It will never stop being hilarious to me that troons get so offended at ANY man wearing feminine clothes. It's almost like they know. Anyway, "Dude Looks Like a Lady" is about fucking Vince Neal. Being literally Vince Neal is transphobic now too.
They DO know. They know it's all a ruse. But they all know deep down that they're just men in fucking skirts, and look like it too. Why else would they get so angry at cross dressers and call any dude who's even the slightest bit effeminate an "egg" (someone who hasn't trooned out yet)?
Speaking of Reddit.I'm sure you guys know about this, but it is my new toy since I just recently learned of it. I'm talking about Revditt, where you go to any Reddit url, including your own user name, and drop a "v" in the url to see what has been deleted and why. It also gives you a good idea of what key words are being auto-banned.
So for a trans subreddit here is one example: https://www.revddit.com/r/trans/if i had a weiner i would not delete it/don't hate biches REVDITT WARNING like I said this is a new one for me and some things remain best UNSEEN, so please take care, I have no idea what is behind some of those deleted posts. The Reddit trans community is a good one to view moderations since there is naturally a high troll rate for the topic.
If you don't see any flaps, it's a frankenpussy. Genitalia isn't supposed to be cute but you'll notice that neovaginas quite literally look like swollen open sores. What I really wanna know is how many guys on grindr get unsolicited frankentool pics.
Of course it does, and Lena is a POS. But women commit 2% of sexual assaults and an even more minuscule percentage of that is incest. So just like a couple hundred thousand intersex folk doesn't make trannies valid, let's not be dishonest and pretend that women are just as likely to commit rape. Female rapists are statistical outliers/anomalies, so it's a fair assumption to say that a tranny dude is far more likely to commit rape, as this mf did right here. I'm still blown away that it took multiple people in the comments trying to tell him he just committed a crime for him to actually get it.
View attachment 825825
Diversity and intersectionality are words that were never meant to include mentally ill people like troons. They really cannot stfu any time things don't center 100% around validating them lmao.
Nah, they refer to themselves as F2M and it doesn't look surgical. I think its more hormones causing atypical development and growth, opposite of how estrogen causes the penis to atrophy.
Nah, they refer to themselves as F2M and it doesn't look surgical. I think its more hormones causing atypical development and growth, opposite of how estrogen causes the penis to atrophy.
Are you referring to neopenises? They take skin from the forearm and fashion it into a phallus. And it looks fucking repulsive. I've never heard of synthetic testosterone causing their vaginas to enlarge/shrink as a result of the hormones.
That guy saying incest fetishes are now common in troon circles surprises me not at all.
In 10-20 years when the real stories start emerging about the abuse these men are engaging in against their children, people will act so shocked and like no one could have ever known.
Why do people still go along with this? Why do you call a man in a dress a trans woman? That's no kind of woman at all. It's a man in a dress, with maybe a side of genital mutilation.
We don't call paranoid schizophrenics trans fugitives, we call them paranoid schizophrenics. No, actually, nobody is out to get you and the FBI isn't sending messages to your fillings (Probably). No, actually, cutting off your penis didn't magically transform your dna, you're a man with a cut off penis now.
Of course it does, and Lena is a POS. But women commit 2% of sexual assaults and an even more minuscule percentage of that is incest. So just like a couple hundred thousand intersex folk doesn't make trannies valid, let's not be dishonest and pretend that women are just as likely to commit rape. Female rapists are statistical outliers/anomalies, so it's a fair assumption to say that a tranny dude is far more likely to commit rape, as this mf did right here. I'm still blown away that it took multiple people in the comments trying to tell him he just committed a crime for him to actually get it.
In the 2001 national Youth Risk Behavior Survey, 10.2% of girls and 5.1% of boys reported "[having] ever been physically forced to have sexual intercourse when [they] did not want to".[4] In a 2010 study of heterosexual couples where sexual coercion existed, 45% reported female victimization, 30% reported male victimization and 20% reported reciprocal victimization.[5] In 2011, a study supported by a research grant from the Department of Education and Science of Spain found based on a "convenience sample of 13,877 students in 32 nations" that 2.4% of males and 1.8% of females admitted to having physically forced someone into having sex in the last year.[6]In a 2014 study of 18,030 high school students, there was no statistically significant difference between males and females for the reported rate of having been physically forced to have sex.[7]
Nope. What you're looking at is reporting bias. When you ask the right questions that get around personal definitions and excuses for rape you find that
2.4% of males and 1.8% of females admitted to having physically forced someone into having sex in the last year.
The difference is, 0.005% of those males forced to have sex will report it as a rape. 500% of the women forced to have sex will report it as rape (OK maybe that's off a bit but I'm trying to account for false accusations).
So the police see the vast vast majority of rape complaints are made against men. That proves men report being raped less than women, and nothing else. When you add more data, the picture gets clearer.
But a woman who says she was raped doesn't get told "No, if you were able to have sex it wasn't rape" or "LOL you're bigger why didn't you just make her stop?". In fact a woman who says "I'm not actually sure if this was rape" will be told "Yeah it's rape if there's even a tiny question in your mind." In fact, in some cases the woman herself says it wasn't rape, but some third party insists it was.
Are you referring to neopenises? They take skin from the forearm and fashion it into a phallus. And it looks fucking repulsive. I've never heard of synthetic testosterone causing their vaginas to enlarge/shrink as a result of the hormones.
Testosterone doesn't cause the vagina to "shrink", but it does make the vaginal mucus membrane thinner and more "brittle", which in turn makes the FtM more vulnerable to STDs (assuming they continue to engage in PiV sex with men, which today's "gay transmen" do.)
I read an article a while back about a recent upsurge of HIV+ trans-identified females in San Fransisco. Literally no one saw that coming, because it's a never-before seen phenomenon. Trans men were understandably spared from the worst of the 80's and 90's AIDS epidemic because trans men back the were always dating and having sex with women only.
Nope. What you're looking at is reporting bias. When you ask the right questions that get around personal definitions and excuses for rape you find that
The difference is, 0.005% of those males forced to have sex will report it as a rape. 500% of the women forced to have sex will report it as rape (OK maybe that's off a bit but I'm trying to account for false accusations).
So the police see the vast vast majority of rape complaints are made against men. That proves men report being raped less than women, and nothing else. When you add more data, the picture gets clearer.
But a woman who says she was raped doesn't get told "No, if you were able to have sex it wasn't rape" or "LOL you're bigger why didn't you just make her stop?". In fact a woman who says "I'm not actually sure if this was rape" will be told "Yeah it's rape if there's even a tiny question in your mind." In fact, in some cases the woman herself says it wasn't rape, but some third party insists it was.
None of this disproves what I said, and you included statistics from the wiki page from Spain. Yes rape is underreported, so those numbers are probably slightly different. None of that changes the fact that of reported rapes, there is a male offender 98% of the time. I am citing statistics from a study done in the United States: 1
500% of the women forced to have sex will report it as rape (OK maybe that's off a bit but I'm trying to account for false accusations).
Men are far more likely to be raped by another man than they are to be either: 1. raped by a woman, or 2. falsely accused of rape by either gender. And where did you get 500% from? Rape/sexual assault is one of the most underreported crimes and victims of either sex are heavily scrutinized, and most rape victims are young women. Nearly everything you said was anecdotal, and women report more often than men do because most of the time, rape/sexual assaults are committed by men against women. So there is a larger pool of victims who will either be more or less inclined to report or not report.
From this study of crime statistics, 7.72% of men were victims of completed rape perpetrated by man, and 13.63% of men were victims of sexual assault by a man. Contrast these with the stats of woman perp-->woman victim rape & sexual assault with both 1. woman perp-->man victim rape & sexual assault, and 2. man perp-->woman victim rape & sexual assault.
In Table 1, we present a frequency distribution for rapes and other sexual assaults. The results suggest that 7.72 % of males target other males. Note that that estimate is very close to Felson and Krohn’s (1990) estimate of the percent male victims based on victimization data (7.3 %). The percentage of males who targeted other males was even higher for other types of sexual assault (13.63 %). Since the estimate of the percentage of males who are exclusively homosexual is lower (2.6 %), the pattern supports Hypothesis 1. Rates of homosexual assault were at least as high as rates of heterosexual assault.
So basically, men made up 21.35% of victims of rape and sexual assault out of 300,000 cases reported, and 95% of those cases were perpetrated by a man. Again, this does not mean women don't rape. But with actual numbers from crime stats that are essentially 97:3 percentage-wise, saying "women are just as likely to coerce or rape someone into having sex with them because of underreporting" doesn't hold water.
This is is a study done on false rape allegations in the united states: 2
False and baseless allegations of rape constitute about 5% of all rape allegations; it is at least five times the proportion of some other crimes. For instance, unfounded theft, assault, and fraud allegations constitute approximately 1% of all allegations of theft, assault or fraud. The only other crime type with comparable rates of false and baseless allegations was robbery (Table 2) [20].
Our 5% figure is also consistent with findings of other researchers in the field of allegations of rape. Ferguson and Malouff [21] found a rate of 5% confirmed false allegations in their meta-analysis on seven studies on the prevalence of false allegations.
So basically, 1% of all allegations of any crime are false, and 5% of cases of sexual assault are false, as are allegations of robbery. The numbers from the first study are gathered from 300,000 sexual assaults from the National Incident-Based Reporting System, going as far back as 1970 and as recent as 2012. The second study is based on statistics from 2006-2010 from the FBI.
Are you referring to neopenises? They take skin from the forearm and fashion it into a phallus. And it looks fucking repulsive. I've never heard of synthetic testosterone causing their vaginas to enlarge/shrink as a result of the hormones.
Testosterone doesn't cause the vagina to "shrink", but it does make the vaginal mucus membrane thinner and more "brittle", which in turn makes the FtM more vulnerable to STDs (assuming they continue to engage in PiV sex with men, which today's "gay transmen" do.)
I read an article a while back about a recent upsurge of HIV+ trans-identified females in San Fransisco. Literally no one saw that coming, because it's a never-before seen phenomenon. Trans men were understandably spared from the worst of the 80's and 90's AIDS epidemic because trans men back the were always dating and having sex with women only.
Adding to this that it can actually get worse than just that. Buck Angel the FTM pornstar actually had an issue where their uterus and cervix atrophied so badly they almost died as a result of an infection. [X]
Until I got an infection in my uterus! What happened was that the use of the testosterone over 15 years started to make my cervix and uterus atrophy. The cervix basically closed and so anything inside my uterus could not get out. Who knows how long this was going on for, but one day I just got so sick that I had to be rushed to the emergency room. They had no idea what was wrong and did exploratory laparascopic surgery. They did an emergency appendectomy and they saw the infection in my fallopian tube and uterus and found that my cervix fused closed. I was really, really sick and spent 4 nights in the hospital. I needed tons of antibiotics to get over the infection.
Quick edit: To add onto this the quote in the post just kills me.
So here I am now going into surgery because of the fact that the doctors basically had no idea what long term use of testosterone does to the reproductive system!
None of this disproves what I said, and you included statistics from the wiki page from Spain. Yes rape is underreported, so those numbers are probably slightly different. None of that changes the fact that of reported rapes, there is a male offender 98% of the time. I am citing statistics from a study done in the United States: 1
Men are far more likely to be raped by another man than they are to be either: 1. raped by a woman, or 2. falsely accused of rape by either gender. And where did you get 500% from? Rape/sexual assault is one of the most underreported crimes and victims of either sex are heavily scrutinized, and most rape victims are young women. Nearly everything you said was anecdotal, and women report more often than men do because most of the time, rape/sexual assaults are committed by men against women. So there is a larger pool of victims who will either be more or less inclined to report or not report.
From this study of crime statistics, 7.72% of men were victims of completed rape perpetrated by man, and 13.63% of men were victims of sexual assault by a man. Contrast these with the stats of woman perp-->woman victim rape & sexual assault with both 1. woman perp-->man victim rape & sexual assault, and 2. man perp-->woman victim rape & sexual assault.
So basically, men made up 21.35% of victims of rape and sexual assault out of 300,000 cases reported, and 95% of those cases were perpetrated by a man. Again, this does not mean women don't rape. But with actual numbers from crime stats that are essentially 97:3 percentage-wise, saying "women are just as likely to coerce or rape someone into having sex with them because of underreporting" doesn't hold water.
This is is a study done on false rape allegations in the united states: 2
So basically, 1% of all allegations of any crime are false, and 5% of cases of sexual assault are false, as are allegations of robbery. The numbers from the first study are gathered from 300,000 sexual assaults from the National Incident-Based Reporting System, going as far back as 1970 and as recent as 2012. The second study is based on statistics from 2006-2010 from the FBI.
Then why did a survey of high schoolers end up with 2.4 percent of men and 1.8 percent of women saying they "forced someone to have sex"
You keep going back to the reported crime figure but we know men report rape at a much lower frequency.
When asking perpetrators you get different numbers. We're the girls who said they forced someone to have sex lying.
Like I said the 500 percent was pulled from my ass. I was just trying to bring false rape accusations into the conversation. Obviously I don't have the data (nor does anyone) about how many rape claims are false. But naively comparing it to other false crime reports ignores the special status rape accusations have. You have ruined the reputation already by making the accusation. You don't have to actually take it to court.
I don't know? And nobody else does either. But self-reporting is dubious. Crime stats are not dubious and they leave little room for individual interpretation. If reported statistics show a trend as skewed as the one I just took the time to lay out for you, then that same relationship can be generalized to account for underreporting, which often makes the trend look even more severe rather than less severe/more balanced (which is what your trying to argue).
Just because you never heard of this doesn't mean it's not true. It's a well known fact that testosterone overdoses affect female sex organs in a negative way.
I never said it wasn't true, just that I hadn't heard of it lol. And two other users already took the time to educate me on this disgusting phenomenon and it is now burned into my brain.
Just because you never heard of this doesn't mean it's not true. It's a well known fact that testosterone overdoses affect female sex organs in a negative way.
I don't know? And nobody else does either. But self-reporting is dubious. Crime stats are not dubious and they leave little room for individual interpretation. If reported statistics show a trend as skewed as the one I just took the time to lay out for you, then that same relationship can be generalized to account for underreporting, which often makes the trend look even more severe rather than less severe/more balanced (which is what your trying to argue).
Point to where I said it wasn't true. And two other users already took the time to educate me on this disgusting phenomenon and it is now burned into my brain.
Hmm, well I disagree but at this point we're just insisting one data set is better than another and I am not equipped or interested in digging into the matter further.
Eh thanks for arguing about it in good faith, rape is a touchy subject so levelheaded discussions are hard to come by.
Why else would they get so angry at cross dressers and call any dude who's even the slightest bit effeminate an "egg" (someone who hasn't trooned out yet)?
I would say because it reminds them of the inescapable truth that they are men in dresses and wearing horrible makeup. But i'll take the shit and say that they are jealous because at least cross dressers put effort in appearing feminine instead of being walking abominations
lol i’d argue that trans guys can be born male. “assigned male”, not so much, but we can be born male just the same as cis guys imo. regardless, though, i’m sorry, that’s really shitty of them, there’s no good reason to exclude trans men
From what I learned being trans is neurological, your brain develops into the opposite gender. Hence why it's kinda weird and slightly difficult to explain completely. But that being said your brain is male hence you're male hence you can join
