Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

07/18/2019 Summary.

848777


Watch Nick's show for Stan's affidavit.






weeb07182019
 
07/18/2019 Summary.

View attachment 848777

Watch Nick's show for Stan's affidavit.






weeb07182019

Truly, a terrible day for rain...
 
Vic is right, though. If someone doesn't let you know that what you're doing is wrong, what are you supposed to do? If you presume that it, in fact, is not acceptable to do something in the absence of positive consent, you would be morally unable to do literally anything ever. You would not even be able to speak to anybody. Asking for consent without consent to speak would be wrong, and thus the other party also could not consent, because that would require you to positively consent to them speaking to you, which, as we already covered, would be unacceptable.

We're humans capable of empathy. We can usually do a pretty good job of understanding what other people want based upon body language, assuming they're being honest in their body language. The idea that positive consent at every step of the way is necessary is absolutely absurd on its face, and is indicative, in my estimation, of a person who seriously lacks empathy.

I can only imagine what their life is like. Unable to read body language and non verbal cues, asking for consent every step of the way. Mute people must scared the shit out of them :story:

Lord, the interactions they had to initiate sex must've been priceless :story: Just imagine

Them in the heat of the moment

Their parter

"can I kiss you?"

"yeah OK"

"can I put my tongue in your mouth?"

"uh, yes?"

"can I take off your top?"

"uh, yes?"

"can I take off your pants?"

*nods*

"please say yes, don't nod your head, I don't know what that means"

It's a wonder any of them aren't virgins anymore, of course, maybe they still are who am I to say they aren't? :jacepout:Here I thought sex was supposed to be this sticky, sweaty fun thing 2 people did with their privates. Turns out it's just 98% asking them a question and waiting for them to say yes.

Vic was in the studio talking about a director being silent on if his performance was okay. And he was quoting Plato when he said it

Jesus this thing came back? I remember it from like the beginning of this whole situation when Monica, marchi and hanleia came out with their stories.

Also of course Dominique would misrepresent everything, that's kind of her job. I mean look at what she does at cons, she dresses up like a thot and misrepresents to people that she's a 20 something that's actually relevant in any way
 
Also of course Dominique would misrepresent everything, that's kind of her job. I mean look at what she does at cons, she dresses up like a thot and misrepresents to people that she's a 20 something that's actually relevant in any way
Isn’t Dominique Sky the trashy thot who tried to cause a scene at one of Vic’s convention events? Iirc she used someone else’s pass, stupidly made evidence of her being there by taking a picture with a con-goer who posted it on Twitter, and then she tried to record a video of her emotional breakdown of seeing Vic until security escorted her out
 
I can only imagine what their life is like. Unable to read body language and non verbal cues, asking for consent every step of the way. Mute people must scared the shit out of them :story:

The only good thing about this nonsense is perhaps it will keep some of these defectives from reproducing.
 
I was thinking about this in the shower the other day. It is obvious that Ty is not Nick's source for the deposition videos, at least not directly (as he is bound by the agreement, and would be in deep shit if he breached it). For Nick to acquire the videos, he has to know somebody that:

a) has access to the videos and,
b) is not bound by the agreement.

The only people I could think of who fit these criteria are Beard's daughters (one of them works at BHBH, if I'm not mistaken). Nick could also potentially have a source at the videography/transcription company leaking stuff, but that seems less likely.
Or Ty is the source, and they're banking on "Nick is a journalist" to cover their asses.

Wasn't the agreement that no one would be able to watch any of the depo videos without consent from both parties? My understanding of this whole scenario has been that they agreed to let nick show the vids in an attempt to "expose" vic using a video format instead of text, to show he wasn't being misrepresented in the transcript and it's exactly what he said during the depo. Part of that agreement must've been to show MoRons depos as well as Ty probably would've disagreed to show vic's depo only and probably added the extra stipulation in

Did Ajay delete his tweet? I can't find it.
It should have been archived.

Well he's quite far out from this lawsuit, in the "definitely not going to be sued" and "will probably have a few tweets to post about how the justice system is a piece of crap, should vic win the lawsuits" categories.

Again, Ajay, remind me why the fuck are you on twitter getting involved in these things that have no bearing on you whatsoever and is being handled as it should be (in a court of law) when you say you have a mom who is probably terminally ill? If I were in a similar situation, I'd have my priorities in order and stay off the fucking net and either be doing everything in my power to help her or spending every second I could with her. At the very least I'd refrain from posting about things that, again, are being handled by a court of law as it should have been from the start and do not affect me in any way.

Ron is an Article 4 free inhabitant traveling and Nick Reekita has violated his copyright protection. Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the constitution clearly states his power of copyright. RON DOES NOT CONSENT!

AM I BEING DETAINED??????

Objection to form. You can refuse to answer that question :suffering:

not that it stopped the crack team of autists here at KF from figuring a bunch of them out anyway

Besides Monica and the twins, has the person in the 3rd story been identified?
 
Isn’t Dominique Sky the trashy thot who tried to cause a scene at one of Vic’s convention events? Iirc she used someone else’s pass, stupidly made evidence of her being there by taking a picture with a con-goer who posted it on Twitter, and then she tried to record a video of her emotional breakdown of seeing Vic until security escorted her out

Yup

The only good thing about this nonsense is perhaps it will keep some of these defectives from reproducing.

That and the soy they consume on a daily basis. Atleast they'll be able to lactate

A question for the kiwis that know the law and it's procedures more than I do (nearly everyone). Is it normal that Mr Supah Lawyer, Casey Erick, went full objection to form in all the questions in both depositions, or was that a very exceptional sperging on his part?

If I remember correctly, I think nick said that it's OK to do that and the "non responsive" objections as it doesn't strike the answers off the transcript it just notes that they have an objection to the question or answer cos it's not how they wanted it to be phrased. It's up to the court to decide whether or not to agree to these objections. Also it could be that the objections he laid weren't objections at all but just signaling to Ron that he had to think properly before he answered the question. Of course, Ron just deadpanned a "I do not recall" for all of his responses so it's likely these objections might not stand but Ty's non responsive objection might due to Ron not answering "yes", "no" or "I don't know" despite being told to answer as such multiple times

Wait what?

So Stan is a witness for Vic? Not MoRon?

Dun
Dun
Duuuuunnn....

This gets more interesting everyday

Front side of building before the fire
View attachment 847949

Back side of building
View attachment 847950

Hey look, it's an accurate representation of MoRon, Marchi and Funimation rn :story:

T. Greg Doucette says that Ron and Monica have filed their TCPA motion. It's 490 pages. He's working on uploading it for everyone. edit: (or just the exhibits alone are 490 pages)

View attachment 847978

Did they really put an objection to all of Ron's tweets in that thing?
 
I know it's been a while, but just letting people know that Funimation is still in a lawsuit with Kojicast as well:

Funny, this case is not on re:SearchTX. Any willing to collect the documents?
 
Rather underwhelmed by the Dahlin affidavit given how Nick used it to generate hype for his stream.

Still, it gets the message across. The only possible witness, the man who the court and jury would immediately look to to verify the events of that night...

Basically says it didn't happen.

Yeeeeesh.

What more were you realistically expecting? Dahlin to claim that it was actually Monica assaulting Nick, Dahlin to claim he's never even met Monica, or to say she's been texting him non-stop for weeks trying to get him to lie?

It basically paints her to be a giant liar. Sure, all of those tears in the deposition were obviously fake, but now there's no doubt, and if she's willing to lie about that, then is there anything else she won't lie about? How can any reasonable person on the jury be expected to trust her at all?

Maybe you were expecting something a bit more substantive, but how many words does it take to say, "None of that actually happened." and "Oh by the way if it did, I would have have noticed." and "Had I noticed I would have done something about it."?
 
I know it's been a while, but just letting people know that Funimation is still in a lawsuit with Kojicast as well:

Funny, this case is not on re:SearchTX. Any willing to collect the documents?

Patent infringement, huh? What’s the story?
 
Bit of a random curiosity related to all this, has Joel McDonald's name come up at all in this as a possible bad actor (pun intended) against vic?
 
Back