid people like this are part of the problem. "I'm not again this horrifying thing as long as nobody gets hurt".

He really got a raw deal there; literally a victim of child rape and those claiming to advocate for social justice called him a pedo.
Milo's case is quite special because he's one of the lucky ones who hasn't been severely damaged by being abused as a kid (at least if we don't consider his overall personality a consequence). Feminists and SJW often claim that rape is the worst thing that can ever happen to a person, but some people manage to survive it and adapt very well. According to some numbers he brought during his recent talk with J. Peterson, children can in fact recover very well from sexual assault. With that being said, they are still victims. Milo was definitely one even if he eventually managed a way to cope well with it.

Now, Desmond... he goes beyond this because his parents are parading around his exploitation like it's normal. If he's not being sexually abused by adults at the moment, he still is gonna have very fucked up notions of trust and identity when he grows up. He's gonna find harder to recover than someone like, say, Milo.
 
I don't know about the other examples, but Milo was the young man in a relationship with an older man; Milo spoke about it in a way that wasn't completely negative and instead of showing compassion for a clearly fucked up victim of sexual exploitation of a minor, everyone jumped on him for pedo-shielding.
I wrote that he was the young one in the relationship.

Here is the actual quote:

"We get hung up on this child abuse stuff… This is one of the reasons why I hate the left, the one size fits all policing of culture, this arbitrary and oppressive idea of consent.
I’m grateful for Father Michael [a Catholic priest Milo claims to have had sex with as a teenager]. I wouldn’t give nearly such good head if it wasn’t for him.
Pedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody who is 13 years old and sexually mature. Pedophilia is attraction to children who have not reached puberty, who do not have functioning sex organs yet, who have not gone through puberty.
In the gay world, some of the most important enriching, and incredibly life-affirming, important, shaping relationships are between younger boys and older men. They can be hugely positive experiences very often for those young boys."


*Whoops, here is the full quote.
 
Last edited:
Normies tend to believe whatever websites they read and news channels they watch tell them to, especially if it's been slowly ramped up to.

If they tell them that there's nothing wrong with boys dressing up like female prostitutes and dancing around at strip clubs, they'll believe it. Especially in a post-Caitlyn Jenner and Rupaul's Drag Race world.

Society has decoupled transgenderism from sexuality and mental illness and made it so if you question if this could just be a ploy for perverts to be allowed into women's changing rooms and groom kids for sex you're a bigot that needs to be fired, never able to find another job again, and wallow in poverty until you die alone on the streets.

we need a final solution to the normie question
 
I don't know about the other examples, but Milo was the young man in a relationship with an older man; Milo spoke about it in a way that wasn't completely negative and instead of showing compassion for a clearly fucked up victim of sexual exploitation of a minor, everyone jumped on him for pedo-shielding.

The age gap in question was also 17 to 29. Not exactly what most people think of when they think of pedophilia - 17 is past the age of consent in many places, including something like 2/3rds of the United States.
 
Stupid people like this are part of the problem. "I'm not again this horrifying thing as long as nobody gets hurt".
It's more than that in practice, though. If you present the same person that would say this with proof of an example of someone being hurt, they would dismiss the injury by saying something like, "You can't use one bad example to define the group" or something similar. They really believe something more like, "I will only be against this thing if everybody is hurt." And tbh, even then if you tried to prove that the vast majority are being hurt, they would just call you a stalker or a creep or something for being so invested that you found that much dirt.

But I agree that there's nothing wrong with kids dressing in drag. Kids should be allowed to wear whatever the fuck they want without some adults deciding it means something. But a "kid dressed in drag" is different than a "drag kid". Kids should be allowed to dress however they want but drag performance is a strictly adult activity full stop. I would more easily buy it if the "drag kids" were performing for "drag audience kids", but they aren't.
 
The age gap in question was also 17 to 29. Not exactly what most people think of when they think of pedophilia - 17 is past the age of consent in many places, including something like 2/3rds of the United States.

I agree it's not technically pedophilia, but he was a minor and with that kind of age gap, usually the older person is a predator who seeks out very young people because they're easier to manipulate. It's sketch as hell.

But I agree that there's nothing wrong with kids dressing in drag. Kids should be allowed to wear whatever the fuck they want without some adults deciding it means something. But a "kid dressed in drag" is different than a "drag kid". Kids should be allowed to dress however they want but drag performance is a strictly adult activity full stop. I would more easily buy it if the "drag kids" were performing for "drag audience kids", but they aren't.

That's how I feel exactly, too. Kids should be allowed and encouraged to dress however they want - if a little boy wants to wear princess dresses everyday, that's awesome! - but it doesn't mean they're "trans", or that they should be paraded around in sexualized public performances as "drag kids", or anything, it just means they're kids with personalities and likes and dislikes. I hate this new idea that if a kid is gender non-conforming, it must mean that they need to be medically or publicly abused and publicized in some way, whether that looks more like what happened to Jazz Jennings or what's happening to Desmond now.
 
I agree it's not technically pedophilia, but he was a minor and with that kind of age gap, usually the older person is a predator who seeks out very young people because they're easier to manipulate. It's sketch as hell.

I don't disagree.

That said, I'm going to say a thing. I offer it not as an excuse, but perhaps as a part of an explanation. Milo was, in one respect, correct: A lot of gay men know what he meant, because it happened to a lot of us. There was - and to some extent still is - a culture of the older partner showing the younger partner "the ropes", as it were. I, too, had my first relationship with someone considerably older than myself. I was 19, it was legal by any standard, but yes, it was still sketch. I stop short of saying the relationship was abusive per se, but it wasn't healthy.

I don't think it's a healthy thing, I don't endorse it, I merely say it's a thing that exists.

I think part of why it exists is because for a long time, a person coming to terms with being gay didn't really have any idea what to do with that knowledge. Hell, I only came out a bit less than 20 years ago, and even back then, it was... Gay people were a thing everyone knew about, but they were still largely relegated to comedic roles in movies and shit, and the first attempts to talk about being gay in school sex ed classes was still controversial and not wide-spread. I mean, beyond a general understanding of some of the mechanics, I didn't really know what it meant to be gay when I started to realize I probably was gay. Which creates an environment ripe for shit like that.

Which, again, I stress, doesn't make it a good thing. Because a lot of old fags, particularly those who have an interest in the young and vulnerable, have some pretty fucked up ideas about what it means to be gay. It took me a few years to work through and overcome a lot of the toxic shit I was taught.

...

Dunno what my point is, exactly. I'm rambling.
 
I don't disagree.

That said, I'm going to say a thing. I offer it not as an excuse, but perhaps as a part of an explanation. Milo was, in one respect, correct: A lot of gay men know what he meant, because it happened to a lot of us. There was - and to some extent still is - a culture of the older partner showing the younger partner "the ropes", as it were. I, too, had my first relationship with someone considerably older than myself. I was 19, it was legal by any standard, but yes, it was still sketch. I stop short of saying the relationship was abusive per se, but it wasn't healthy.

I don't think it's a healthy thing, I don't endorse it, I merely say it's a thing that exists.

I think part of why it exists is because for a long time, a person coming to terms with being gay didn't really have any idea what to do with that knowledge. Hell, I only came out a bit less than 20 years ago, and even back then, it was... Gay people were a thing everyone knew about, but they were still largely relegated to comedic roles in movies and shit, and the first attempts to talk about being gay in school sex ed classes was still controversial and not wide-spread. I mean, beyond a general understanding of some of the mechanics, I didn't really know what it meant to be gay when I started to realize I probably was gay. Which creates an environment ripe for shit like that.

Which, again, I stress, doesn't make it a good thing. Because a lot of old fags, particularly those who have an interest in the young and vulnerable, have some pretty fucked up ideas about what it means to be gay. It took me a few years to work through and overcome a lot of the toxic shit I was taught.

...

Dunno what my point is, exactly. I'm rambling.

I totally get what you mean. It's normalized in society for pretty much everyone, unfortunately, except straight men. I think for gay men and lesbians it also has a lot to do with not having many examples for your sexuality, not being able to find anyone your own age who is open about it, and thus seeking out older gays who know what they're talking about, you know? It's really tough to be out when you're young, it could ruin your life if you disclose to the wrong person who goes to your school, etc. And then older people predate on those kids because it's easy, encouraged, and everyone will just kind of go "well that's their choice". It's ugly but true.

I'm a lesbian and there was huge drama in a community I'm part of recently (in the last year or so) because one of the older, thirty-something lesbians was revealed to be dating a nineteen year old girl who had only just come out - the thirty-something lesbian was ostracized from the group (for good reason obviously) and the word went out to the younger lesbians that she was a predator. It seems to be becoming a lot less common for that kind of thing to just be handwaved or "allowed" by the community, thankfully, at least in the communities I see.
 
If something happens to this kid, what's Converse going to do?
They'll go get a new one and carry on as usual. Then they'll run that one ragged and then go get another new one after it breaks. It'll continue until the next fad comes along, and they'll quietly shift towards that and forget about all this.
 
Back