These people are so FUCKING STUPID that it hurts my brain. This took me two seconds to find:
"Two circumstances foreclose asserting the privilege: first, excessive publication, defined as publication to those with no common interest in the information communicated, or publication not reasonably calculated to protect or further the interest; and, second, publication with malice, which, within the context of the common interest privilege, is the equivalent of bad faith. " -
Found here
To assert the privilege, you basically have to keep it between interested parties, and you have to be doing it in good faith. BOTH of those should be easy to defeat, especially considering it appears that the defense must show reasonable steps to verify the information and actually believe it to be true (actual malice under the law), according to
this, which says, "The person making the statement/publisher will have to satisfy the Court that he/she has taken proper steps to verify the accuracy of the statement and believed it to be true."
This shit is truly mind-boggling, but I refuse to engage with these cuck superlawyers anymore, because they'll assert their degree and license as proof of their infallibility.