Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

5412086-6317165-image-m-70_1540490802441.jpg

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'


FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

FB_IMG_1540539738552.jpg
 
Last edited:
This isn't Reddit, so trying to harvest karma by going "Look at how much I hate [$ATROCITY$], affirm that I am a moral person with the correct opinions!" is misguided.

Both of these women clearly should be locked up in an asylum for the rest of their natural lives, but I don't believe in euthanizing the deranged unless they are a danger to the public at large with no hope of cure (and even then, I still believe it to be immoral, but accept the act as necessary). These women are clearly only a danger to small children, and should be placed in an environment where they will never have any contact with small children again.

Oh no reddit, we've got a enlightened contrarian here to interrupt our circlejerk with a counterjerk! Saying something for the sake of going against the flow makes you real smard I hear.
Here's some reddit gold for being so smart and brave good sir :gold:
 
Or it could be something simple like ya know, I was exposed to the story for a very short period of time, was incensed by the brutality of it and responded with a little heart felt emotion. Not everything has the ulterior motives of a 12 year old wanting to be popular. I can't speak for you, but even someone as dead inside as me can get worked up from time to time by things this horrific.
That's entirely fair, and I apologize for being flip. I am not in the best of moods, and should not have vented at you.
 
1. Well I do, and I actually generally agree with all three of those.

2. It's effective in that we don't have to worry about that motherfucker anymore. Pretty much every case of 1st degree murder does. I'd also extend it to acts of violent rape and pedophilia. Law & Order is about protecting the general population and punishing and getting rid of violent insane fucktards who do horrible shit.


3. Yes, and that's a problem, mostly a problem caused by pussyfoot fucks like you who are more interested in protecting convicted criminals than they are actually upholding law and order. Death Row shouldn't be a thing. After they are convicted beyond a reasonable doubt take 'em outside and shoot the motherfucker, bury them in a nameless grave. Maybe if it's a real piece of shit we can publicly hang them, but even that sounds expensive and long. The fact the court cases are so costly and long is its own tragedy, I don't see how it's an argument against the death penalty.
What if someone is falsely convicted?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Plastic Inevitable
What if someone is falsely convicted?

That'd be why you'd use it sparingly. It'd only really be appropriate for cases where you've got indisputable evidence, being as death is a little hard to reverse. Cases like that of the OP --prior to thread merge-- probably fit. These two chicks murdered a boy for the crime of being endicken'd in a particularly troglodyte way, not to mention their past offenses. Not really any place for that sort of absolute feral in society.

Unless keeping them caged up in a cell for the rest of their lives sounds more practical/moral to you, you might as well get it over with. Death doesn't have to be painful either; give them some quick nitrogen narcosis and it can all be over with.
 
That'd be why you'd use it sparingly. It'd only really be appropriate for cases where you've got indisputable evidence, being as death is a little hard to reverse. Cases like that of the OP --prior to thread merge-- probably fit. These two chicks murdered a boy for the crime of being endicken'd in a particularly troglodyte way, not to mention their past offenses. Not really any place for that sort of absolute feral in society.

Unless keeping them caged up in a cell for the rest of their lives sounds more practical/moral to you, you might as well get it over with. Death doesn't have to be painful either; give them some quick nitrogen narcosis and it can all be over with.

In these women's case, I would give them 300 lashes each month for five years, after which they would be killed and made to pay their own killing bullet.

Putting it into Brazilian perspective: this is right up there with other child homicides we've had in the past decade. It's an act of wanton cruelty and it is so heinous to society it should be given extraordinarily draconian punishment as appropriate response.
 
Like I've said before. Public lynchings need to be legal in extreme situations like this, including that dog fucker in Cuba.
As colorful and satisfying as public lynchings may be, we should remember these kind of punishments are "not justice". Why not? Because justicehas to be impersonal and uninvolved in order for the punishment to not be disproportioned to the crime commited. That's why executioners existed in the past.

Of course i would agree that these people deserve a horrible, drawn out and horrifying punishments for preying and killing some of the most vulnerable in this world, but we shouldn't get people emotionally invested when it comes to punishing.
In these women's case, I would give them 300 lashes each month for five years, after which they would be killed and made to pay their own killing bullet.

Putting it into Brazilian perspective: this is right up there with other child homicides we've had in the past decade. It's an act of wanton cruelty and it is so heinous to society it should be given extraordinarily draconian punishment as appropriate response.
One wish the gods existed so they could dispense extremely imaginative punishments on some people. And even if the 300 lashes every day sound really damn nice i would advocate for the scottish method used on deserters: break their legs and arms in such a way that they can never heal and they have to crawl on the ground for all their life, depending on other people for absolutely everything. I bet it would be a nice show.
 
who the fuck would take the risk to cope/work with people who are so easily triggered?

That's the thing: you are no longer even allowed to point out that these are mental health patients with a psychiatric issue because being trans is no longer considered a mental illness by the UN. You are no longer allowed to point out that these people are sick in the head and should not be placed in a professional work environment where they put themselves and others at risk.
 
That'd be why you'd use it sparingly. It'd only really be appropriate for cases where you've got indisputable evidence, being as death is a little hard to reverse.
The problem with this is all criminal convictions are already "beyond reasonable doubt". If criminals convicted on circumstantial evidence get lighter sentences, they'll try to get more thorough in destroying evidence (killing living victims, killing bystanders, setting fires which kill or bankrupt relatives and neighbors, not telling where they hid the bodies).
 
Public execution for both of them. Televise/stream it, maybe pay-per-view. Acts like this put them beyond the pale of anything that could be considered human. Just executing two crazed animals.
And they didn't need to be troons or lesbians, they'd be disgusting pieces of shit if they were just serial killers.
 
I posted about this in the Zinnia Jones thread but thanks to @Positron for suggesting that it be posted here as well. It probably fits better here, anyway:

https://www.transgendertrend.com/gendered-intelligence-training-teachers-kiss-my-genders/

So apparently, according to this article, there is a UK organization called Gendered Intelligence which goes into UK schools to tell kids that biological sex is whatever you want it to be and that kids can choose to be whatever sex they want based on if they like pink or blue or dolls or football. Gendered intelligence recently held teacher training using an art exhibit to teach teachers about how to talk to kids about gender identity, except according to the person who attended the training and wrote about it at the link, the art exhibit is sexually explicit, explores BDSM, furries, other fetishes, and gang rape, and has nothing to do with kids or gender. Also the art exhibit is not age restricted so any kid can come in off the street and check it out.

Gendered Intelligence Training Session for Teachers at ‘Kiss My Genders’
Gendered Intelligence co-hosted a teacher training session at the Hayward Gallery last night for teachers of primary, secondary and higher education. The aim of the training was to “explore ways of talking about gender and identity, using Hayward Gallery’s Kiss My Genders exhibition as a discussion starter” and to “build skills to discuss key topics of trans awareness and gender identity, drawn from the exhibition, in the classroom.”
Kiss my Genders showcases the work of “more than 30 international artists whose work explores and engages with gender identity.” The show comprises over 100 artworks by artists “who employ a wide range of approaches to articulate and engage with gender fluidity, as well as with non-binary, trans and intersex identities.”
Gendered Intelligence has been delivering training in schools, including primary schools, since 2008. In itself, confusing young children about biological sex and eroding boundaries between the sexes through pretending that sex is not real, should be something that rings alarm bells for anyone concerned with safeguarding and child protection.

This exhibition though, and Gendered Intelligence’s involvement with it, is yet more evidence that ‘gender identity’ ideology is queer theory, which normalises kink, BDSM, fetish, porn and extreme sexual practices. In practice, this means that many young people who identify as part of the queer community, are being pressured to accept kink and paraphilia through fear of being accused of ‘kink shaming’ if they don’t. Once children are trained not to trust their intuition and to believe that having sexual boundaries is ‘bigoted’ they may be more easily manipulated into accepting further erasure of boundaries through a lack of confidence in their own judgment and a fear of being ‘non-inclusive.’
When you disable the function to recognise and name reality throughout society, this is the result: a children and young people’s charity involved in an exhibition of kink, fetish and violent porn passed off as an ‘exploration of gender identities’ which is suitable for all ages.
The following report of the Gendered Intelligence session for teachers was written for us by an anonymous attendee who wants to be known only as #lesbianonachair. We reproduce her report here just as she sent it to us last night, with no editing, so it is an undoctored, immediate response to the session. We are very grateful to her for attending this teacher training with Gendered Intelligence and for offering us her report of the event to publish here.
The Training Session with Gendered Intelligence

On 14 June 2019 I attended a training session held by the Hayward Gallery with the help of Gendered Intelligence for school teachers.
‘Teachers’ Twilight: Talking to Pupils About Gender’ was billed as a training session, to explore ways of talking about gender and identity, using Hayward Gallery’s Kiss My Genders exhibition as a discussion starter.
The session was led by Southbank Centre’s Creative Learning team, a curator from Kiss My Genders, and a representative from trans support organisation Gendered Intelligence. Teachers from the primary, secondary and higher education sector were invited to participate.
Firstly the schools manager gave an intro and wanted to know how many teachers were from primary schools, etc. She looked surprised when most put their hands up for primary, and so was I, but on reflection perhaps it shouldn’t be surprising. She explained that the exhibition was very timely as it is now the 50th anniversary of the Pride March and that the exhibition was informing their summer schools programme. She asked if anyone in the room had any students who would be particularly interested in attending workshops being held in tandem with this exhibition, which we had been given flyers about.
Then the curator, who was later to show us around the exhibition, talked a bit about how the exhibition pushed at the boundaries of gender. He showed a photograph of the opening night, which some of the artists attended, one looked as it they were wearing S&M gear, another was a man in drag who has featured on BBC news about being Muslim and trans. The curator praised the plurality of the art.
Finally it was the turn of the Gendered Intelligence representative to train us on what it means to be trans. He introduced himself as Dex and that he uses “they/them” pronouns, because he is non-binary. He said growing up he had a very tough time because people always asked if he was a boy or a girl and that had led him to identify as non-binary, which means, in case you don’t know, that he is neither male or female. He is from “generation Tumblr”.
He personally found words to describe his trans experience “helpful” and they gave him “confidence”. Gendered Intelligence achieved charity status only a month ago and their stated aim is a world “where people are no longer constrained by narrow perceptions and expectations of gender, and where diverse gender expressions are visible and valued”.
A ‘working agreement’ slide was put up, and Dex explained that there would be no time to unpack issues around sport (too difficult), no time to explain what the actual law means in terms of single sex provision (inconvenient). “We can do more than that by discussing best practice” he boasted. And then, a bit off topic, he said confidentiality about the history of trans lives needed to be respected.
Dex also said that we shouldn’t repeat anything else that anyone said in the room, or take photographs, but that he was “happy to have his own words passed on”. Phew, so that’s okay then Dex, I can quote you.
What does ‘trans’ mean?
We had to discuss in pairs what we thought this meant. Then Dex told us that “it’s about change” and that when a pupil in a school transitions, “the whole environment has to transition”. No-no’s are saying things like someone “wants to be something” or that someone “used to be a girl”.

Dex also observed that terms get out of date so so quickly nowadays, why even the young people he works with (and I judge that he was probably late 20s, at a push early 30s but I doubt it) think he’s such a fuddy-duddy because he uses such archaic terms. Words get out of date in a year now.
Also that sex is “assigned at birth”.
What is the difference between sex and gender?
Again we discussed this in pairs and then had corrections from Dex. Dex explained that doctors “diagnose sex”.

Then a slide which stated “only male and female” is a key cultural assumption and that 1 in 100 people are intersex and that 1 in 100 people are under the trans umbrella. It also said in brackets “statistics are indicative”.
Intersex people experience a lot of violence from doctors on their bodies (it is also a common trans activist trope).
Dex started to talk about the exhibition and he said that his absolute most favourite thing in the exhibition was a candle made out of synthetic testosterone.
Misgendering
If you misgender someone, just apologise and move on, it doesn’t have to be a big deal. Also, there are just so many new things coming up these days, there will always be new words and terms. New words and identities are very exciting. They give you choices and autonomy. Even older people might enjoy having the opportunity to use these new words to describe themselves.

Safeguarding issues
Did you know that a pupil presenting as trans is not inherently a safeguarding issue? (Although on one hand one can quite agree with this, surely one would come from a perspective that it might be a safeguarding issue).
Anyway if a pupil tells you that they are trans, respect their confidentiality, especially as they may not have made up their mind yet, although Dex knows of a 15 year old who posted it all over Instagram because they just wanted it out there and for everybody to know.

Access to gender neutral spaces.
Did you know that transgender pupils are not peeing at school due to lack of gender neutral facilities? Their bodies are literally being damaged by this and it is a form of violence on them.

Dex then related that he is currently mentoring a 9 year old child in a school, following the school requesting help from Gendered Intelligence. Dex has 1-to-1 sessions with the child as the child said they wanted someone to talk to. Dex had recently asked the child if they wanted to continue the sessions in the new term, to which the child said that they were “confused” about how to answer this. Which was an answer which Dex clearly was disappointed with as his voice dropped a note, though in a moment of rare self-reflection he did also acknowledge that some kids do change their minds.
Q&A session
Dex came into his own in the Q&A session. During the teaching session there was all the time in the world to listen to him, speaking about the matter closest to his heart, queerness. However, when the Q&A session started he began to look at his watch and exclaim “there might not be enough time” and also took a deep inhalation of breath signalling to us that he was very nervous indeed.

Someone asked a question about safeguarding. Yes, this person said, being trans is not de facto a safeguarding issue, but what if there is? What do you do?
Well, Dex advised us to ask that trans person, who has told you that they are trans “who else knows?” Dex also said that the “needs of the trans person” might be in conflict with the “needs of the family”. He said it a couple of times, as if “needs of the family” was automatically something bad.
I asked about the source of the statistic for “1 in 100” people being born intersex. Dex said he had no idea where that statistic had come from and that it would all be in the PDF pack that was going to be emailed out later.
I retorted that my understanding was that intersex was an extremely rare condition and that the figure was likely closer to 1 in 100,000, and that the figure they had given was grossly inflated.
Dex snapped back that the figure was from the intersex community themselves and that it was their statistic.
And that was that.
The ‘Kissing My Genders’ Exhibition

After the training session we went to look at the exhibition with a talk from the curator. Even before we entered the room we were informed that the exhibition might not be suitable if you have a latex allergy, so my red flags were already raised. No warning was given about the content of the exhibition, i.e. that there was be extremely graphic depictions of adult sexuality.
The latex allergy warning was given because there are two huge curtained off areas, made out of latex, and I have to say I felt a bit wheezy around it.
The first photo still that I looked at was of, I guess, a drag queen. A drag queen wearing a pair of handcuffs. I kind of rolled my eyes a bit and wondered how much worse it was going to get in the latex rooms.
The curator talked a bit how the show was all about different gender identities and how they are expressed, blah blah blah. Victoria Sin is one of the artists featured. Sin is a Canadian woman who identifies as non-binary and the curator explained that her work explores femininity (of course religiously referring to her as ‘they’). Still photos of her are projected onto curtained material, so that the image of her ‘tantalises’ the viewer. You can look up images of Victoria Sin for yourself if you like. She isn’t exploring femininity, she’s depicting a blow up sex doll. I thought to myself, there would be no way in hell they could get away with displaying that if they were projecting that onto a flat screen.
Then there was a section of more traditional portraiture photographic stills. Some were of faces, but some were in my opinion leaning towards soft porn (for example, a pair of long ‘sexy’ legs ending in a pair of very high stilettos).
More blooh blah bley from the curator as he talked about one of the photos which depicted a body covered in blown up condoms. According to the curator this artist was experimenting with the ‘hybrid’ body, by covering himself with blow up condoms. At which point I mentally asked myself, “is it that, or a rubber fetish?”
We moved upstairs to an area displaying mixed media art. Here there was a very large photo of an African woman, with what looked like to me lots of like black rubber gloves. The blurb besides the photograph described that the artist was exploring black identity. I do sincerely hope that the Hayward Gallery is not transing ethnic experience, but it does seem like that, especially as I felt that the image lacked any sexual charge whatsoever, and was simply a black woman being as black as she could (it’s a beautiful photograph).
On the floor in that area there was an absolutely huge rabbit suit, probably five metres long. I asked the curator what it was and he explained that the artist in question likes dressing up in them, but that this was one that he probably doesn’t use for performance. The curator said it was known as “the big one’ and then smirked. So that was the furries tick box checked then.
The curator also talked about a series of photos, again “exploring gender identity”, which were actually nothing of the sort, unless you think that looking like an alien, or having your face covered in fruit, is somewhere on the gender spectrum. Again, the curator used the word “masking” to describe this family of photos. Another red flag (‘masking’ is a rubber fetish).
Oh and there was also the candle made out of testosterone, which was Dex’s favourite. It was about 4 inches high and unremarkable.
Then we moved to an area where things are ramped up a bit. There were several more photos which were really depicting various BDSM practices, and incredibly a very close up photo of an erect penis. This is when I really began to think there must be an age restriction on this show of at least 15, and if so what was the point of bringing a bunch of schoolteachers to look at this. What age of kids are they thinking about? Higher education surely?
So I approached the school programme manager and asked her, was it age-restricted? She said ‘no’ it wasn’t but that parents were given an advisory warning.
I’ll just repeat for emphasis:
THE SHOW IS NOT AGE RESTRICTED.
I explained to her that that some of the exhibition material was actually pornographic in nature, and that in particular rubber fetish was a theme. She said that “parents know their kids best” and I pointed out that actually parents are the most likely demographic to be involved in the abuse of a child.

Then she went all corporate on me and told me how invaluable my opinion was and that she would feed it back, and that the Gallery had “consulted LGBTQ+ groups” in the process of vetting the show.
I said I didn’t understand how the Gallery could put a fully erect penis on display and think that it was okay for potentially young children to see such an image. I pointed out that the Gallery are failing responsible parents by not making clear that there are explicit images on show.
Then the school programme manager invited the curator to join the conversation. I explained my position to him that it wasn’t appropriate for children to see it at all. I pointed out that even in a 15 certificate film you wouldn’t be able to show a fully erect penis, and the same standard needed to apply in this situation.
He started to fob me off with the excuse, that all people who don’t give a shit about safeguarding give, namely that kids can look up anything on their phones these days, but I wasn’t having any of it. He tried it again and finally I told him, “you’re responsible for the content of this show, and you’re responsible for making sure that children aren’t exposed to inappropriate material, now I’m going to look around the rest of this show to see what’s here” and dismissed them both.
At which point I am genuinely going to give a trigger warning about what I saw next.
I walked up a little ramp to what I had already pointed out to both the Hayward Gallery staff members was reminiscent of a peep show booth. It was draped in blood red velvet, and had a phallic symbol – a Devil’s tail.
Inside a film played. A man fully encased in a rubber suit is lain prostate on the floor, surrounded by other men, he obviously can’t move, and then there is a cake. A cake which is just like him, the blue and white icing mirroring the colouring and striping on his suit. The men rip into the cake with their hands and inside there is lots of red jelly-like substance, as if it’s his innards, which they pull out and then they get the cake and then pretend stuff it in the mouth of the rubber figure on the floor. The metaphor is clear. This is a gang rape scene. The camera focus is all over the place, giving you the sense of movement in the scene, and of the confusion of the man being raped. A close up of a head fully encased in rubber being stuffed with cake. Complete dehumanisation and degradation.
Between all this happening there are flashes of men tied and bound up, crouching, with what look like actual metal spikes up their arses.
I couldn’t have been in there more than a minute so I didn’t even see the full thing. Just to repeat.
THE SHOW IS NOT AGE RESTRICTED.
And needless to say, nothing in that rubber fetish film had anything whatsoever to do with gender identity. Zero. No one can argue that. That was real pornography right there. You could take your kid to this exhibition and they could wander off up into the little room and you’d have no idea that they were going to be watching that.

So yes, that’s right, the Hayward Gallery and Gendered Intelligence looked around all the media on display, and in particular that film, and decided that they make this the springboard for the conversation with kids about gender identity. And that they didn’t need to age restrict it.
Even as an adult, I think I deserved to know that I was going to be exposed to a rubber fetish pornographic movie depicting a gang rape – who wouldn’t?
I could easily have left just then, gone home. I had seen enough to utterly destroy any notion that this is an exhibition exploring what is now fashionably known as ‘gender identity’, rather than fetish, but I went downstairs to look into the latex rooms (don’t worry the worst bit is now over).
In the pink latex room, you have to take your shoes off because the artist has chosen white carpet and doesn’t want people to get their dirty shoes on his lovely white carpet. I watched two minutes of the artist mincing silently into the camera and left.
The black latex room, is a film about gay male sexuality and Tom of Finland features. A camera rovers over a scantily clad man, avoiding the obvious area, and yes I kind of got the idea of where that was going, so decided to leave after a couple of minutes.
So in conclusion, no one at the Southbank or the Hayward Gallery has done any due diligence whatsoever looking at safeguarding issues. They have completely failed parents, kids and anyone who goes to see this exhibition expecting that it will explore how sexist stereotypes impact on us, and how we try subvert them. There wasn’t even one exhibit that I would say genuinely challenged a sexist stereotype. Not one.
Heads need to roll.
 
I asked about the source of the statistic for “1 in 100” people being born intersex. Dex said he had no idea where that statistic had come from and that it would all be in the PDF pack that was going to be emailed out later.
I retorted that my understanding was that intersex was an extremely rare condition and that the figure was likely closer to 1 in 100,000, and that the figure they had given was grossly inflated.
Dex snapped back that the figure was from the intersex community themselves and that it was their statistic.
"I've no idea where the figure I spurted came from."
"So you admit you're talking out of you ass?"
"It is from the INTERSEX COMMUNITY DAMMIT!!"
(If you are asked of the prevalence of intersex conditions, you can do worse than to cite the 1 in 2000 figures from Intersex Society of America.)

I explained to her that that some of the exhibition material was actually pornographic in nature, and that in particular rubber fetish was a theme. She said that “parents know their kids best” and I pointed out that actually parents are the most likely demographic to be involved in the abuse of a child.
But apparently parents don't know their kids best if they forbid little Davy dressing up as Elsa and taking horsepiss hormones.

Then she went all corporate on me and told me how invaluable my opinion was and that she would feed it back, and that the Gallery had “consulted LGBTQ+ groups” in the process of vetting the show.
But not teacher groups, not child welfare groups, not child psychologists (we can safely dismiss parent groups because we all know parents are all terves).
 
Last edited:
I posted about this in the Zinnia Jones thread but thanks to @Positron for suggesting that it be posted here as well. It probably fits better here, anyway:

https://www.transgendertrend.com/gendered-intelligence-training-teachers-kiss-my-genders/

So apparently, according to this article, there is a UK organization called Gendered Intelligence which goes into UK schools to tell kids that biological sex is whatever you want it to be and that kids can choose to be whatever sex they want based on if they like pink or blue or dolls or football. Gendered intelligence recently held teacher training using an art exhibit to teach teachers about how to talk to kids about gender identity, except according to the person who attended the training and wrote about it at the link, the art exhibit is sexually explicit, explores BDSM, furries, other fetishes, and gang rape, and has nothing to do with kids or gender. Also the art exhibit is not age restricted so any kid can come in off the street and check it out.
Imagine my shock that a group of pederasts pushing gender bullshit onto children are also trying to trick children into looking at fetish porn.

It's almost like the adults who create scenarios where they can isolate children and talk with them about genitalia have ulterior motives.
 

Sanjoor, Afghanistan — At first glance, 13-year-old Mangal Karimy could be any boy living in a small village in western Afghanistan, hauling firewood and feeding cattle on his father's farm.

Silently he hurries between chores -- a slight figure in luminous white trainers, lugging jerry cans of water across barren fields.

Until the age of two, Mangal was Madina, one of seven daughters chosen by her parents to live as a boy under an Afghan tradition called "bacha posh," a Dari term that translates to "dressed as a boy."

For as long as Mangal can remember, he tucks his long hair under a woolen cap, pulls on his jacket and trousers and helps his father tend their wheat and dairy farm in the snow-capped village of Sanjoor, in Herat province.

In Afghanistan's deeply patriarchal society, sons are highly valued over daughters -- to the point where a family is deemed "incomplete" without a boy, says Nadia Hashimi, an Afghan-American pediatrician and author of the best-selling 2014 bacha posh novel "The Pearl That Broke Its Shell."

Mangal Karimy has been living as a boy since the age of two.

Girls are brought up believing they are a burden on the family, said Sodaba Ehrari, Chief Editor of the Afghanistan Women News Agency (AWNA), who has interviewed several parents of bacha posh children. Women "cannot earn money to support their families, they cannot live alone -- and so many reasons (like this) lead them in this patriarchal society to practice bacha posh," she said.

The centuries-old tradition says much about the discrimination faced by Afghan girls quite literally from the moment they're born. After all, "no one who has only sons is transforming them into a daughter," Hashimi says.

The transition is temporary, and bacha posh children are expected to shed their male identities once they hit puberty and return to living as girls -- something that doesn't always come easily.

Underpinning the custom is the superstition that a bacha posh child will "turn the hand of fate, so that the next child born into the family will be a boy," Hashimi says.

Mangal's father, Khoda Bakhsh Karimy, told CNN that should the family have a son, the child would return to living as a girl. Until then or the point when Mangal hits puberty, Khoda and his wife Amena Karimy were "happy" with Mangal and the responsibilities he carries out, like "welcoming guests to our home and offering them tea or food."

'I made my daughter like a boy'

After having two girls, Mangal's parents longed for a son. "We made her like a son to help her father," said mother Amena.
"I made my daughter like a boy to serve me food and water when I am working in the desert," father Khoda said.

In the Dari language there are no gender pronouns "he" and "she." But Mangal told CNN he preferred being referred to by his male identity -- and the English equivalent "he."

His parents meanwhile, believe that Mangal's gender at birth -- female -- remains unchanged. The English translation of their conversation uses the pronoun "she."

Mangal is a cherished extra pair of hands for the family of nine who earn around 6,000 Afghani (around $80) per month -- meager even by Afghanistan's standards.

"I love all my daughters but I love Madina more as I ask her to do work like 'go take care of the cattle' or 'bring something to a neighbor,'" says Khoda. "Otherwise there is no difference between them."

Author Hashimi says that Afghanistan's love for its sons has practical roots. In this agricultural economy it's the boys who chop wood, plow the field, travel independently and work outside the home, she says. And when they marry, their wives -- and the next generation of children -- are absorbed into the family.

For girls, it's a very different story. A daughter is expected to be "demure" and "help with domestic chores," says Hashimi. Outside the home, a girl "haggling in the market" or "looking adults in the eye" would come as a shock for some people, she adds.

For parents without a son, bacha posh is a workaround to these obstacles that cuts across socioeconomic lines. Data on the practice is scarce, but Hashimi says almost every Afghan she interviewed for her book knew of a bacha posh child -- regardless of region or class.

'People kind of go along with it'

Sitting beside his father in their simple mudbrick home, softly spoken Mangal keeps his answers brief. With a shy, quick smile, he says that "yes" he likes being a boy and prefers being referred to by the English pronoun "he."

But, he adds: "I would like to go back to being a girl when I grow up."

When not helping on the farm, Mangal says, he likes to play football with other boys in the village, where he is the only bacha posh child.

His father, Khoda, says neighbors have been accepting of Mangal, only telling him that the child "should wear girl's clothes when she grows up."

To which Khoda replied: "Of course."

Even when people realize a child is, in fact, a girl dressed as a boy, "they kind of go along with it," explains Hashimi.

"There's this understanding that the family is using this loophole to get around this void, to try and right their family, and have a source of honor and pride," she says.

Mangal occupies a blurred space between daughter and son. When not working on the farm, he attends a girls' school along with four of his sisters. But he does so dressed as a boy and known by his male name.

"No, I don't consider him like a son," says Khoda. "We know she is a girl, in the future she must wear girl's clothes and marry someone."

Each family has their own take on bacha posh. Journalist Ehrari said some parents told her they were "trying to hide or don't want to show others that they have daughter." A son is a source of pride, whereas "having a daughter is a shame," they said.

Other parents said they desperately wanted their daughters to "have achievements." But in a society where "everything is just for men," bacha posh was the only way "their daughters could live in freedom," said Ehrari.

Their clothes might be different, but the inequality remains, said Ehrari. "This is an injustice against women, that they can't be themselves and live like a woman freely.

'There were so many advantages and disadvantages'

Making the transition back to living as a girl -- particularly after a brief glimpse of male freedoms -- can be a painful process.

Shazia, who did not want her last name published, was nine years old and living in Kabul in 1990 when her parents decided to transition her to bacha posh for five years.

With civil war raging, Shazia's parents had already sent her two older brothers away to Russia to avoid them being drafted. But when her father -- a middle-class businessman dealing in imports and exports -- lost his leg in an accident, her mother and the remaining six daughters were left without a breadwinner.

"That's when my family decided for me to dress up as a boy," says Shazia, who, as the third daughter, was deemed old enough to help her mother outside the home -- but still young enough to pass for a boy.

"I had to play the role of a son," says Shazia, who went by the male name Mirwas and was made to cut her hair and wear boys' clothes.

Practically overnight Shazia's daily chores changed dramatically -- from "cleaning and feeding the chickens" to "accompanying my mum at the local market." Sometimes Shazia would even get groceries alone, something she described as a "huge undertaking, especially for a young girl."

"There were so many advantages and disadvantages to being bacha posh," says Shazia, today a 37-year-old mother of three daughters, working for a women's NGO in the United States.

As "Mirwas" she could "fly kites, play soccer with neighborhood kids, ride my dad's bicycle -- all of which were not ordinary activities for a girl in Afghanistan," Shazia told CNN by phone from her New York home.

But she was also bullied by her sister and cousin for wearing boys' clothes and tasked with the most grueling chores. "During the harsh winter I would have to stand in a line and receive bread to feed my family," Shazia says. "I was jealous of my sisters in the house, warm."

'I was stuck between being a girl and boy'

While the immediate family knew Shazia's true identity, the wider neighbourhood was unaware, and she describes the torment of "playing two different roles in society."

"I felt particularly insecure about my facial features, my clothes, my stature compared to boys my age," she says. "This imposed lifestyle was not my choice. I was stuck between being a girl and boy."

Hashimi says this transition between genders is "essentially imposing an identity crisis on a young psyche." She says that the bacha posh tradition could induce a "gender dysphoria" where children are "simply not content with their biological gender and feel like they belong in a different world."

Shazia's return to girlhood came at 13 when one of her older sisters intervened, telling the family "this is enough."

"My sister was really, really tough," says Shazia. "She beat me up, she threw out all my male clothes, she said 'you have to become a girl.'"

Shazia's parents agreed and gradually she emerged into the world as a girl again, at first fearful of going "outside because my neighbors would see me" and "wearing a big scarf until I had grown my hair long enough."

A few months later, the family moved to Pakistan and Shazia was able to fully embrace her female identity. But years of boyhood, or having a masculine identity, "left me confused about my identity," she says.

Bittersweet return to girlhood

For many bacha posh children, becoming a girl again can be bittersweet says Hashimi. "It's an experience of what it's like to be on the other side, in a country where those two sides are remarkably different." In extreme cases, she says, they may even refuse to return to living as women at all.

With so little data available, it's hard to say whether the practice is dwindling or growing. But Hashimi believes bacha posh will ultimately "die out as Afghan society continues to advance the place of women in society."

In recent years the Taliban has strengthened its grip over Afghanistan -- between 60% and 70% of the country is now contested or under its control. As the Islamist militant group gains ground, gender inequality -- and the need for bacha posh -- will continue, said Hashimi.

Each year, the advocacy group Women for Afghan Women assists at least two bacha posh cases at its women's shelters across the country. The girls, aged between 14 and 18, "are not in a stable emotional, mental and financial state," said the group's executive director, Najia Nasim.

Many are referred to the shelters by police. The girls are usually "friends with boys and have more freedom," said Nasim. She added that they "often end up being abused" by people making them "dance, drink and (take part in) sexual activities."

Such girls might end up in a "special prison for children under 18 called a rehabilitation center," Nasim said. With the help of mediators and mental health services they could also be re-integrated into their families, she added.

CNN contacted the Afghan government for comment on its position on bacha posh but did not receive a reply.

But the Afghanistan Women News Agency's Ehrari said that the government has traditionally not spoken out against bacha posh, because it believed the practice "comes from the Afghan culture and was a custom which couldn't be changed."

Through family connections, Shazia was married at 18 to an Afghan man living in New York. While her husband is "fully supportive" of her bacha posh past, the couple have never discussed it at length, she says. Instead, it was her 17-year-old daughter who encouraged Shazia to share her story publicly for the first time.

"I have three girls. And people would tell me 'oh you should really have boys, try to have boys.' I said 'No, there's nothing boys can do that girls can't,'" Shazia says.

"Girls are not a burden. They are really a blessing."

Meanwhile back in Sanjoor, Mangal continues with his daily chores, diligently shoveling soil alongside his father in the winter chill.

A group of younger neighborhood boys watch from a short distance. Mangal's sisters remain inside the home, hidden from view.

CNN's Ehsan Popalzai contributed to this report.
 
Back