Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Something is coming. Publicly sharing the news reports brazenly on their page. I suspect another hospital live, or mama Yaniv “takes over the page” and shares shattering news about JYs health while they’re unconscious or some shit.
Is this on his FB? Have any of his FB friends commented on the less savoury details that have come out?
 
I can look around tomorrow, but the publication ban will likely make that difficult. I’m also not a BC resident, so unfortunately I can’t do any legwork.

Since you seem to know your stuff:

1) Is the lifting of the publication ban not retroactive (as it had been an interim measure now deemed unsupported)?

2) There would be no published decisions of complaints that were resolved by way of mediation and didn't go to a hearing, so how would one go about obtaining info about such cases?

I guess I'm not understanding how the publication ban would factor here.
 
Its amazing how every time someone in his Twitter brings up his predatory behavior towards children, he immediately shifts the focus onto how he's a woman and not a man because the person who brought it up used a male pronoun instead of a female one. Its like those people who can't actually make a comeback to an argument so they just correct their grammar instead and say "GOTCHA!"
I kind of wish people wouldn’t keep doing the YOU’RE A MAN! thing on Twitter. It’s true, he’s a man, but misgendering is one of those things he can use to get people banned and that handwringing troons like Oger can use to divert the discourse.

He’s a pedophile, a racist, a bully, a mamma’s boy, a career failure, a disability faker, a misogynist, a peeping tom and his ideas about biology are facepalm-worthy. There’s plenty to work with without risking the wrath of the Facebook troon squad.
Is Miriam calling the cops simply because she wants someone else to talk to besides Johnny?
Might be because he literally threatened to kill his neighbor over Twitter.
 
Did no one else see that Rose of Dawn, a male-to -female trans who is gender critical, joined and posted here? And livestreamed her anti yanivery point of view? Can't say none of them.....also, consider the detransitioners populating 4th wave now etc. There ARE a growing number of the T who say fuck this nonsense!

Currently listening to 'The Rose Pill - Ep. 5 | Waxing Lyrical About Yaniv' (linked earlier in the thread ) where goinglikeelsie's tweets are being discussed, tweet by tweet. I'm finding it a lot easier to follow than this fast-paced thread where it's difficult at times to keep up with the perv's shenanigans and I've learned a few things from the stream that I've probably missed here.

Doesn't have any time for JY, quite rightly too. Well worth a listen, imho.
 
JY withdrew complaints on 3 of the respondents. How many have gone to the tribunal that we know of (and upcoming?)

In total there was 16... let’s math together.
I'm curious about the long-term damage here.
It was mentioned earlier in the thread that he's been at this since at least 2013. How many women has he pressured into settlements and trials since then?

Edit: Twitter data shows that people sure are talking about Jessica Yaniv.
JYtweetgraph.png
 
Last edited:
I finally caught up with everything and it has been a fucking roller coaster. It made me mad at the internet but also cleaned my sinuses, thanks to all the people who followed this thing and posted transcriptions, audios, videos and other documents. It's a pity that all this entertainment comes at the expenses of unfortunate women who just try to earn money. I hope that now that the ban has been lifted, more victims bringing more proofs will add their voices to squash this nutcase.

And seriously, M.Y. declaring under oath that her son menstruates is uncanny valley shit, how is it possible that this kind of statement is considered acceptable?
 
I'm curious about the long-term damage here.
It was mentioned earlier in the thread that he's been at this since at least 2013. How many women has he pressured into settlements and trials since then?
Lots of protections exist for what are sometimes referred to as “vulnerable people” here in Canada. Also, Jonathan owns the condo—it’s not a landlord tenant situation. I can’t say how it would shake out, but it could get messy quickly and Strata would need to weigh its options before pursuing a civil suit.

Private fines for breaches of contract from a property management company aren’t themselves civil suits. They can escalate if the fine goes unpaid (and the circumstances are such that the fine is actionable, i.e. there was an agreement in place, party A broke some part of that agreement, party B has attempted to levy a fine as per the same agreement but has been unsuccessful, and, after whatever period of time/payment schedule outlined in the agreement elapses, later sues for damages in small claims court or another venue) but from what I’ve seen it’s not something that generally goes straight from fine to court.

Also, it is made complicated by the fact that certain protections do exist for individuals with disabilities, unsophisticated individuals, etc., whether they are tenants or parties to a contract. While I wouldn’t necessarily guess that vitiating factors would come into play here, who knows. Here, Strata is the sophisticated, powerful party (has access to lawyers, is able to draft the terms, etc.) while Jonathan is not (likely can’t afford a lawyer, has no bargaining power, etc.). On top of that, while Jonathan’s physical disabilities seem, well, nonexistent, he might have a mental disability (given his comment about attending a special program in school) and his mother is HoH. These things make the Yanivs even more vulnerable in comparison to Strata.

Whenever power imbalances crop up, there’s room for the court to intervene in the interests of fairness. Think courts of equity—not necessarily what the law says but what the law should do. Things could get complicated really quickly in a civil suit with either Yaniv if they wanted it to, even over something so simple as a fine.

It’s this weird settlement aspect of the tribunal that confuses me and what I’m interested in.

It was mentioned one lady waxer was turned down by 26 lawyers and told by many to “settle.” So how does that work? Do they just pay Jonathan a sum he asks for and he drops the matter? Is it a mediated settlement where some 3rd party determines the amount?

This is what makes it seem like Jonathan found a little niche to use to extort money with. I mean he filed against at minimum 16 women, he must have been scrolling SM to find and threaten every immigrant women home waxer in BC. I’m just wondering how much money he managed to pocket using the tribunal suit threats/ bully pulpit.

I think the tribunal hearings are Jonathan trying to make those bitches suffer for refusing to pay him the settlement/money he wanted.

I’m just curious about how exactly Jonathan was intending to use this quasi-legal system to extort money from or punish immigrant women. I’d like to know how many “settlements” or how much money he pocketed up until this point using threats of tribunal hearings.
 
Since you seem to know your stuff:

1) Is the lifting of the publication ban not retroactive (as it had been an interim measure now deemed unsupported)?

2) There would be no published decisions of complaints that were resolved by way of mediation and didn't go to a hearing, so how would one go about obtaining info about such cases?

I guess I'm not understanding how the publication ban would factor here.
I will look into these tomorrow and get back to you. They would likely not change the names of the cases retroactively (for reference purposes) but instead, as the Member did with the most recent decision, use Jonathan’s chosen name going forward. The publication ban was very odd, so while I believe that it being lifted is likely retroactive (considering the Member referred to Jonathan as X only in the style of cause, which wouldn’t change, but otherwise referred to past events using Jonathan’s chosen name) I can’t say much more than that.

Also, Rule 6 of the Tribunal Rules and Regulations says documents are made available to the public 3 months out from the scheduled trial date, so one potential avenue is to compare publicly available files vs previously posted schedules. That being said, the documents don’t appear to be available online but instead are likely available at the Tribunal itself. Hence, legwork.

“Friends.” Aren’t you just the cutest?

His only friend is his mother. Literally.
I went back and stuck FB in as a modifier before friends before hitting post because just “friends” felt too weird to say. I regret this now.
 
So, when all this shit blows over and Yaniv either moves elsewhere to start this crap anew, or learns to shut up (:optimistic: ), what's the betting the troon thing gets dropped like a hot brick? For now, the "I'm a lady" schtick is fashionable and has gotten Yaniv attention and money, but the tide is turning and his name is rapidly becoming mud.

How fast will he go back to being male, using his """illnesses""" and jewishness as victim points, and blaming the whole troon kiddie fiddling brown woman hating thing on his brain tumour?

People associate all this crap with Jessica/Jonathan Yaniv, dressed up like a christmas turkey and squealing about LGBTQWTFBBQ. Change his first name to something else, get a haircut and male clothes again, "who's Jessica Yaniv?" and "you can't hold something I did against me when I was desperately ill and incapable!"

He's got a habit of reinventing himself and finding new markets for his perversions. The good thing is that he's so obvious with the very specific way he acts and talks that he's easy to out. It just takes keeping eyes on him so if he starts up again, his history as a serial harasser won't be swept under the carpet.

I hope the Farms will continue to keep an eye on this nutjob after this media scrum has died down. He's the kind of cow that never dries up, just changes their pasture.
 
What kind of leverage does Jonathan have over people at places like google and twitter to get this all star censorship? It's not as simple as being a troon. I hope there's a warrant for his hard drives soon, because that's the only reason I can imagine right now.
 
What kind of leverage does Jonathan have over people at places like google and twitter to get this all star censorship? It's not as simple as being a troon. I hope there's a warrant for his hard drives soon, because that's the only reason I can imagine right now.
It's as simple as being a troon and a pedo. Google and twitter are run by troons and pedos who look after their own.
 
Johnny came from Langley CA
Scooty-puffed her way to McDonalds for dollar drink day
Plucked her eyebrows on the way
Waxed her balls and then he was a she
She said, hey babe, take a walk on the wild side,
Said, hey honey, take a walk on the wild side.

Got the ferry back from out on the island,
In the bathroom she was everybody's darling,
But she never lost her head
Even though she's a massive sped
She says, hey baby, take a walk on the wild side
Said, hey babe, take a walk on the wild side
And the underage girls go,

Doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo
Doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo
Doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo
Doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo
Doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo
Doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo
Doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo

Apologies to the late, great Lou Reed.
 
What kind of leverage does Jonathan have over people at places like google and twitter to get this all star censorship? It's not as simple as being a troon. I hope there's a warrant for his hard drives soon, because that's the only reason I can imagine right now.
There is no leverage.
About 250ish pages back JY was tweeting to another trans person about teaching them how to fill out the harassment report, the “exact wording” they had to use to have accounts taken down.
I think JY just found a way to manipulate the lower level employees who deal with the report shit.
 
Back