Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Naturally, since animals can be gay, they also can run tumblrs and have headmates and want hormone therapy. This stuff happens in the wild all the time!

This makes me kind of worried that some loonies have tried to force this shit on their pets, thinking about it...
 
Naturally, since animals can be gay, they also can run tumblrs and have headmates and want hormone therapy. This stuff happens in the wild all the time!

This makes me kind of worried that some loonies have tried to force this shit on their pets, thinking about it...
Well, see, when you spay or neuter your pet you're actually helping them discover their transgender self, possibly even finding that they are in fact non-binary uwu!
 
In fairness they aren't wrong, Homosexuality does naturally occur in the wild in several mammal species including our close relatives apes and chimpanzees.

Don't know why that Sprout fucker is bringing up gender and TERFs though.

Natural hermaphrodites and "sex changing" animals are mostly invertaberes like worms and snails which are so far removed from humans they shouldn't even be considered.
Yeah. You want to talk about some other stuff that happens naturally in the wild, especially with our close relatives?

They have no concept of "Consent". They also happily murder one another over stupid shit. They're wild murderous rapists. They also fuck members of the same sex sometimes (Again, no consent). They also murder the young so they can have sex with the mother sometimes.

So... this is really the angle you want to go with? Gay people are like crazy raping monkeys?
 
Let's talk some more about that positive discrimination, I guess. STEM uni in Holland has declared that their academic positions will be opened to women first,

I am a woman (a real one) and in STEM and I think this is a crap idea. You want the best person for the job, and you don’t have many women on staff. The solution to that is not preventing men from applying. It’s asking WHY women aren’t hired. Because all of the following scenarios have different solutions.

Are women applying at all? If not, why? Is there something about the ad that’s uniquely targeted to men, or very off putting to women? Where are we advertising?

Are women applying but not getting interviews? Why? Qualified women not getting through is an issue. Can we block out names on resumes?

Are no qualified women applying? Why? Pipeline issue?

Are women getting interviewed but not being hired? Why?

Are women being offered the job and not accepting? Why?

So, so many things that you can do that are way more useful. Just ‘no men applying’ means you may miss the best candidate.

Of course you could just identify as a woman ...
 
I am a woman (a real one) and in STEM and I think this is a crap idea. You want the best person for the job, and you don’t have many women on staff. The solution to that is not preventing men from applying. It’s asking WHY women aren’t hired. Because all of the following scenarios have different solutions.

Are women applying at all? If not, why? Is there something about the ad that’s uniquely targeted to men, or very off putting to women? Where are we advertising?

Are women applying but not getting interviews? Why? Qualified women not getting through is an issue. Can we block out names on resumes?

Are no qualified women applying? Why? Pipeline issue?

Are women getting interviewed but not being hired? Why?

Are women being offered the job and not accepting? Why?

So, so many things that you can do that are way more useful. Just ‘no men applying’ means you may miss the best candidate.

Of course you could just identify as a woman ...

I remember James Damore asking very similar questions, and positing fairly common sense solutions. He got fired for his troubles.
 
Yeah. You want to talk about some other stuff that happens naturally in the wild, especially with our close relatives?

They have no concept of "Consent". They also happily murder one another over stupid shit. They're wild murderous rapists. They also fuck members of the same sex sometimes (Again, no consent). They also murder the young so they can have sex with the mother sometimes.

So... this is really the angle you want to go with? Gay people are like crazy raping monkeys?
You beat me to it. I was going to point out that just like homosexual behavior is "natural," so is the phenomenon of mom's boyfriend beating, molesting, and killing (and sometimes eating) mom's kids so he can have her to himself. Whee, natural!
 
I remember James Damore asking very similar questions, and positing fairly common sense solutions. He got fired for his troubles.

And then if a woman IS the best person and gets hired, she’s forever under the shadow of the hiring process. I really disagree with positive hiring done like this. Ask if your applicant pool is matching the society you live in, and if it isn’t, think why. Don’t just cut off half the qualified people who do apply. That’s the wrong point in the process.

May the anti woke backlash be swift...
 
You beat me to it. I was going to point out that just like homosexual behavior is "natural," so is the phenomenon of mom's boyfriend beating, molesting, and killing (and sometimes eating) mom's kids so he can have her to himself. Whee, natural!
Well, natural do not mean good. Nature is pretty freaky in reality.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vorhtbame
Well, natural do not mean good. Nature is pretty freaky in reality.
That's my whole point. Saying "well animals do it, SO THERE HOMOPHOBES" is asinine. Animals do all kinds of things, many of which we would find morally abhorrent, others of which we find cute and touching. It's irrelevant to the question of whether human homosexuality should be accepted, celebrated, whatever.
 
That's my whole point. Saying "well animals do it, SO THERE HOMOPHOBES" is asinine. Animals do all kinds of things, many of which we would find morally abhorrent, others of which we find cute and touching. It's irrelevant to the question of whether human homosexuality should be accepted, celebrated, whatever.
Exactly, it's like arguing that marijuana should be legal based upon the fact that it's "Just a plant, MAAN, so it's like, natural and nontoxic". While I agree with the conclusion the logic is fucking stupid. There are shitloads of deadly poisonous plants that are naturally going to kill you.
 
Entirely natural things:

Cancer
Botulinum toxin
Asbestos
Ricin
Dranunculus worms
Arsenic
Aconite

I have this argument regularly with the alternative meds/MLM shills
Aren't apricot kernels one of the fad "natural" products right now, despite them being loaded with cyanide?
 
Last edited:
Really? Frankly nothing would surprise me with the ‘chemical free!’ Crowd.

Edited to add: I dont have a problem with people being gay. I do have a problem with people exposing children to sexuality (gay or straight) and I’m seeing a real trend just now to use LGB stuff as the vehicle to do that. The middle aged entirely dull lesbian parents I know are as horrified as I am about kids being at pride. It’s not FOR children. They are pretty worried about a backlash against all this - the LGB need to kick out the rest of the alphabet soup and just get on with being boring normal people IMO.
 
Edited to add: I dont have a problem with people being gay. I do have a problem with people exposing children to sexuality (gay or straight) and I’m seeing a real trend just now to use LGB stuff as the vehicle to do that. The middle aged entirely dull lesbian parents I know are as horrified as I am about kids being at pride. It’s not FOR children. They are pretty worried about a backlash against all this - the LGB need to kick out the rest of the alphabet soup and just get on with being boring normal people IMO.
I guess the problem is that the LGBTQIAFUCKYOU community is completely and utterly “ruled” by intersectional feminists, thus the recent obsession with the narrative of “TRANS WOMXN OF COLOR GAVE CISWHITE GAY MEN THEIR RIGHTS SO SHUT THE FUCK UP NOW AND FOREVER!!!!!!”
 
Back