Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

The only "black people" that could possibly have been at Chernobyl would have been anyone that got cooked.



View attachment 798954

I refuse to give money to anyone, let alone Nigs, Peyutes, and Pakis, and I especially don't gie anyone money unless I'm getting something in return.

Edit to dodge a double-post -



View attachment 799378View attachment 799379

Apparently, Section 14 of the Ontario Human Rights Code permits open discrimination, in the name of representation.
I would have thought that completely contradicts the spirit of the Human Rights Code, but it apparently doesn't.

View attachment 799388

Apparently, if you're "under-represented", it's 100% okay to discriminate against white people, or anyone that's more represented, as far as I can tell from reading the above.
A bit of a late reply to this, but this is becoming more and more common in Ontario universities. Some job postings will say the above, or that they "prefer" women and minorities applying to the position. I've also seen some that require a diversity survey be completed when applying.

I like how the Western University one says "self-identify" as a woman or indigenous person. There used to be a saying in research that goes "Publish or Perish" but these days it's looking more like "Get trooned out or be tuned out"
 
it would take a..... full-on Civil War to unlodge them from the machinary of power that lets the lunatic left do evil in the eyes of God and suffer no consequences while doing said evil.

SJWs don't own guns or hold them, so I'm down. The Tree of Liberty could use a watering.

I like how the Western University one says "self-identify" as a woman or indigenous person.

There isn't and can't be an objective standard for self identification without destroying the entire trans movement, so just say you identify as an indigenous woman.

Ask the madlad David Lewis, if you want.

He is standing for election as women’s officer, a post that Labour rules say can only be held by a woman. David is standing for that post because he is a woman. On Wednesdays, at least. When we spoke yesterday, he put it like this:
“I self-identify as a woman on Wednesdays, between 6.50am when my alarm goes off and around midnight when I go to bed.”

Denial is gatekeeping, after all.

Labour operates a policy of self-definition: if someone defines themselves as a woman, the party recognises that person as a woman, with no question, verification or scrutiny of that definition. This approach is intended to make the party inclusive and supportive of transwomen, people who were born male and later say they wish to change their gender and be recognised as female. Many advocates of greater legal rights for trans people say that accepting such self-identification is right and fair because “gatekeeping” checks, where trans people are required to “prove” their gender identity to another person or authority, are discriminatory and intrusive. “Transwomen are women,” they say, as if those three words are all that’s needs to settle this matter. More on this later.
 
Remember that the actual Crusades ended in failure. The Muslims gradually retook all the land the Crusaders had taken, and eventually it was all for naught...
It helped that Muslims had slightly better technology than we did at the time, and the home field advantage strengthened by nobody having invented Galleons yet.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Alec Benson Leary
A bit of a late reply to this, but this is becoming more and more common in Ontario universities. Some job postings will say the above, or that they "prefer" women and minorities applying to the position. I've also seen some that require a diversity survey be completed when applying.

I like how the Western University one says "self-identify" as a woman or indigenous person. There used to be a saying in research that goes "Publish or Perish" but these days it's looking more like "Get trooned out or be tuned out"

Another fine example of it - https://nationalpost.com/opinion/matt-gurney-the-cbcs-no-whites-policy-is-a-mistake-but-no-accident

806290

806291

806293

806295

806296

Edit to avoid a doubleposting like a faggot -

Going back to what @Army Burger and I had mentioned about how complex the matter of indigenous peoples in Canada is, here's some bald sperg from the National Post sperging about how badly he thinks Trudeau has handled the final report from the "Truth and Reconciliation Committee" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=41&v=zu-5inK8_VQ
 
Last edited:
Honestly... I just assumed it was unironic. I don't know if that's a bigger indictment of society or myself...

Society. You can barely wedge a sheet of paper between parody and reality. Even Private Eye fell for the Titania McGrath account. I probably say ‘this HAS be a joke... right..?’ Far too often.
 
Social Justice Warriors are the worst assholes civilization has ever created in all of human history, I mean that literally.

To so smugly act like a complete asshole while at the same acting like you're God's gift to the very concept of kindness and compassion while being anything but kind and compassionate.

I mean it, there's never been bigger hypocrites in all of human history than these people.

But on top of everything they destroy any semblance of fun in pop culture and hobbies, they want to make everyone in the world as miserable as they are, they are monsters, literally monsters.
 
How you guys ever noticed how biracial/mixed people's identities are a big problem to many liberals/sjws?
The fact that a Japanese star, featured in Japanese ads and winning sporting awards for Japan, is not only mixed-race but Black
So there is something empowering about merely calling Naomi Osaka Japanese, whether it be in headlines or advertisements. And it’s a correct assertion: she is Japanese. Her biraciality does not make her less so.
But we must also seek to empower her and respect her as a Black woman, singularly. Just as her Blackness does not make her less Japanese, her Japanese-ness does not make her less Black
.

Liberals/sjws/tumblr says you should let people identify as whatever they choose. That "policing" someone's identity is "wrong".

But Black people will hate it if Naomi were to identify as being just "black" because she's "biracial, not black".
Asians won't accept her if she said she was just "Asian". And despite being half Japanese, she'll always be seen as just "black" to them.
If she said she was "Mixed" people will get mad at her if she only "acknowledges" part of her heritage.
One thing everyone can agree on though is that it's "incorrect" to point out that Naomi Osaka is for all intents and purposes just "Asian" even if she was born and raised in, plays for and has citizenship to an Asian country.

Similar problems arose with the ethnic background and racial identities of Obama and Meghan Markle. You'll see so many think pieces and online debates (like on Twitter) on why they are or aren't "black".
 
Last edited:

I like how their seems to be some sort of "POC solidarity" message there when many "POC" groups I know don't give a shit about other POCs.

Names also always seem to be exempt from culture appropriation. This girl I knew was going on about how culture appropriation is bad.. but her name was Celeste, which is French but she wasn't from a French speaking country or had any French heritage whatsoever.

A bit of a late reply to this, but this is becoming more and more common in Ontario universities. Some job postings will say the above, or that they "prefer" women and minorities applying to the position. I've also seen some that require a diversity survey be completed when applying.

I believe Canada has an anti-discrimination policy so "Prefer" is basically their "loop hole" so they can't get hit with a discrimination lawsuit. You can challenge this by questioning what "exactly" it means to be a "minority". Does a Jew count as a minority? What about an Eastern European?

There was a Tech Company back in April which did this. But notice how "preferably minority" pages aren't given the same criticism? The company was owned by an Indian and technically they're "Caucasian" (it's a broad term with multiple definitions), but in this context that's not what they meant.

806709

I always think of Archer's episode on "diversity" whenever I think of Diverse hirings.
 
Last edited:
I like how their seems to be some sort of "POC solidarity" message there when many "POC" groups I know don't give a shit about other POCs.

Names also always seem to be exempt from culture appropriation. This girl I knew was going on about how culture appropriation is bad.. but her name was Celeste, which is French but she wasn't from a French speaking country or had any French heritage whatsoever.



I believe Canada has an anti-discrimination policy so "Prefer" is basically their "loop hole" so they can't get hit with a discrimination lawsuit. You can challenge this by questioning what "exactly" it means to be a "minority". Does a Jew count as a minority? What about an Eastern European?

There was a Tech Company back in April which did this. But notice how "preferably minority" pages aren't given the same criticism? The company was owned by an Indian and technically they're "Caucasian" (it's a broad term with multiple definitions).


I always think of Archer's episode on "diversity" whenever I think of Diverse hirings.

And like I said, there's that clause in the Ontario Human Rights Code that pretty much explicitly excuses discrimination against whites, as long as they're doing it in favour of some kind of minority. Fuck knows I'd be insulted if I was told my only value was some heritable characteristic, and not my actual skills.

Edit to secure a future for my doubleposts -

806726


in reference to this part of the clip of the Proud Boys marching in Philly today -

806729


But the question is, is AoC also a huwite spremasist?

806731
 
I believe Canada has an anti-discrimination policy so "Prefer" is basically their "loop hole" so they can't get hit with a discrimination lawsuit. You can challenge this by questioning what "exactly" it means to be a "minority". Does a Jew count as a minority? What about an Eastern European?

There was a Tech Company back in April which did this. But notice how "preferably minority" pages aren't given the same criticism? The company was owned by an Indian and technically they're "Caucasian" (it's a broad term with multiple definitions), but in this context that's not what they meant.


I always think of Archer's episode on "diversity" whenever I think of Diverse hirings.

You're supposed to let anyone apply and then throw out the resumes from the races you don't want.
 
Back