T. Greg Doucette / Thomas Gregory Doucette / greg_doucette / TGDLaw / fsckemall / lawdevnull / TDot - Super Lawyer, Failed Politician, Captain of The Threadnought, Drowning in Debt

feral cat #6385 said:
Wish this guy would hurry up and AN HERO. Or his CPAP catches on fire and he burns to death in his sleep. I think I prefer that better. Can CPAP's do that?
Click to expand...
We have top agents working on it
 

Attachments

  • hackers-cast-thumb-560x2861.jpg
    hackers-cast-thumb-560x2861.jpg
    40.9 KB · Views: 168
  • maxresdefault.jpg
    maxresdefault.jpg
    99.3 KB · Views: 107
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Coleman Francis, Pope of Degeneracy, Questioning_Huggers and 1 other person
Son of Sparda 84 said:
View attachment 830205
View attachment 830206
Click to expand...

The attorney fees have to be "reasonable" thou, I can't help but notice that they don't mention that. You can't just run up the bill with a bunch of unnecessary BS they way Casey has been. So if by some miracle all the defendants win their TCPA (LOL, NO) I highly doubt a judge would think MoRon having three law firms employed would be considered to be reasonable attorneys fees. Which they are doing BECAUSE VIC IS TOTALLY GOING TO PAYING FOR EVERYTHING!
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: The Littlest Shitlord, Questioning_Huggers, Allanon and 3 others
Clockwork Dragon said:
What I am curious about is why Marc Randazza stopped posting there.
Click to expand...

Randazza is an actual lawyer who does actual law. Maybe he just no longer had time for dealing with autists being autistic about autism.

Facts Over Feels said:
The attorney fees have to be "reasonable" thou, I can't help but notice that they don't mention that. You can't just run up the bill with a bunch of unnecessary BS they way Casey has been. So if by some miracle all the defendants win their TCPA (LOL, NO) I highly doubt a judge would think MoRon having three law firms employed would be considered to be reasonable attorneys fees. Which they are doing BECAUSE VIC IS TOTALLY GOING TO PAYING FOR EVERYTHING!
Click to expand...

This is one reason when you see "bill-padding" activities in a lolsuit, you see utterly nonsensical activities like we've seen in this case. They hope to win the TCPA and then claim zillions and zillions of billable hours and they already know much of the bullshit they're doing is completely worthless, padded, nonsensical bullshit. So they hope they bill for all these bullshit activities and maybe get half of it.

It's unethical, it's shitty, and yes, it's the kind of shit that shit-tier lawyers get away with routinely. If you have any respect for yourself, your profession, or humanity, you don't do this, but look at these fucking people. They're garbage.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Evil Bunny, Exterminatus, Pixis and 9 others
repentance said:
He's definitely a narcissist.
Click to expand...
For legal reasons it is my opinion that he is a narcissist, and probably a sociopath. He's very very self important.
But jesus christ the flakes of law twitter that orbit this guy, I know absolutely fuck all about law but somehow these people passed the bar with hot takes like "state law does not apply to the state".
 
  • Agree
Reactions: theworstkindofeurofag
I'm quite sure that you can have tortious interference without defamation (hence the name tortious interference with a contract), but then again what would I know. I 'm not a super lawyer or anything. I'm pretty sure Shane had a better grasp of it when he was reading from a wiki article or getting fed lines from a Discord server on Nick's show. To quote Nick, "How embarrassing!"
 
Last edited:
Zero Day Defense said:
View attachment 831201

archive.fo

T. Greg Doucette on Twitter: "Except TI – tortious interference – can…

archived 8 Jul 2019 00:32:57 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo

This is curious...

(also, there's a "threadnaught" thing? Whatever that is...)
Click to expand...
Whether it's defamation or not doesn't matter. What does matter is that Ron used this information to break Vic's contract with, at the very least, Kamehacon. Whether the statements are true or false do not matter in Texas to determine TI with an existing contract.
 
Zero Day Defense said:
View attachment 831201

archive.fo

T. Greg Doucette on Twitter: "Except TI – tortious interference – can…

archived 8 Jul 2019 00:32:57 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo

This is curious...

(also, there's a "threadnaught" thing? Whatever that is...)
Click to expand...

He has no fucking clue what he's talking about. A threat of breaching one's own contract unless the contract of another is breached also constitutes TI. The statement is "true" and not "defamatory" but it is still actionable. He's just blowing bullshit out his ass with no idea what he's talking about, like an incompetent idiot.

Far Queue said:
I'm quite sure that you can have tortious interference without defamation (hence the name tortious interference with a contract), but then again what would I know. I 'm not a super lawyer or anything. I'm pretty sure Shane had a better grasp of it when he was reading from a wiki article or getting fed lines from a Discord server on Nick's show. To quote Nick, "How embarrassing!"
Click to expand...

This stupid, fat, lazy idiot could have saved himself some embarrassment by taking ten measly seconds to actually look up the definition of the cause of action, but he'd rather just make a total fool of himself talking absolute nonsense.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Evil Bunny, ConSluttant, Doctor D and 8 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back