Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification

Are we sure that Miriam Yaniv account is actually Johnny’s gross psychotic mom?

The account follows no one, not even Johnny dearest, and seems to only tweet about Zionist Israeli stuff. Given Miriam’s behavior and location I have a hard time imagining she just tweets in support of Zionist topics all day in Hewbrew. Account makes me think it’s another Miriam who lives in Israel.

There is a Miriam Yaniv in Tel Aviv who has an Instagram account under that name. I believe that twitter account is hers and not the Langley Miriam.
 
How do these tribunals deal with double jeopardy? If Yaniv is being particularly spiteful can he demand they wax his balls and then take them to the HRT for a second time when they refuse?
Cancuckistan has no Bill of Rights, remember? It's just like the UK that way. They don't have the same guaranteed rights to freedom of speech, speedy trial, any of that good stuff we get down here in Burgerland.
 
Are we sure that Miriam Yaniv account is actually Johnny’s gross psychotic mom?

The account follows no one, not even Johnny dearest, and seems to only tweet about Zionist Israeli stuff. Given Miriam’s behavior and location I have a hard time imagining she just tweets in support of Zionist topics all day in Hewbrew. Account makes me think it’s another Miriam who lives in Israel.

Can we talk mikva'ot and Miriam's shouts of "our values", @MirnaMinkoff ? I come at this a drooling goy fool, yet my current goal in life is to get Yaniv to demand that BC's mikva'ot (all two of them) let him purify his girlie body to ensure "our values" are indeed troon-approved.

I have some inexpert concepts holding me back. Even though Yaniv likes to wear pads and dangle tampons in front of 10-year-old girls, he is not married, so he doesn't need to go to a mikveh after menstruating so that he can give his hubby some marital duties. But surely Yaniv should throw himself bodily (with a splash) in front of persecuted married troons who would be insufferably wounded if not allowed to immerse. Ummm, yes?

And some congregations (probably not Chabad) have decided troons can immerse, so what's the deal in BC?

Since your Palermo posts show you have smarts on this subject, WTF should Yaniv do to make sure Our Values are upheld?

Thank you.
____________________
P.S. This is not a trolling plan. It is an Our Values Plan to ensure the most oppressed people in the world are not oppressed by the previously most oppressed people in the world. I think the Sikhs are going to like this one, by the way, and we owe them one.
 
Can we talk mikva'ot and Miriam's shouts of "our values", @MirnaMinkoff ? I come at this a drooling goy fool, yet my current goal in life is to get Yaniv to demand that BC's mikva'ot (all two of them) let him purify his girlie body to ensure "our values" are indeed troon-approved.

I have some inexpert concepts holding me back. Even though Yaniv likes to wear pads and dangle tampons in front of 10-year-old girls, he is not married, so he doesn't need to go to a mikveh after menstruating so that he can give his hubby some marital duties. But surely Yaniv should throw himself bodily (with a splash) in front of persecuted married troons who would be insufferably wounded if not allowed to immerse. Ummm, yes?

And some congregations (probably not Chabad) have decided troons can immerse, so what's the deal in BC?

Since your Palermo posts show you have smarts on this subject, WTF should Yaniv do to make sure Our Values are upheld?

Thank you.
____________________
P.S. This is not a trolling plan. It is an Our Values Plan to ensure the most oppressed people in the world are not oppressed by the previously most oppressed people in the world. I think the Sikhs are going to like this one, by the way, and we owe them one.
Men can immerse in any mikvah, there are just separate hours for them. Source: lived in Jewish neighborhood with an eruv and whatever and read their newspapers when bored.
 
For everyone that wants the kangaroo court shutdown or dreaming of it, it's not going to happen. It's not because the average Canadian is going to see a case like JY's and agrees with him. The tribunal mainly deals with employee/employer relations. The average person sees shit like JY abusing the system and hates it but they also want strong worker protections. I'd argue it already deals with a credibility problem,at least with the people I talk to, but people want to keep their jobs.
 
Men can immerse in any mikvah, there are just separate hours for them. Source: lived in Jewish neighborhood with an eruv and whatever and read their newspapers when bored.

Will Jessica Yaniv, a girl, be eligible or comfortable using those hours?

Edit: In case you need proof Yaniv is a girl, here it is, 100% all that the law requires:
Screen Shot 2019-07-13 at 7.47.36 PM.png
 
I'm aware. What I'm asking is, if it's for "all bodies" and anyone "12+", doesn't that mean the tranny teens' parents and any sane straight people can come to kick the shit out of Jonny?

I'm pretty sure any revival of this event will still have the "no parent" thing as part of it. A number of so-called trans activists think minors at any age should be allowed to transition -- up to and including hormone therapy and reassignment surgery -- without parental consent or intervention. As an aside, look at Jazz Jennings for a real-life example of why this is a bad idea. Additionally, I'm sure the event would be billed as a "safe space" to further appeal to the minors struggling with their sexual identity as a way to cover up the fact the event is supported by creepy folks with less than noble motives/intentions.

So, I'm pretty sure the 12+ swim event JY envisions would keep the same "no parents" language we saw on the original flyer along with "all bodies" which might be on there solely as an SJW-esque buzz phrase to discourage ableism and discrimination.

It would probably be too :optimistic: to hope some parents insisted on taking part in such an event so they could be turned away and subsequently file a BCHRT complaint against JY and any other organizers for violating their human rights as parents to accompany/supervise their minor children at a public event supposedly open to all in the age range into which they fall. Still, the thought of JY being a respondent in a tribunal case would make for an interesting turnabout.
[E: Corrected wrong word]
 
Last edited:
Will Jessica Yaniv, a girl, be eligible or comfortable using those hours?

Edit: In case you need proof Yaniv is a girl, here it is, 100% all that the law requires:
View attachment 840193
Probably not, but as you said, he's not married so he doesn't really need to anyhow. Not to mention, 95% of Jews ignore 95% of Judaism to start with these days, outside the hat and coat communities like in NYC. He doesn't seem particularly observant so even if he were married (lol) would it ever occur to him to try this?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: PeckingOrder
Cancuckistan has no Bill of Rights, remember? It's just like the UK that way. They don't have the same guaranteed rights to freedom of speech, speedy trial, any of that good stuff we get down here in Burgerland.

I'm not sure why so many people in this thread keep spouting off about legal stuff that they have no clue about.

As has been discussed multiple times in this exact thread, Canada does have a written Charter of Rights and Freedoms, unlike the UK. However, unlike the US, it has a limitations clause that permits rights to be violated in certain circumstances. Yes, this is a problem, but no, before you claim otherwise, it doesn't make your post correct.
 
Probably not, but as you said, he's not married so he doesn't really need to anyhow. Not to mention, 95% of Jews ignore 95% of Judaism to start with these days, outside the hat and coat communities like in NYC. He doesn't seem particularly observant so even if he were married (lol) would it ever occur to him to try this?

Yes, he may need some encouragement to pursue this human rights issue. But since failure to purse this human rights issue might raise some eyebrows about biases lurking in the shadows of his values thinking, I'm sure he will do this despite nearly dying every few minutes from brain tumors and assassin crosswalk intrusions.

Edit to avoid double posting:
I'm not sure why so many people in this thread keep spouting off about legal stuff that they have no clue about.

Null, we need a rating for "Oh hai, have you never been here before?"
 
The US does not grant absolute freedoms to anyone for anything. Every right granted to citizens is subject to restrictions except for maybe the third amendment. And that's just because I cannot find a single bit of jurisprudence about the third amendment
 
The US does not grant absolute freedoms to anyone for anything. Every right granted to citizens is subject to restrictions except for maybe the third amendment. And that's just because I cannot find a single bit of jurisprudence about the third amendment

A (Canadian) constitutional law prof gave me the best argument in favour of the limitations clause that I've heard (knowing that I opposed it): she said that the limitations clause allowed Canadian courts to interpret rights broadly and generously in the first place, since the limitation clause then served to narrow them in practice. Conversely, without a limitations clause, the categories of rights themselves would have to be interpreted more narrowly initially.

It didn't quite change my view of what the end result should be, but it did clue me in to the fact that it's arguably just a different path to comparable outcomes.

With that said, the US definitely does, in practice, have stronger protections for expression, for example, than Canada.
 
How do these tribunals deal with double jeopardy? If Yaniv is being particularly spiteful can he demand they wax his balls and then take them to the HRT for a second time when they refuse?

That's criminal law. In a real court, there's also something called res judicata which prohibits relitigating the same issue, but I doubt this clownshoes bullshit star chamber has any such thing.
 
That's criminal law. In a real court, there's also something called res judicata which prohibits relitigating the same issue, but I doubt this clownshoes bullshit star chamber has any such thing.

Well, not only that, but even in criminal law, although Canada does have protections against double jeopardy under Section 11(h) of the Charter, it only applies to "final" acquittals, and the Crown can actually appeal acquittals in criminal cases, unlike in the US.
 
The US does not grant absolute freedoms to anyone for anything. Every right granted to citizens is subject to restrictions except for maybe the third amendment. And that's just because I cannot find a single bit of jurisprudence about the third amendment
Rights aren't granted by the government, and the 2nd Amendment says "shall not be infringed".
 
. I'm sure even JBP, or one of his worshipers, is keeping tabs on this. All of these people are also familiar with the disturbing pedo side of Johnny Boy.
lindsay JY.jpg yep, lindsay shepherd is still talking about it. JBP is the only canadian I know of who has called for the HRT to be dissolved.
 
Are we sure that Miriam Yaniv account is actually Johnny’s gross psychotic mom?

The account follows no one, not even Johnny dearest, and seems to only tweet about Zionist Israeli stuff. Given Miriam’s behavior and location I have a hard time imagining she just tweets in support of Zionist topics all day in Hewbrew. Account makes me think it’s another Miriam who lives in Israel.

Johnny’s mommy is to fucking nasty and unhinged to focus on just Zionism. She’s as narcissistic as Jonathan. I’d bet any SM account Miriam ran would as narcissistic and crazy as her sons. They are both textbook cases of extreme personality disorders, which is why no one else can stand either of these disgusting twats. Mummy is Johnny’s only friend.
That kind of jives with an old person who doesn't really get social media. I think it's her.
 
Back