Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

How to call ALL them bitches fat and get away with it: the graphic novel.


The harsh cold truth - A graphic novel by Nick Rekieta with Ya Boi Zack.

I wish Nick got deposed. Reading 6 hours of 'yes, I've called him a cuck', 'yes, I've called her fat', 'no, I am not employed by Vic or BHBH', 'Yes, I do hope that Vic wins the case and am biased in his favour' would be a fucking riot. What would they do to him aside from asking easily dismissed questions on agency and employment - did he laugh at armzgurl swastika hands? Did he call everyone on the other side of the fence a dummy? Fuck yes he did, made bank doing it, and will do it again reading the transcript of his own deposition.

Nick: "yes, I've called him a cuck', 'yes, I've called her fat', 'no, I am not employed by Vic or BHBH', 'Yes, I do hope that Vic wins the case and am biased in his favour."
Ty Beard: "Please add into the transcript that the defendants stenographer had to be released of his duty, because he almost suffocated from laughter."
 
I want to know their identities so I can send them lots of free pizza to help them with their trauma. I think most people here agree with this.

I'd dox myself everywhere if it meant I got free pizza.


That's such an insane statement. Just because Casey is using it as a desperate attempt to defend his stupid clients doesn't mean it's actually true. If I said "Monica murdered 15 people who've gone missing and buried their bodies where no one will find them" that's not magically a statement of opinion because it can't be proven, anymore than saying "the surface of the sun is hot" is an opinion because we can't put a thermometer on it.
 
They're so behind that they talked about Nick and Duck Dynasty's little non-spat months after it was over.

OK, months after it happened. But still.

They're resorting to the public figure argument. I mean, BHBH has already implied that they've prepared for that argument also.
 
Wait, you mean to tell me that people should assume innocence until proven guilty with evidence? Well, guess that doesnt apply if some Twitter thots call you a rapist. The fucking mental gymnastics and hypocrisy here are outstanding.

Innocence is presumed with defamation, TI, conspiracy, and nothing else.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Questioning_Huggers
I know people have not kept abreast on the Know Your Meme article, but during my vacation the troll known as vit sperged the image gallery.
The KYM users in comments section lambasted him relentlessly until a mod got involved:


Jill (Mod).PNG


So, the comments section, video gallery, and image gallery are locked now.
 
Hey, I wouldn't be at all surprised if they tried exactly that.

I doubt the outcome would be any better than you'd think, and honestly, the absolute worst thing the defense could do would be to have Nick Rekieta as an actual witness, considering his general persuasive abilities.

I can't imagine a worse idea for the defense. I can't believe Cohen suggested it. Nick is entertaining enough to have thousands listen to him talk 5 nights a week for hours about the exact case they are talking about calling him for. He would have the jury wrapped around his finger and would have experience with how to field questions from lawyers in a case.
 
I know people have not kept abreast on the Know Your Meme article, but during my vacation the troll known as vit sperged the image gallery.
The KYM users in comments section lambasted him relentlessly until a mod got involved:


View attachment 815293

So, the comments section, video gallery, and image gallery are locked now.

You have to be a special kind of exceptional to get banned off of kym.
 
Last edited:
okay i'm gonna go out on a limb and give Cohen, AND ONLY HIM, a lot of credit here and suggest something: What if he is secretly very much against Kickvic and that is why he is going out of his way to give them stupid or outright false legal advice? It would be still incredibly stupid because he is hurting his own credibility but i just refuse to believe that everybody these people try to reel in and never talked to before happens to be just as much of a moron as they are.
 

This is a civil matter. The accuser has to prove that he was damaged in some way and that the defendant was the damaging party. Showing the harm is quite easy. Oh and stating "Vic is a sexual
I can't imagine a worse idea for the defense. I can't believe Cohen suggested it. Nick is entertaining enough to have thousands listen to him talk 5 nights a week for hours about the exact case they are talking about calling him for. He would have the jury wrapped around his finger and would have experience with how to field questions from lawyers in a case.

I can think of one worse thing. Submitting links to Nick’s video’s as part of your defense filings. This way the Judge gets to watch all of Nick’s compelling arguments without any possibility of rebuttal from yourself. But seriously you would have to be a complete fucking idiot of a lawyer to do that now wouldn’t you?
 
okay i'm gonna go out on a limb and give Cohen, AND ONLY HIM, a lot of credit here and suggest something: What if he is secretly very much against Kickvic and that is why he is going out of his way to give them stupid or outright false legal advice? It would be still incredibly stupid because he is hurting his own credibility but i just refuse to believe that everybody these people try to reel in and never talked to before happens to be just as much of a moron as they are.

I wrote him off as yet another case of subversion from a certain group of people and ignored everything that came out of his mouth.
 
Back