View attachment 801436
There you go, I can't find anything at the LoC under
ContraPoints, or
"Natalie Wynn Parrott", or
"Natalie Wynn".
View attachment 801438
In fact, the Library of Congress doesn't even bother to archive PewDiePie's channel, the biggest and most culturally significant Youtuber currently on Youtube... but I'm supposed to believe that they're going to archive Nyk's channel?
I mean, if the LoC wanted to archive culturally relevant and significant Youtubers, wouldn't they be archiving some of these channels instead?
en.wikipedia.org
Why the fuck would the LoC want to archive some obscure LGBT channel like Nyk? Wouldn't they rather archive some really big and famous LGBT Youtubers like Nikita Dragun (2,3 million subs) or Gigi Gorgeous (2,7 million subs) or homo Jeffree Star (15 million sub) or homo Shane Dawson (21 million subs)? What is more culturally relevant and significant, Shane's carefully crafted documentaries (that get tens of millions of views) or Nyk's mindless self-indulgence set to video for his cult?
I am still trying to find a video or public statement or tweet or anything from another Youtuber who has had their channel archived by the Library of Congress. I still can't find anything. This is really strange. If the Library of Congress was reaching out to Youtubers to let them know they were archiving their whole channels (which is what Nyk claims in the LA Times, that
his whole channel is going to be archived), wouldn't at least ONE of them mention this somewhere?
Again: I wanna see receipts or it didn't happen. We know Nyk is using the mainstream media to put out lies about himself, because he already lied to The Verge about how he supposedly only got active on Youtube in 2016 when he's been active on Youtube since 2008.
Here's an example of kinds of websites archived by the LoC:
Looking at
the way the LoC archives the likes of Giphy.com and Meme Generator as culturally relevant and significant content, the LoC doesn't really seem to focus on individual gifs or individual memes. It's not really about archiving a specific meme or gif, rather about archiving a media habit, highlighting that "this was something the public did at the time" as a form of entertainment or satirical commentary (the public made memes and gifs), with a couple of thousand unique memes or gifs archived as representative examples of this cultural activity. I would assume that the LoC archiving Youtubers would take a similar approach. It wouldn't be about archiving or highlighting a particular content creator or Youtube video, but rather about documenting the fact that during the 2010s there were these digital media content creators called "Youtubers", with a couple of thousand Youtube channels archived as typical/representative examples of "being a Youtuber" as a cultural activity.
To use telephony as an analogy, the LoC wouldn't try to archive individual callers or archive recordings of individual calls per se, but would rather seek to represent the act of calling someone as a significant content-generating social activity people engaged in, with recordings of a couple of thousand phonecalls as representative examples of what a telephone call was like in specific times and contexts.