Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

If there was a single black worker at Chernobyl I’d be surprised. The black population in Ukraine is tiny (and does face quite a bit of racism.) I’m all for accurate reflection of a population, but shoehorning people in for the sake of it just doesn’t work.

On that subject, it seems that uk advertisers in fact over represent minorities: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...tisers-trying-hard-demonstrate-diversity.html

Archive link: http://archive.li/W9rJk

This is another thing I find jarring. Ads are rarely ‘three black friends go to a bar’ but instead it’s ‘right we need a woman and a man, and one of each ethnicity and a Muslim and someone in a wheelchair’ so that adverts start to look like a setup for a sitcom. (Cue reeeeeeing that there aren’t any trannies...)
The shit that makes it wacky is that the 15% minority population MUST BY LAW show up in 100% of fiction or else I don’t know they’ll Marty McFly from the Wegman’s parking lot while eating their lunch or whatever
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ineedahero
This is so horrifying I am legit Mad At The Internet. Selling horrific body mutilation directly to kids, using a fantasy character that symbolizes purity of heart and innocence, and shitty ass art. Progress!
And to think, getting your tonsils taken out was such a big challenge for anyone to go through.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Forgive my double post, I wanted to wait but I would've forgotten too much.
I see these posters as interesting artifacts of peak SocJus.
With every passing day, the statements on them become more and more absurd - the pendulum swings.
They're just shamefully stupid garbage. They should be maintained as a time capsule of some sort, like Communism or McCarthyism. Some day, we won't be able to remember that this insanity was once championed on an international platform.

ETA - one of the big lessons I've picked up recently is that it's not so much what your beliefs are, it's how you communicate them that really makes or breaks you. The core message of these posters isn't edgy or fringe, Most folks agree with reproductive rights nowadays, so whats the damage? "That's too boring, so in order to get attention, we have to put some disgusting demeaning garbage in front of that message."

What utter lack of imagination. I look at these posters and I remember that era. Do you remember the first time you heard the words, "Stunning and Brave"? I remember them echoing all through media in a burst and feeling admiration for that writer's achievement. What a choice of words. These posters up above are very stunning, very brave.

This was, IMO, the start of when activist types began really subscribing en masse to this notion that deliberate offense was the only way to make your point. If only they knew how much damage they've done. Could you imagine how awful that would be? If the many people who sought to disgust and provoke in the name of their cause could see or understand the damage they've done to their own agenda.... They'd implode probably double down and continue the cycle. It's the people more than it is their actual agenda. The people are the problem, here.
*fuckhead is one word and hyphens are useful. Fuck head woman hater vs. fuckhead woman-hater. Unless they want to encourage someone to fuck the hate woman-haters? Keep ur government! Urrrr, brzzzap, derp.

Their inner creepiness and ugliness shines through in most everything they create.
 
*fuckhead is one word and hyphens are useful. Fuck head woman hater vs. fuckhead woman-hater. Unless they want to encourage someone to fuck the hate woman-haters? Is she literally begging for it there? Keep ur government! Urrrr, brzzzap, derp.
You see this style in a lot of incompetently designed protest accessories. They're biting off that style you saw during the spanish revolution, you know the deal. The grammatical blunders make that poster's rage sound so fucking impotent, don't they? Good lord.
Al%20Front.jpg
 
For some reason, cutting off your own tits being allegorically represented by amputating your own wings (aka your own LIMBS, that would be like amputating your arms or legs) disturbs me a little. Just a spergy thought
I once saw a guy on Jerry Springer who amputated his legs with a chainsaw because he hated them and thought he should've been born without them, and immediately thought "what's the difference between this guy and a troon?" So it's absolutely fitting to compare someone who cuts off an essential limb to please their mental illness as one who cuts off their tits/dick to please their mental illness.
 
I once saw a guy on Jerry Springer who amputated his legs with a chainsaw because he hated them and thought he should've been born without them, and immediately thought "what's the difference between this guy and a troon?" So it's absolutely fitting to compare someone who cuts off an essential limb to please their mental illness as one who cuts off their tits/dick to please their mental illness.

It's tempting to go through a listing of freaks Springer has featured on his show and see how many of them are now a protected class or in line to become one.
 
A lot of words for just saying "Dear White Allies: Don't give me money. Fuck you."
No it’s, give us money but don’t take our clothes. Just give us money and virtue signal/shut the fuck up.

If I ever came across this sign in a store, I’d walk right out and never buy anything again. I doubt I’d ever find myself in such a store to begin with because I don’t buy garbage clothes.
 
If there was a single black worker at Chernobyl I’d be surprised. The black population in Ukraine is tiny (and does face quite a bit of racism.) I’m all for accurate reflection of a population, but shoehorning people in for the sake of it just doesn’t work.

The only "black people" that could possibly have been at Chernobyl would have been anyone that got cooked.


View attachment 798954

I refuse to give money to anyone, let alone Nigs, Peyutes, and Pakis, and I especially don't gie anyone money unless I'm getting something in return.

Edit to dodge a double-post -



799378
799379


Apparently, Section 14 of the Ontario Human Rights Code permits open discrimination, in the name of representation.
I would have thought that completely contradicts the spirit of the Human Rights Code, but it apparently doesn't.

799388


Apparently, if you're "under-represented", it's 100% okay to discriminate against white people, or anyone that's more represented, as far as I can tell from reading the above.
 
Last edited:
Apologies for the double post, but the subject was different enough, and you walk away from KF for a couple of days and threads race away... Anyhow...

What twisted world do these people live in? I'd love to laugh at this person in real life.

A woman being naive or vulnerable hooks into men in a big way, not for predatory reasons, but because of one of the primary male virtues: We want to protect women and children. It's visceral. Except soyboys and predators (and their heavy overlap), I don't know a man who doesn't want to throw punches at any random guy whenever he sees a woman feel vulnerable. Lucky there's civilization in the way. People taking one of the most noble, self-sacrificing, and loving virtues which define men, and vilifying and degrading it. What ugly people.

Worse than that.

They upgraded the ways in which it can be weaponized.

Racism/Sexism = Bias + Power/Privilege is just a new iteration of "I don't care how often she hits you, you never raise your hand to a woman". Are you really surprised that certain ideologies took that ingrained thinking to it's next logical conclusion and passed out a dogma, designed to exploit it, to it's intersectional proxies?
They can say and do whatever they want to you, and you aren't allowed to fight back or defend yourself, let alone strike at any inequalities you yourself are facing in the context of modern society. "You can't talk back to me, I'm always vulnerable because I'm a woman/POC/gay/trans you cis-het-white-male! Reeeeee!"

I think it's also kind of preying on the culturally ingrained desire to achieve godliness through martyrdom, but I'll save the white (male) Jesus rant for another day.

"You are a man. You are supposed to take it and if you can't you aren't really a man. She is smol and halpless. You can't do anything that might hurt her. Not even her feelings because if you do you are a big meany and real men will don their shining armor to defend her from you, you cur! Now get up on your cross, bitch!"

That's not a fluke. It's a feature of the system.

You will probably have to work past it some day, or be crushed by a bunch of imported camel fuckers who made guardianship laws their solution to that issue, and had the foresight to make suicidal incel martyrs useful by slapping dynamite on them as a condition to get their greasy nubbins on 72 slices of unblemished ham.

Personally, I'd like to see what would happen if western civilization actually moved away from double standards, but that's because I don't think we've had any real examples of that yet.

Call it curiosity.

The Human Stain is reverse?

It's nice to know someone else has seen that movie.
 
Back