Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

5412086-6317165-image-m-70_1540490802441.jpg

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'


FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

FB_IMG_1540539738552.jpg
 
Last edited:
This is a consequence of atheism. People ignore the Bible verses that say that God created people male and female and that cross dressing is a sin.
B-b-but how do you know it's sinful?? Because the majority of these people are deeply conflicted and miserable and their suicide rate is through the roof??

What kind of proof is that?!
 
B-b-but how do you know it's sinful?? Because the majority of these people are deeply conflicted and miserable and their suicide rate is through the roof??

What kind of proof is that?!
Proof that Christianity is true proves that the Bible is true which proves that it is sinful. I made a thread on this site about evidence of Christianity. Tell me, what evidence of Christianity will convince you to convert and I will show you the evidence.
 
Proof that Christianity is true proves that the Bible is true which proves that it is sinful. I made a thread on this site about evidence of Christianity. Tell me, what evidence of Christianity will convince you to convert and I will show you the evidence.
I think you missed the not-so-subtle irony in my statement, friend. Read it again but imagine I'm an inveterate shit poster.

My point was that it clearly leads to suffering and madness, which might indicate to an observer that it is, indeed, sinful.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Y2K Baby
I think you missed the not-so-subtle irony in my statement, friend. Read it again but imagine I'm an inveterate shit poster.

My point was that it clearly leads to suffering and madness, which might indicate to an observer that it is, indeed, sinful.
But the Bible explains that on Earth, good things and bad things can happen to both good and bad people.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: s0mbra
But the Bible explains that on Earth, good things and bad things can happen to both good and bad people.
C'est vrai, oui. But the big guy also has a penchant for punishing sinners in this world (see the flood, Sodom and Gomorrah,et al.) Anyways it was a joke and dissecting it has now made both of us faggots. Isn't that a sin?
 
Should we get Styxhexenhammer out before we drop the bomb?
if you all could avoid my house too that'd be cool.

jokes aside, most normal Vermonters from all walks of life who I have spoken with about this are unimpressed with the whole thing. yes, many of them it's purely financial but not for all of them.
 
I'm admittedly a bit hungover and still working on my coffee here but are breasts 'genitals' in a strict sense of the term? What do tiddies have to do with reproduction?
Breasts are Secondary Sexual Characteristics, like beards.


Another internal memo of Google has leaked, and troons are outraged.

Google warns its employees that Pride protests are against the company’s code of conduct

A leaked internal memo has Googlers concerned about whose free speech the company is protecting
By Megan Farokhmanesh Jun 24, 2019, 6:03pm EDT

Employees are allowed to peacefully protest YouTube or Google during the Pride parade — as long as they are not marching with Google in an official capacity. According to internal memos sent to employees, anyone who chooses to walk the parade as a representative of Google and voice any protest will be considered in violation of Google’s code of conduct.

The discussion came out of a broader conversation among the Gayglers listserv, one of Google’s LGBTQ groups, about petitioning San Francisco Pride to remove the company’s float from this weekend’s parade. Some employees planned to march with Google, while also visibly demonstrating against YouTube’s recent policy decisions with signs or t-shirts. According to screenshots shared with The Verge, when one Googler asked if this would be tolerated by the company, an inclusion lead said no.

“Employees are free to make whatever statement they want personally, apart from our corporate sponsored float/contingent,” the inclusion lead told the member of Gayglers. “But they are not permitted to leverage our platform to express a message contradictory to the one Google is expressing.”

Internally, LGBTQ employees at Google have expressed anger and exhaustion over YouTube’s recent policy decisions regarding conservative YouTuber Steven Crowder and Vox journalist and video host Carlos Maza, which earlier this month became a flashpoint in the ongoing controversy over how YouTube moderates its platform and decides when and for what offense it punishes certain channel owners. In a recent letter to Google’s LGBTQ employees, CEO Sundar Pichai said that he echoes YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki’s recent apology to the community, and vowed that the company would be taking “a hard look” at its harassment policies.

The decision to stifle a would-be protest is frustrating to some employees, who see it as especially ironic given YouTube’s dedication to free speech. “YouTubers who use our platform and sometimes get significant revenue get to claim free speech to keep using our platform ... but LGBT Googlers get no free speech to say that Google doesn’t represent us,” one tells The Verge. “That’s ironic at best, but hypocritical ... specifically ironic trying to curb our speech on the 50th anniversary of the Stonewall march riots.”

815669


How exactly employees would be punished is unclear. When one employee asked for clarification, the original poster of Google’s decision said that employees would need to contact the Code of Conduct team for any further questions.

Although employees are allowed to do so outside of company groups, some employees say it’s too late for them to participate in official Pride parades in any other capacity. With Pride month drawing to a close, these cities and many others will hold their official festivities at the end of June. For employees getting ready to celebrate Pride, one tells The Verge, “this means that in practice you either protest or you march.”

Google was not immediately available for comment.
It should be clear that it is not a "free speech" issue; Googlings are absolutely free to display their sexual fuck-ups in public, but they are not allowed to brandish the Google brand when they do so. If they wish to march under the Google-sponsored float, then they can't protest against Youtube.

But, of course trannies are unable to separate their private and emotional lives from their work lives (if they had a work life at all).

815665

They hate it when corporations sponsor their pride; they hate it when corporations wash their hands off their pride. There is no pleasing the mentally ill.
 
Breasts are Secondary Sexual Characteristics, like beards.


Another internal memo of Google has leaked, and troons are outraged.


It should be clear that it is not a "free speech" issue; Googlings are absolutely free to display their sexual fuck-ups in public, but they are not allowed to brandish the Google brand when they do so. If they wish to march under the Google-sponsored float, then they can't protest against Youtube.

But, of course trannies are unable to separate their private and emotional lives from their work lives (if they had a work life at all).

View attachment 815665
They hate it when corporations sponsor their pride; they hate it when corporations wash their hands off their pride. There is no pleasing the mentally ill.

this is a whole new level of stupid.

corporation: "You have free reign to bitch about your company, just don't do it on a literal parade float during an unrelated city-wide public celebration"
employee: "FUCK YOU TRANSPHOBES"
 
this is a whole new level of stupid.

corporation: "You have free reign to bitch about your company, just don't do it on a literal parade float during an unrelated city-wide public celebration"
employee: "FUCK YOU TRANSPHOBES"
Nah, it's "you have free rein to bitch about your company, including on a literal parade float during an unrelated city-wide public celebration, as long as it isn't the float of the company you're bitching about"
"REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
 
many expressed concern that some of their trans-related content, such as sexual education videos, has been limited from making money from ads or was age restricted.

So, do they want their graphic “sex ed” videos and clips of them shooting up testosterone with syringes to be available to children?

That’s just plain horrifying.
 
While I'm not overly not familiar with Vermont's legislative makeup, ( :optimistic: :optimistic: :optimistic: ) this seems like a bill to virtue signal to the Democratic base or an important donor. It doesn't not read like something that was designed to, or that will, make it out of committee let alone floor debate if it does get out of committee.

Oregon has had a similar law* on the books for a few years now, and knowing Vermont, I can totally buy this shit. Vermont had a troon running as the Dem candidate for governor last year, David “Christine” Hallquist. Hallquist is your typical old white dude troon— a CEO and closet cross dresser, married with kids, who took the big T plunge in his 50s.

*In Oregon, medical consent begins at age 15 (no parental notification required) and thanks to the 2015 law they can now get hormones and surgeries related to gender dysphoria— including elective mastectomies— paid for by the state’s Oregon Health Plan.
 
Proof that Christianity is true proves that the Bible is true which proves that it is sinful. I made a thread on this site about evidence of Christianity. Tell me, what evidence of Christianity will convince you to convert and I will show you the evidence.
Dude, your lolcow thread contains YOU trying to convince everyone of your evidence, followed by you admitted you don't even believe your own stupid evidence, followed by some weird schizo breakdown (sorry man your psych doctor is a hack), followed by you deciding to go back to being catholic to avoid some weird anxiety.

You had no evidence, which you yourself realized. Why are you looping back to this? We already did this, just stick with shitposting and being funny.

B-b-but how do you know it's sinful?? Because the majority of these people are deeply conflicted and miserable and their suicide rate is through the roof??

What kind of proof is that?!
Are you talking about atheists or trans people? Because I've not seen any such statistics about atheists, nor have I seen evidence than trans people are more likely to be atheist than anyone else.

Wearing mixed fibers is sinful. Eating a cheeseburger is sinful. Disrespecting your parents is sinful. Coveting your neighbor's wife is sinful.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: s0mbra and Y2K Baby
Back