Manosphere Fschmidt / Franklin Richard Schmidt - Loveshy God

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Fschmidt (in response to Marjan) said:
Both the Western Left and Right are totally confused. The Left is still fighting traditional Western culture which is long dead, and the Right is defending the same dead culture. If some Europeans want to try to resurrect traditional Western culture, that would be great but they basically have to rebuild the culture from scratch. As it is now, the Western Left and Right look hopeless and well deserve to be replaced by Islam.
 
Fschmidt said:
If you look up Nextag, you will see that it was valued at $1.2 billion. What did Tashbook get for making Nextag so valuable? He is currently in federal prison for unlawful sexual conduct. He tried to kidnap a girl using the Internet to be his sex slave.
Okay, what does Tashbook making a company successful have to do with his arrest and incarceration for being a sexual predator?
 
Okay, what does Tashbook making a company successful have to do with his arrest and incarceration for being a sexual predator?

I'm assuming he's one of those people who believes that financially successful people should be allowed to do whatever they want, because they contributions to society outweigh their personal crimes. It's a very late-1800s way of thinking.
 
I'm assuming he's one of those people who believes that financially successful people should be allowed to do whatever they want, because they contributions to society outweigh their personal crimes. It's a very late-1800s way of thinking.
So everyone in the 1800s was retarded? Huh, learn something new every day.
 
I'm assuming he's one of those people who believes that financially successful people should be allowed to do whatever they want, because they contributions to society outweigh their personal crimes. It's a very late-1800s way of thinking.

Makes you wonder what Fschmidt wishes he could be doing, if only those pesky laws weren't in his way.
 
I assume the same things Marijan would do except fshit is smart enough to not admit it publically.

Given his views on rape, I wouldn't be terribly surprised.

Fschmidt said:
My concern for level of pain of rape would be greater if it weren't for the fact that most American women deserve to raped because they oppose prostitution as a sexual outlet for men. Since they deserve to raped, I cannot concern myself with the pain rape causes them.

Fschmidt said:
This is simply liberal feminist propaganda. Feminist cannot except the truth that rape is quite simply about filling a biological need. Feminists much prefer this myth which is designed to demonize rapists.

Oh, and speaking of Marjan, this explains why he's so against the idea of women voting.

Fschmidt said:
There is nothing wrong with women voting as long as they don't vote with men. In other words, separate but equal is fine where women vote on laws and government for women and men do the same for men. But when the sexes are combined, women will vote for unlimited license and to enslave men, and men who naturally suck up to women will support them, and this coalition destroys society.

As Thomas Jefferson said:

"Were our State a pure democracy, . . . there would yet be excluded from their deliberations, women, who, to prevent depravation of morals and ambiguity of issue, could not mix promiscuously in the public meetings of men."

Fschmidt said:
My concrete political suggestion is, of course, impractical fantasy at this point. But it is still concrete. It is that men and women should never vote in the same election. There should be a government of men elected by men. Women should have an option either to submit to the government of men or to run their own government to govern themselves. The main thing is that women should never be allowed to impose their political will on men. If women want equality, they can have it in their own government. I suspect that women would actually have no interest in this because women don't actually want equality, what they want is to impose their will on men. Women have no interest in passing laws that only restrict their own behavior.

Now for the practical. Religion is the practical solution. A sound religion does not allow women to impose their will on men. Examples include the Catholic Church, Eastern Orthodox Church, and Orthodox Judaism. Those who are repulsed by the abuses of feminism should be a member of such a religion. In my group in El Paso, if it ever grows in size, I will put my suggestion above into practice. Women in the group who want equality can organize their own subgroup for women.

Fschmidt said:
Thank you for reminding me of why I gave up on modern Christianity. For you, as with all modern women, not allowing women to subjugate men through the vote is considered subjugation of women. This logic is so twisted that a response is pointless. What I would like to point out to any reasonable Christians reading this is that Christian countries currently are the most immoral countries in the world with the highest illegitimacy rates and least stable families. It is hard to blame Christianity itself since, in former times, Christian society was highly moral. So I ask Christians to consider what went wrong with Christianity? How did Christianity go from creating the most moral societies to now creating the most immoral societies? Certainly women's suffrage, in its current form, played a large role in this. So did abandoning other biblical principles like keeping the sabbath. For those Christians who believe that faith, by itself, is not enough, that one must also adhere to biblical morality, I ask you to please look at my website in my original post and give me feedback.

Fschmidt said:
Women who dress provocatively are showing worst inconsideration of men. They are selfishly feeding their ego at men's expense. Not only do they cause discomfort to men, but they cause men to lower their own morals because men will naturally pursue women when provoked and will go into an immoral mode to do this. Men's behavior is entirely different in a men-only environment versus when women are present, and the best moral behavior of men comes out only when women are not present.

Women, by nature, do not understand this and do not want to understand this. So giving women the power to vote over men is a recipe for disaster. I am for equality, but by this I mean separate equality. Women should rule/preach to women, never to men. And ideally men should only rule other men. The sexes should be kept separate outside the family as much as possible in order to promote general morality. And by this, I don't just mean sexual morality, I mean don't steal and don't kill. There is no doubt in my mind that the theft of the public treasury by the bankers of the western world is a direct result of feminism.

Fschmidt said:
I don't support all traditions, but I do oppose virtually all modern values. Of the ones you listed here, religion should influence local politics, and national power should be minimized so that it hardly matters. Women should not vote. Women's suffrage is probably the greatest tragedy in human history.

He's too unintelligent to come up with his own insane theories, so he has to get them second-hand from Fschmidt.
 
You'll never be banned here, Schmidtty! You're our official Forum's Creepy Uncle now.

I don't think Holden should be banned either. They have a way of unifying the community that can be found nowhere else.

I often think that it's counterproductive to block people with really, really shitty opinions. Instead, we should forever store those messages. From the horse's mouth. This is their legacy.

I mean, I've sometimes read some of the shit reformed lolcows posted ages ago, and compare it to what they're saying now. It gives me hope for humanity.
...then I see people who keep spewing this shit for decades and decades. Goddamn it.

It's astonishing how people grow up when people point out that what they're saying could be forever remembered. They might actually start saying clueful things that far outweigh the stupid things they said in the past.
Not some people, though. They just keep going.
 
I'm assuming he's one of those people who believes that financially successful people should be allowed to do whatever they want, because they contributions to society outweigh their personal crimes. It's a very late-1800s way of thinking.
Well Fschmidt did contribute financially to the first Ron Paul presidential campaign, and is a member of the El Paso chapter of the John Birch society.
 
Holden isn't the only one with a character page on TV Trope's Fundies Say the Darndest Things page.

"My concern for level of pain of rape would be greater if it weren't for the fact that most American women deserve to raped because they oppose prostitution as a sexual outlet for men. Since they deserve to raped, I cannot concern myself with the pain rape causes them."
Source


fschmidt is an incredibily misogynist individual, who's said that rape victims either got their due or contributed to their ordeal.


He also sees women as lesser than men and unworthy of having any rights (e.g. the right to vote).


In short, the ideal husband for Femitheist Divine if he wasn't already married to Lina H. Schmidt.


Has a forum, CoAlpha Brotherhood and co-founded the online selling company NexTag.com, Inc.


Is friends with thatincelblogger, with whom he shares many ideas about gender dynamics.


Habitat: Love-Shy, CoAlpha Brotherhood


Quotes here.




 
I wonder if this dude is ever coming back, or we scared him away and he's now crying with his rape sheckles
 
I'm assuming he's one of those people who believes that financially successful people should be allowed to do whatever they want, because they contributions to society outweigh their personal crimes. It's a very late-1800s way of thinking.

That makes sense then, because that's about when he would have grown up right?
 
I wonder if this dude is ever coming back, or we scared him away and he's now crying with his rape sheckles

For all our sakes, let's hope he DOESN'T come back. He used to run his big rape apologist mouth every chance he got at one of the other message boards I regularly visit and it made everybody else there want to punch his lights out. Fschmidt-- or "Fshit" as I like to call him --is misogyny and hate incarnate.
 
For all our sakes, let's hope he DOESN'T come back. He used to run his big rape apologist mouth every chance he got at one of the other message boards I regularly visit and it made everybody else there want to punch his lights out. Fschmidt-- or "Fshit" as I like to call him --is misogyny and hate incarnate.
He's Jewish, so I can have an excuse to have anti semitic jokes
 
For all our sakes, let's hope he DOESN'T come back. He used to run his big rape apologist mouth every chance he got at one of the other message boards I regularly visit and it made everybody else there want to punch his lights out. Fschmidt-- or "Fshit" as I like to call him --is misogyny and hate incarnate.
We took down Holden to hilarious results. We can handle a bored old fogey waiting for the early bird special.
 
So I see we have a new Holden.
I apologize to you all, I love you, but please do not tag me or anything unless it's super necessary. I really don't think I can handle yet another Holden-type person.
I think you're fine. He seems to have putzed back to the Old Country Buffet or wherever he runs off to. We won before it even became a thing.
 
Back