- Joined
- May 13, 2019
AHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH
When did the internet get so damn soft?
She's been flapping that man jaw about this and getting people to come forward with half-assed stories. She's pretty much in TI territory now.
View attachment 819477
![]()
Ghost of Conventions Past: #Metoo Edition on Twitter: "In 2007, Vic M…
archived 28 Jun 2019 19:14:42 UTCarchive.li
Like this crap isn't easy to debunk.
Don't let the door hit you on the way out, bitch!Seems like somebody is reaping the fruits of that Karma tree.
View attachment 819647
![]()
Sarah 🐝 Wiedenheft on Twitter: "if instead of spreading positivity, …
archived 28 Jun 2019 07:31:01 UTCarchive.fo
Vic used a rapejutsu talisman to hypnotize her into coming back in 2010. That's the only possible explanation.I absolutely believe the Crimson Chin on this one. Vic absolutely stalked Iijima and ran a pedo train through Tekko 2007 that all the convention staff knew about.
That's why both attended Tekko 2010.
Its hard to say exactly, but it definitely became more prominent when being offended gave the offended an implicit form of social power over the offender. Things seem to be swinging away from that mentality a little (CD Projekt Red telling whiners to bug off) but its still in limited instances.
All I can say on the matter to avoid going too off topic.
These are people that believe someones word alone is all the evidence they need in this case. I'm going to go out on a limb and say their brilliant strategy going forward is to use the sworn statements to prove people were accusing Vic of being a predator back in 2007 so everything the defendants said can't be defamatory. Basically the same bs they've been running with only this time they're going to try using sworn affidavits to back them up.If all of that were true shouldn't it have been filed somewhere along with other reports? I suppose by now they can just say it was destroyed so no evidence. Probably can't get any written documents from security staff detailing the incident, can't get in contact with the three girls to give their side of the story, the person running the convention seems to refute the story also so....
Where is the evidence? Can't do anything in court on hearsay, needs actual evidence, victim testimony and so on. Either produce evidence or fuck off and stop being an attention seeking cunt.
What they don't seem to get is that an affadavit isn't a silver bullet but a double eedge sword. It means you're willing to, under threat of perjury, go down and testify it's as you say. The problem is, you still have to nut up and get deposed and grilled on your statement that you now cannot walk back on because you'd perjure yourself, assuming it doesn't get tossed out right away as hearsay due to being a second/third/fourthhand account.These are people that believe someones word alone is all the evidence they need in this case. I'm going to go out on a limb and say their brilliant strategy going forward is to use the sworn statements to prove people were accusing Vic of being a predator back in 2007 so everything the defendants said can't be defamatory. Basically the same bs they've been running with only this time they're going to try using sworn affidavits to back them up.
These are people that believe someones word alone is all the evidence they need in this case. I'm going to go out on a limb and say their brilliant strategy going forward is to use the sworn statements to prove people were accusing Vic of being a predator back in 2007 so everything the defendants said can't be defamatory. Basically the same bs they've been running with only this time they're going to try using sworn affidavits to back them up.
What they don't seem to get is that an affadavit isn't a silver bullet but a double eedge sword. It means you're willing to, under threat of perjury, go down and testify it's as you say. The problem is, you still have to nut up and get deposed and grilled on your statement that you now cannot walk back on because you'd perjure yourself, assuming it doesn't get tossed out right away as hearsay due to being a second/third/fourthhand account.
Also, better hope the ones making the affadavit weren't part of the exceptional gayops discord because that'd be perjury AND seal the deal on civil conspiracy.
Yes, and they had to pay 44 million in damages for it.Tell me, has a social justice warrior ever gone IRL to double down on the beliefs they’ve made online, even if it wasn’t in a courthouse?
Sure. Russian Deadpool, the wokest of male feminists, relieved his girlfriend of the superhomosogynistictransislamophobic horror of ever having to suffer under the evil white male cis hetero christian patriarchy ever again.Tell me, has a social justice warrior ever gone IRL to double down on the beliefs they’ve made online, even if it wasn’t in a courthouse?
I don't know who that is but the take away I'm getting is that he killed her.Sure. Russian Deadpool, the wokest of male feminists, relieved his girlfriend of the superhomosogynistictransislamophobic horror of ever having to suffer under the evil white male cis hetero christian patriarchy ever again.
Bassets are gud bois. Dey dindu nuffinz.I don't know who that is but the take away I'm getting is that he killed her.
Yup. He was your typical online male feminist/skeptic. AKA an idiot with delusions of self importance.I don't know who that is but the take away I'm getting is that he killed her.
The replies on her Twitter are godly.Holy shit