U.N launches new plan to "identify, prevent, and confront" Hate Speech



“Hate speech may have gained a foothold, but it is now on notice”, Mr. Guterres said, launching the UN Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speech. “We will never stop confronting it”.

image560x340cropped.jpg

Secretary-General António Guterres makes remarks at the Launch of the United Nations Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speech meeting. (18 June 2019), by UN Photo/Manuel Elias
While the strategy and action plan are new, it is also rooted in the need to respect the human rights of all, barring any discrimination.

The UN Charter was drafted after the world had witnessed genocide on an industrial scale, when hate speech against Jews, culminated in the Holocaust. Almost 75 years on, Mr. Guterres reminded delegates gathered at UN Headquarters in New York, that “we are in danger of forgetting this lesson”.

“Around the world, we see a groundswell of xenophobia, racism and intolerance, violent misogyny, anti-Semitism and anti-Muslim hatred” he stated, noting that in some places, Christian communities were also being systematically attacked.

Moreover, “hateful and destructive views” are amplified “exponentially” through digital technology and extremists are gathering online, radicalizing new recruits, according to the UN chief.

“In both liberal democracies and authoritarian regimes, some political leaders are bringing the hate-fueled ideas and language of these groups into the mainstream, normalizing them, coarsening the public discourse and weakening the social fabric”, he spelled out.

In both liberal democracies and authoritarian regimes, some political leaders are bringing the hate-fueled ideas and language of these groups into the mainstream – UN chief
Hate speech not only attacks human rights norms and principles, it also undermines social cohesion, erodes shared values and lays the foundation for violence – setting back the cause of peace, stability, sustainable development and the fulfillment of human rights for all.

Mr. Guterres dubbed hate speech a “precursor” to the genocide in Rwanda, Bosnia, Cambodia and recent mass-violence directed at places of worship, in Sri Lanka, New Zealand and the United States.

Keep hate speech from escalating
The UN Strategy and Plan of Action provides a system-wide programme with the overriding objective of identifying, preventing and confronting hate speech, the Secretary-General said.

It targets “the root causes of hate speech, in line with my prevention vision”, he said, pointing out that these include tackling violence, marginalization, discrimination, and poverty, as well as bolstering weak state institutions.

While many of these are being addressed in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the new strategy goes further by recommending a coordinated response, such as identifying users of hate speech.

Secondly, the strategy aims to enable the UN to respond to “the impact of hate speech on societies”, Mr. Guterres explained, including by bringing individuals and groups together who have opposing views; working with traditional and social media platforms; and developing communications guidance.


While digital technology has provided new areas for hate speech to thrive, the UN chief maintained that “it can also help to monitor activity, target our response and build support for counter-narratives”, such as in proposals made last week by his High-Level Panel on Digital Cooperation.

“Addressing hate speech should never be confused with suppressing freedom of expression”, he asserted, but instead keep it from “escalating into something more dangerous, particularly incitement to discrimination, hostility and violence”.

The Secretary-General urged everyone to treat hate speech “like any other malicious act: by condemning it unconditionally; refusing to amplify it; countering it with the truth; and encouraging the perpetrators to change their behavior”.

Counter-narratives to ‘answer’ hate speech - Dieng
“Hate speech is a challenge from which no country is immune”, said Adama Dieng, Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide at the launch.

He elaborated that in line with the UN’s longstanding commitment to the protection, promotion and implementation of all international human rights standards, “the strategy and the plan of action never calls for restrictions of freedom of expression and opinion while addressing hate speech”.

By contrast, “it adopts a holistic approach that aims at tackling the whole life cycle of hate speech, from its roots causes to its impact on societies”, he continued.

Furthermore, Mr. Dieng said that the strategy considers “alternative, positive and counter-narratives” to be the “answer to hate speech”.

“We have no doubt” he emphasized that by implementing the strategy, we will “enhance the system-wide capacity to address hate speech”.

I guess the U.N. getting involved on trying to push liberal authoritarian shit is nothing new. More abolition of no-no words coming soon.

I also like the part where they are subtly hinting they are going to try to make more anti-racist propaganda.
 
This kind of censorship shit is so fucktarded it makes my head spin. Like, ostensibly, they're trying to prevent the Dylan Roofs and Brenton Tarrants of the world from getting radicalized, but this garbage is what radicalizes them. If you talk to real experts on the human psychology of violence, they'll tell you that violence is the last resort of a person who feels they have no other options. Like if you have a potentially violent person, a stalker or something like that, the last thing you want to do is back them into a corner. Someone doesn't wake up, read a Twitter thread about niggers or whatever, and immediately go shoot up a synagogue. Someone who hates Jews and thinks they're ruining the world only shoots up a synagogue out of ideological pique if they feel they have no other options to bring attention to the issue. If that person thinks they can "reach" people via terrible takes on Twitter, they don't have to go out in a giant ball of flame. They have much less dramatic and destructive options to pursue their goals. And the rest of society can counter their bullshit with, y'know, sane takes. So everyone wins.

I don't think it's a coincidence that far right political violence is increasing as leftist government and big tech censorship is taking off.
 
“Hate speech may have gained a foothold, but it is now on notice”, Mr. Guterres said, launching the UN Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speech. “We will never stop confronting it”.
The first line in the article, as spoken by the Secretary General outlines the problem and solution. Nothing else after this quote was necessary, including the soon-to-fail UN initiative.

You're never going to stop confronting hate speech. It's always going to be there. Get the fuck over it and don't feed the trolls if it really bothers you that much. If a person actually takes a swing at you or tries to blow up your car, they get arrested. What the fuck more can you do or expect? You want a camera in my house so you can see and hear what my family is saying?

Of course you fucking do.

The best part about my homeland is that it is my right to be better armed than your average UN "peacekeeper".
 
Only thing I know personally about UN is that my coworker used to get pension for getting shot in the leg in tune of almost 4g a month for last 25 years and now they cut it off because reasons.

His life accomplishment is producing ugliest offspring possible and getting shot in the leg with pension to his name.

Also he told me a black lady fucked him when he was 14.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This kind of censorship shit is so fucktarded it makes my head spin. Like, ostensibly, they're trying to prevent the Dylan Roofs and Brenton Tarrants of the world from getting radicalized, but this garbage is what radicalizes them. If you talk to real experts on the human psychology of violence, they'll tell you that violence is the last resort of a person who feels they have no other options. Like if you have a potentially violent person, a stalker or something like that, the last thing you want to do is back them into a corner. Someone doesn't wake up, read a Twitter thread about niggers or whatever, and immediately go shoot up a synagogue. Someone who hates Jews and thinks they're ruining the world only shoots up a synagogue out of ideological pique if they feel they have no other options to bring attention to the issue. If that person thinks they can "reach" people via terrible takes on Twitter, they don't have to go out in a giant ball of flame. They have much less dramatic and destructive options to pursue their goals. And the rest of society can counter their bullshit with, y'know, sane takes. So everyone wins.

I don't think it's a coincidence that far right political violence is increasing as leftist government and big tech censorship is taking off.
Have you considered that at least some people in these organizations might be purposefully trying to back people into a corner so they can crush them?
 
Why isn't UN dismantled yet? The UN that appointed Saudi Arabia as human rights council and also a den of pedophiles.
 
Oh well, there goes the Koran. [He says ironically....]
Notice that in his list of examples, where Guterres dubbed hate speech a “precursor” to the genocide in Rwanda, Bosnia, Cambodia and recent mass-violence directed at places of worship, in Sri Lanka, New Zealand and the United States, he did not mention one Muslim shithole - but I will help: Saudi Arabia,Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Iraq, Pakistan, Bangladesh.
This will just be another opportunity to beat up on whitey while the brown and black people continue doing what they want - but taking our aid all the same. The UN is a fucking racket.
Anyway, if Comrade Guterres wants to track back further to the origin of genocide, hate speech comes well down the track. Before that you have a whole bunch of ideas, upper most is that believing your ingroup are superior to the out group.
Colonialism, especially by the Brits, had a lot to be said for it. [tho, admittedly, it did not go so well in the US] At least the brown and blak people were not killing each other on the scale they are now.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid

The UN outlines a new campaign against “hate speech”

Archive
The United Nations (UN) is dishing out tips on social media to citizens around the world on how to “say no to hate” – specifically online, declaring at the same time that “words can be weapons” which lead to violence in real life.

Instead of dedicating all its energy to policing, through peacekeeping, warzones, and making sure international law and the UN Charter are respected by all its member-states, the UN seems to have plenty of time and resources to be policing online speech.

There have been instances of violent incidents/protests resulting in violence committed by individuals who, like billions of others, had a presence on social media.

And authorities have virtually every time sought to link their online behavior with that in the real world as a way to justify and keep stepping up the level of overall censorship, specifically related to accusations of “hate speech,” affecting all internet users.

Here, the UN has been trying to make itself a prominent “hub” for such policies going forward and is not averse to making blanket statements such as “hate speech is rising around the world.”

The formal framework that the UN is using to be able to engage in this “activism” – evident here in this recent tweet about “words as weapons” and how “online can lead to cruelty and violence in real life” – in the UN Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speech.

First devised in 2019, by 2021, UN chief Antonio Guterres, as quoted by the UN site, was using dramatic language like saying that fighting hateful language “must be a job for everyone.”

There is a whole section of the website dedicated to the topic of online hate speech that the UN links to things like preventing atrocities and genocide, supporting children, achieving gender equality, etc.

If you are by now concerned enough and see this issue as basically a key threat to societies around the globe, the UN offers a page containing “tips” on how to deal with hate speech – even, by their own admission, if you’re not sure it’s actually “hate speech.”

The tips sound a lot like what Big Tech social media platforms have been incorporating into their rules: “take a moment to pause before you share content online, fact-check, refute misinformation with facts, undermine hateful content with positive messages, extend solidarity to people who are the targets of hate speech,” and – report.

“Read social media platform guidelines and tips to protect users from harassment and hate speech,” says the UN, and if that fails and “that tweet” really upsets you – “notify organizations fighting hate speech and/or file a complaint with police (or the public prosecutor).”
 
There is no such thing as hate speech. It’s just speech. Some people hate each other and they always will. Stopping people speaking doesn’t make them magically love each other, but it certainly makes it easy to crack down on any form of dissent you don’t like.
But the very concept of hate speech needs to be confronted and dismantled. There’s just speech. Some of it is nice and some of it isn’t but all of it that’s legal should be allowed. Actions are what should be policed. Everything that should be illegal in the states already is illegal - I can’t go and make a direct threat to someone or a building and expect to not be followed up.
None of this is going to stop people hating each other. But it’s not supposed to. It’s just another tighter grip on language, expression and even thought. Thought is shaped by language, and cracking down hard on language with social feedback suppresses thought. They are going to try to remove anonymity and crack down in all forms of free expression. It’s nothing to do with genuine peace it’s about control
Anyway my right to say that the UN is at best I compete and at worst sinister and I do hope they’re hit by a large and precise meteor remains. I really hate them…
 
Im very happy about this! i, as a devote muslim was daily abused on twitter. My religion is very clear, gays get the rope, how can they allow other people to call me a homophone for that?
 
God bless them for reminding us of their mistaken continued existence. With all the other problems in the world and country, one might forget the importance in defunding the LoN 2.0 and putting hard limits on the ability of our people inside to help work against our own principles.
 
Back