Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

Sean Schemmel is an absolute idiot, he has a massive ego despite being the shittiest actor in Funimation (Watch original DBZ Namek saga, I could fucking act better than that) I have no doubt in my mind that he's part of the Iago, Igor, and Renfield thing, dude's a massive fucking sped. What's sad is I actually like his voice, he just has no fucking talent.
Here Sean Schemmel spergs out at TeamFourStar for daring to make jokes about his precious show. He also says it's illegal which anyone who understands even the slightest thing about copyright law knows it's not (especially when TFS doesn't even monetize it). This also tells us he has basically no understanding of law in general.

He also got the guy who played Goku in the Ocean dub banned from a convention because how dare anyone else play Goku. It's sad when a fucking 80 year old woman does a better job of playing a hot blooded young man than this soy drinker.

He's probably Igor, what a fucking doofus.
Did the lawsuit even confirm still who Iago, Igor, and Renfield even are? I thought they were already gonna get revealed after Ronca was over? Guess not judging by E3 week.
 
Did the lawsuit even confirm still who Iago, Igor, and Renfield even are? I thought they were already gonna get revealed after Ronca was over? Guess not judging by E3 week.
iirc Ty's plan is to discover damning stuff about Funimation's upper echelons during this lawsuit and then go after the higher ups like Schemmel and Sabat. We're gonna find out after this round is over probably, my guess is that atleast 2 of them are Sabat and Schemmel.
 
Did the lawsuit even confirm still who Iago, Igor, and Renfield even are? I thought they were already gonna get revealed after Ronca was over? Guess not judging by E3 week.

Not yet; I believe Ty said in one of his recent appearances that he believed discovery would give them additional insight into other targets for round two of this suit. Once that happens it might become more apparent who these exceptional individuals are.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Botchy Galoop
He also got the guy who played Goku in the Ocean dub banned from a convention because how dare anyone else play Goku.

That was KC 2018 and Peter Kelamis and they thankfully straightened all of that out.


Schemmel can apparently be super spergy when he's on his period.
 
Sean Schemmel is an absolute idiot, he has a massive ego despite being the shittiest actor in Funimation (Watch original DBZ Namek saga, I could fucking act better than that) I have no doubt in my mind that he's part of the Iago, Igor, and Renfield thing, dude's a massive fucking sped. What's sad is I actually like his voice, he just has no fucking talent.
Here Sean Schemmel spergs out at TeamFourStar for daring to make jokes about his precious show. He also says it's illegal which anyone who understands even the slightest thing about copyright law knows it's not (especially when TFS doesn't even monetize it). This also tells us he has basically no understanding of law in general.

He also got the guy who played Goku in the Ocean dub banned from a convention because how dare anyone else play Goku. It's sad when a fucking 80 year old woman does a better job of playing a hot blooded young man than this soy drinker.

He's probably Igor, what a fucking doofus.

I'm still horrified he treated my Kirby like that. What a cunt. I hope his career dies.
 
That was KC 2018 and Peter Kelamis and they thankfully straightened all of that out.


Schemmel can apparently be super spergy when he's on his period.

I was just about to reply about this.
It's like last year's Kameha Con was a dry run for this year's shenanigans.
Didn't Kelamis end up going, anyaway?
 
I was just about to reply about this.
It's like last year's Kameha Con was a dry run for this year's shenanigans.
Didn't Kelamis end up going, anyaway?

Yeah, they had a talk and cleared it. Details are in the reddit link.

Sean said he didn't get him banned, he probably just whined a lot. But when people assumed it and tweeted at him he sperged out, as he usually does.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, they had a talk and cleared it. Details are in the reddit link.

Sean said he didn't get him banned, he probably just whined a lot. But when people assumed it and tweeted at him he sperged out, as he usually does.
Makes me wonder if that's where MoRon got the idea. Probably not, but the coincidences are entertaining.
 
It's a cult. I know it's a bit cliché to say it, but the socjus "movement", for want of a better description, operates the same way as any cult. Go search for the steps of cult indoctrination and you'll see the same list popping out again and again.

This is a good overview of common techniques. You'll see socjus (and troonery) using every one of them.
It's a weird mixture of cult and drug addiction. The initial love bombing stage also serves to hook the individual on the SJW drug of choice, internet asspats. Once they're hooked, they'll further the cult's goals on their own in order to get their next fix. Once the cult has fallen, I expect them to be willing to do anything to get their next fix. They will go completely batshit crazy in the coming years. Personally I'm hoping for at least one suicide and a few stints in actual rehab.

Just look at CPAP Super Lawyer Douchette. That's a man that will suck your dick for retweets. It also demeans them more when you call them addicts and screeching junkies. They've claimed "SJW" as a badge of honor. They can't do the same for "addict" and "junkie".

They can try to play those terms off but the truth shines through, and it hurts them. The hovels they live in, the grinding poverty, the lack of gainful employment. All plain as day. When you call them an addict, you shove the truth in their face.

It is indeed. But instead of a Jim Jones religion-based, or personality-based, it's political. And like any cult, it has it's leaders. But they aren't the Orca types. The people running the show aren't on twitter. They are in offices at the various 'intersectional' and grievance groups.
IIRC Jim Jones led a literal social justice cult.
 
IIRC Jim Jones led a literal social justice cult.

Yep, Jim Jones' main crusade was against "racism", "intolerance" and "bigotry" and was a Marxist-style socialist who would routinely rape members of his congregation (including children), break up families so they could better serve the collective, quash dissent, fostered a loyal core of insane partisans to act as his secret police, murdered a sitting US congressman, and then murdered his entire congregation, including children, before taking his own life with a bullet.

He, alongside all the great "social justice crusaders" before him, like Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Pol-Pot, etc always use "social justice" to hide their desire for absolute power and totalitarian control over others.
 
It's a weird mixture of cult and drug addiction. The initial love bombing stage also serves to hook the individual on the SJW drug of choice, internet asspats. Once they're hooked, they'll further the cult's goals on their own in order to get their next fix. Once the cult has fallen, I expect them to be willing to do anything to get their next fix. They will go completely batshit crazy in the coming years. Personally I'm hoping for at least one suicide and a few stints in actual rehab.

Just look at CPAP Super Lawyer Douchette. That's a man that will suck your dick for retweets. It also demeans them more when you call them addicts and screeching junkies. They've claimed "SJW" as a badge of honor. They can't do the same for "addict" and "junkie".

They can try to play those terms off but the truth shines through, and it hurts them. The hovels they live in, the grinding poverty, the lack of gainful employment. All plain as day. When you call them an addict, you shove the truth in their face.


IIRC Jim Jones led a literal social justice cult.

You can tell that it bothers Thicc Greg Douchette, too. I saw someone mention how much he tweets and he responded with the exact number of tweets over the course of 5 days, then divided that number by the total number of hours in 5 days, claiming that he was only tweeting like 12 times per hour, obviously and intentionally ignoring the fact that nobody is awake for 24hrs/day. The dude tweets, on average, something closer to once every 3 minutes every waking hour of his day, on average. It's honestly kind of sad. Imagine living a life that's so unfulfilling that you spend such a large portion of your life absolutely glued to twitter.
 
While their methods are exceptionally stupid, I at least understand their motives. Nick plays a pivotal by directly reviewing the court documents on stream. Never before has a legal lawsuit on the internet gotten this thorough of an examination by a legitimate legal counsel. Why do you think every member of kick know nick? Why all the defendant parties know nick.

It's their worst case opponent. A qualified expert whose political opposed, who's money they can't touch, and who's professional reputation they can't damage. When they do this, all I see is a pitiful group scraping, clawing, and flailing on the hope they could make the person they hate bleed in some way as punishment for crossing them.
So they're exactly like the Trump Derangement sufferers?
 
  • Winner
Reactions: moocow and Garth
Sean said he didn't get him banned, he probably just whined a lot. But when people assumed it and tweeted at him he sperged out, as he usually does.
Yeah, no. Especially after KC 2019, I have less reason to believe Sean. Sean can deny all he wants but Kelamis gave enough info to pinpoint it was Schemmel that was causing his appearance problems. Saying that he didn't get Kelamis banned does not clear him of guilt as it was clear he told KC staff either Kelamis gets dropped or he's not showing up. Sean's diva behavior is corroborated by various other sources and even another Goku himself, Kirby Morrow. Sean's just lucky that Kelamis is a bigger man than him and didn't cause a bigger stink over it.
 
Cohen acts like this is some type of gotcha. What a fucking chump. Nick was likely well aware months ago that his digital communications with BHBH and/or Vic could be subpoenaed. Now, what type of information would Nick have that is relevant to this case to warrant a subpoena? I guess that's for a judge to determine.

I don’t think it’s him being a chump. I think he makes certain assumptions along political lines, and disingenuously ignores evidence that challenges his assumptions. Why not? He isn’t likely to get in any trouble over it, and he gets a reliable fix of Twitter dopamine from the KV cabal.

He assumes that where there’s smoke there’s fire WRT rumors of misconduct. He assumes that Nick’s warning to Sabat was a statement of extortion. He assumes that Nick is a grifter, and likely therefore has convinced himself that Nick has something to hide in his correspondence with Ty and Vic. Maybe he genuinely believes that Toye has dirt on Vic, and some evidence of impropriety on Nick’s part.

People come up with their own narratives to fill in the blanks when there’s something they don’t know. The danger of this is when you let that narrative grow out of control and start overruling objective reality. I don’t know the law well enough to say how good of a lawyer Cohen is. I do, however, firmly believe that his understanding of the underlying facts of this controversy is either deliverately or unintentionally inaccurate.

That’s my two cents on the guy.
 
Oh gods no. Marzgurl is almost Judgement Proof by reason of being a penniless moron who is at best half a week ahead of homelessness on any given day.
She is not, however, injunction-proof. Being sued is one thing. Being explicitly ordered by a court to "shut the fuck up about this under penalty of law" is another.

She has repeatedly demonstrated that she believes herself to be above the law and fully justified in running her mouth. Ergo, no matter how much "legal trouble" it's invited on others by acting on her words, she feels untouchable and has absolutely no reason to stop. In fact, the legal trouble probably encourages her to get louder because in her mind "people are being silenced, so I must get the truth out there!"

Suing her will make her scream "oh my god they're oppressive me halp!" But a court order telling her to shut her hole will scare her into compliance, either immediately (as it should) or after the court spanks her once or twice for ignoring the order. I don't know the specifics in Texas, but "contempt of court" is generally a bitch no matter what state you're in. It's also probably not too hard to take a winning case, complete with injunction, to a court in her jurisdiction to ask for help enforcing it. Spending a weekend in jail (with a standing invitation for more if she can't be quiet) might cool her jets a bit.
 
She is not, however, injunction-proof. Being sued is one thing. Being explicitly ordered by a court to "shut the fuck up about this under penalty of law" is another.

Oh how i'd love a judge to issue a permaban from her using any form of social media.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yep, Jim Jones' main crusade was against "racism", "intolerance" and "bigotry" and was a Marxist-style socialist who would routinely rape members of his congregation (including children), break up families so they could better serve the collective, quash dissent, fostered a loyal core of insane partisans to act as his secret police, murdered a sitting US congressman, and then murdered his entire congregation, including children, before taking his own life with a bullet.

He, alongside all the great "social justice crusaders" before him, like Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Pol-Pot, etc always use "social justice" to hide their desire for absolute power and totalitarian control over others.
Fucking hell, it's like the SJWs are still using that exact playbook. They haven't reached the murder/suicide part yet, I guess.
 
Back