Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Why are you here?
We have a rule to not engage with people who are discussed here.
She wouldn't be harassed by us.

I will add @emspex to the autism.
She might have work to do.
I'm here because i was reading the thread as I support vic then saw a conversation about someone i know, and thought whynot explain her circumstance so y'all can be better thn the kickviccrowd
 
She was brutally raped at a con she was staffing 5 years ago, the guy got 12 years, she's a lesbian, she didnt lead him on, he locked her in a screening room she was managing and he had a knife, I support vic but cant blame her tbh

This is the last place in the fucking world anyone gives a shit about your worthless plights. Nobody cares and they aren't a free pass to be an utterly horrible person forever afterwards.
 
829999


haven't you realised that moron hasn't submitted anything to defend themselves?


https://mobile.twitter.com/AshleyUncia/status/1147559074772508672
 
I wasnt staff so cant confirm or deny but probably
Okay, so you turn up out of the blue to white knight your stubborn and badly informed friend, drop a really flimsy story about Sabat and generally talk in half completed sentences.

What exactly did you hope to achieve by doing this? Hoping we'd be crass about your friend's rape so you could run off to twitter for some victim points and show how evil ISWV is? Shitting on people who've been raped is something the people your friend sides with would do.
 
Whether you're a contractor or employee is generally a complex, multi factor analysis, and has to do with in what context the issue is being contested, because slithery people claim slithery self-serving things and just whether or not you have a contract or not is not determinative.

On the good side it's the kind of complex, factual issue that requires a trier of fact, that is, a judge or jury, to decide after an actual trial rather than just be disposed of via summary judgment.
 
I'm here because i was reading the thread as I support vic then saw a conversation about someone i know, and thought whynot explain her circumstance so y'all can be better thn the kickviccrowd
It doesn't take much to be better than the Kick Vic crowd, we don't need your help. The Kick Vic crowd includes SHANE. If you need more explaining then that, then get the f out.
 
I'm here because i was reading the thread as I support vic then saw a conversation about someone i know, and thought whynot explain her circumstance so y'all can be better thn the kickviccrowd
And you're wasting our time with this derailing shit.

Permathreadbanned. Carry on. :julay:
 
Okay, so you turn up out of the blue to white knight your stubborn and badly informed friend, drop a really flimsy story about Sabat and generally talk in half completed sentences.

What exactly did you hope to achieve by doing this? Hoping we'd be crass about your friend's rape so you could run off to twitter for some victim points and show how evil ISWV is? Shitting on people who've been raped is something the people your friend sides with would do.
Lol probably got offered nudes to come on here and look like a moron for sympathy points.
And you're wasting our time with this derailing shit.

Permathreadbanned. Carry on. :julay:
Based. :drink:
 
He should not be allowed to work with people anymore.
View attachment 829980
See, this one? This one really grinds my gears. Because it shows acknowledgement that the goal is to ruin people while simultaneously opting out of the hard part of justice: pursuing it.

That's what this "schrodinger" state is, you're simultaneously guilty and innocent and nobody knows so they err on the side of caution and treat you like radioactive waste.

Without the "accusers" having to prove shit. They don't even have to face the accused. Oh because that would be harassing or against women or some cockamamie bullshit.

Fuck off.

They want a world where you can opt-out of the hard part while reaping the totally non-personally beneficial rewards of being "stunning" and "brave" for standing up and spewing some bullshit to literally ruin someone for life.

Someone who wants this world and takes action to bring it about is called a coward at best, and are no better than the secret police or the stukachs that reported to them in the old USSR.

So no, zero sympathy. None at all.

Also let's not forget the cherry on top: choice of language. "Predator" is 100% intended to invoke imagery of child rapists especially in this context, even though the word doesn't explicitly say that. It's like "assault weapon". You can get people lie FOR you simply by relaying the similar sounding word or phrase to them without you being personally culpable of saying the word you WANT to say.

Just as a fun reminder: Funi won't even admit they fired him FOR anything, and that their tweets were not intended to imply or state he had harassed anyone, sexually or otherwise. So it's kinda hard to argue there's an authoritative source for the predator claim.

In closing, someone else said it earlier: whatever her experiences may have been, they don't obviate current exceptionalism. And boy oh boy is that exceptionalism strong.
 
sorry keep debating whether to finish that story, 2014 nomcon ireland, myself and several staff members witness and interfere with chris sabat trying to lure a minor (16) into hotel room, she may have been impaired, cant swear to it but she may have been drunk. again this is an anecdote and i cant justify beyond my word, and itd be doublestandards to be on vics side against anecdotes but expect you guys to accept my word on sabat
Is that even Illegal in ireland?
 
Is that even Illegal in ireland?


If she's drunk then she would be committing an offence as she is underage,anyone buying her drinks would also be responsible for breaking the law. She can legally consent at 16 but if she wanted to make her own complaint that she was taken advantage of or forced to do something while unable to consent due to being inebriated. If she wasn't too drunk to consent then nothing about it is illegal and they were just cock blocking.

Edit: I am probably completely wrong unless this was in Northern Ireland.
 

Here, let me make it easier for you guys. This is the farms. We don't give a shit about your trivial past or if you're looking for sympathy in life. If we get paid in the lolz, we're gonna milk the cows.

Fuck this delusional dangerhair.

There.
 
Back