Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

How are they gonna spin this? Will they use this to call Trump a warmonger?


Philippine president calls on Trump to park US Navy outside China
by Russ Read
| July 17, 2019 04:16 PM




President Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines wants President Trump to park the Navy's 7th Fleet on China's doorstep in response to ongoing tensions in the Pacific.

Citing a decades-old security agreement, Duterte called on Trump to gather the fleet in response to a June incident involving a Chinese vessel ramming a Filipino fishing boat inside Philippine waters.
"I'm calling now America. I am invoking the RP-US Pact, and I would like America to gather their Seventh Fleet in front of China. I'm asking them now," Duterte said during an interview with Apollo Quibiloy, a Filipino religious leader who claims to be the "appointed son of God."


Known for making bombastic statements, Duterte said he would personally go on board with the fleet and invite his local critics to join him.
"I will join them, I will ride on the boat with admiral of the U.S.," Duterte said.
The Philippines has reason to be concerned about its security in the face of a growing Chinese threat. The June incident left nearly two dozen fishermen adrift, prompting the Filipino government to demand answers from China. Duterte would later dismiss the ramming as "a little maritime incident."

The Philippines is 1 of 5 countries in dispute with China over the South China Sea, a key trade route and resource-rich region. China has engaged in an island-building campaign in the region for years, building naval depots, air strips, and weapons platforms on the artificial islands. In response, the U.S. Navy, including the 7th Fleet, has engaged in what it calls "freedom of navigation" operations in the area in an effort to keep sea lanes open. These operations have led to several close encounters with Chinese forces.
The Mutual Defense Treaty cited by Duterte was signed by the United States and the Philippines in 1951. The treaty provides for mutual defense in certain situations, with some important caveats. First, it states that a response must be proportional in accordance with the country's constitution, said Seth Cropsey, a former deputy undersecretary of the Navy and director of the Hudson Institute's Center for American Seapower.
"And also, there's a clause in there that says — I'm sure this leaves any possible enemies of their country huddling in terror in a corner — that an actual attack ... will be referred to the United Nations," Cropsey said. "So basically, the truth of this is that if hostilities break out against either of the signatories that both of them must abide by their constitutions and the matter will go to the UN for adjudication."
In March, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo promised the U.S. would continue to guarantee the treaty and protect the Philippines should the country be attacked. It reaffirmed its commitment to the Philippines security during bilateral talks that ended on Tuesday, reiterating Pompeo's promise that "any attack on Philippine armed forces, public vessels, or aircraft in the [South China Sea]" would trigger the treaty.
Following the treaty's guidelines, Cropsey said asking an entire fleet to sit outside the Chinese mainland is unlikely, though he added Duterte may have a point in trying to get China to stop.
Playing in Duterte's favor is his seemingly close relationship with Trump. The two have developed something of a bond since winning their presidential elections in 2016. Duterte even serenaded Trump during a gala dinner in 2017, calling the president "the light in my world, a half of this heart of mine."

Cropsey said there could be room for a smaller security arrangement, such as military exchanges and participation in military exercises. While the U.S. has avoided taking sides on territorial disputes, it has pursued stronger partnerships with other Asian countries in the South China Sea region.
 
They keep hammering that button, and all it's going to do is eventually people will get tired and say "Yeah, fine, I'm a racist, I don't care, fuck you."

They've been steadily eroding the impact of the word for decades now, and within a couple of years they're going to go from it being one of the most fearful words to nobody giving a fuck just because of the sheer number of things blue checkmarks will declare you racist over.

I guess when everybody's racist, nobody will be.
 
Except there will be no case of some madman climbing from near the bottom by taking out the person just ahead of him - climbing the ladder while also not being seen as threat by the front runners until it was too late and he had momentum.



Simple you libfag.
They will call Trump racist all day, but when he calls them anti-semetic, they have to scramble to explain how they aren't the real nazis.



Still calling the DNC fix for Biden. I think we'll see Biden-Warren (Warren is a toss up, again she's got a good thing going in the Senate and might not want to trade that for 4-8 years of Veep) or maybe Biden-Buttgieg. Maybe Biden-Harris, but I don't see her walking from her career to accept second place.

Yes the classic tactic of saying no you're the racist!

 
Yes the classic tactic of saying no you're the racist!

It's old and "unwitty", but it's still true, at least in this context.

The USA and Israel are still allies.

I may not agree with the US giving Israel all that foreign aid, but the two are still allies, and close ones at that.
 
Last edited:
Are there really people who honestly thought that when Trump won he was going to cut all ties with Israel? like are there people that exceptional?
Most people were expecting trump to stop giving them gibs and tell them to stop acting like a bunch of retards and get their shit together
 
Are there really people who honestly thought that when Trump won he was going to cut all ties with Israel? like are there people that exceptional?
Well the Alt-Right is just as autstic and cringy as Antifa. In the case of Antifa, they think that the root of all evil is capitalism and Christianity and so they unironcally think that communism will solve the world's problems. Now in the case of the Alt-Right, they petty much think that Jews and Israel are the main reasons why some animal species are going extinct and with many of them actually thinking that things like how the Earth being round that is taught in really just about any credible school is somehow part of a Jewish conspiracy and whatnot.

They're both part of the same autistic coin as I see it.
 
Last edited:
They keep hammering that button, and all it's going to do is eventually people will get tired and say "Yeah, fine, I'm a racist, I don't care, fuck you."

They've been steadily eroding the impact of the word for decades now, and within a couple of years they're going to go from it being one of the most fearful words to nobody giving a fuck just because of the sheer number of things blue checkmarks will declare you racist over.

I guess when everybody's racist, nobody will be.
No, no! We must double down! TRIPLE DOWN!
847194


847195


847196


847197


847198


847199


847200
 
Oh gee, I wonder if any supporters of Omar's ever chanted anything at an event? Apparently things your supporters say are your words now, I'm sure her home state somalis never said anything unfortunate about jews though...

Remember, according to Omar: civil liberties only matter if you're Muslim, and only because "some people did something".
 
Back