How many nationalists/neo-Nazis/fascists do we have on here?

[Belligerent Monk]

Currently I live in Germany and since SJWism has become a global phenomenon, politicians and the media here too debate about the Alt-Right, right-wing populism, remnants of the Third Reich, "racists'", "sexists" etc. or about Antifa and undocumented immigrants, unaware that for normal people, all the Germans are Nazis by default.

And that's just the thing, in'it?
The Germans in Germany are the traceable source of the most concentrated white guilt imaginable.
But a white German born in the United States who even remotely has any traditional beliefs may as well be Hitler 2: Electric Boogaloo.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

Here's an interesting graph from here. Whites have a lower in group preference than other groups. However because non liberal whites have a non negative in group bias, they get called 'white supremacists'. However blacks. hispanics and asians are not called supremacists for having an in group preference.

I guess being a supremacist is 'having an in group preference plus privilege' or something. Well except that Asians have better educational incomes and higher incomes on average than whites. Which according to the left can only be explained by 'privilege' and not by differing mean group IQs and differing group cultures.

Of course as soon as you talk about that stuff, you're definitely going to be called a white supremacist.

 

[Lemmingwise]

It amazes me how many channers would consider themselves fascists without realizing that an anonymous image board where people can share opinions without repercussions would never be aloud in a fascist state

also if you think your diffrent from another human becuase you have a diffrent ethnicity, your exceptional

I don't think that many channers consider themselves fascists in the first place. It's mostly shitposting/larping.

Also, we're heading towards a place in time where we live in a "liberal democracy", where people can't share anonymous opinions online without repercussions anyways though.

• I don't believe that the economy or information (such as news) should be centrally controlled by a quiet partnership between government and national/international corporations.
• I don't believe that the personal is political.
• I don't believe in identity politics, that birth or parentage makes you more or less of value than anyone else.
• I don't believe that the push for a "Positive Christianity", stripped of its inconvenient doctrines and principles and turned into a mouthpiece for "progressive" policies, while also pushing outdated paganism, is anything less than spiritual poison.
• I believe people should be free to choose how their children should be educated, including homeschooling, even if it means those children will be taught something I don't agree with.
• I think antisemitism is of the devil.
• I oppose forced sterilization, eugenics, euthanasia.
• I believe no person should be denied the right to self-defense, and denying him or her access to the tools for it gives the government unlimited power over them.

I agree with 5/8.

I do believe in identity politics and so should everyone. It's wholly natural and sensible to have a group identity (that can be personally embraced or rejected) and I think it's wholly natural that some will want to politically organize around the interests of such an identitarian group. I think it's alright to have mexican identitarian interest groups, black identitarian interest groups and also white identitarian interest groups. I don't consider that the world should purely be observed through a group identity lens, but it's a sensible part of the whole to not reject identity nor identity politics. Underlaying to that argument is that there are group differences and that such different interest groups serve different needs.

I think a lot of things get called antisemitism that aren't antisemitism and it's one of the principle taboos to even discuss whether that's the case or not, which should illustrate how the entire west is in practice very prosemitist.

I do not principally oppose forced sterilization, but probably would oppose almost all legislation that would propose it. It's not something that's easy to get right. I don't really have any arguments for this one, so fuck it, focus on the other ones.

Most people would probably consider me a fascist if they knew the full spectrum of my beliefs, whereas probably my only perceived "dangerous" opinion would be that white people should have the right to organize around group interests same as other groups.

It's funny because in a fascist state, I'd probably be considered a communist.

 

[NOT Sword Fighter Super]

I like pie.

 

[Corbin Dallas Multipass]

Here's an interesting graph from here. Whites have a lower in group preference than other groups. However because non liberal whites have a non negative in group bias, they get called 'white supremacists'. However blacks. hispanics and asians are not called supremacists for having an in group preference.

I guess being a supremacist is 'having an in group preference plus privilege' or something. Well except that Asians have better educational incomes and higher incomes on average than whites. Which according to the left can only be explained by 'privilege' and not by differing mean group IQs and differing group cultures.

Of course as soon as you talk about that stuff, you're definitely going to be called a white supremacist.

View attachment 848974

So... white liberals are statistically proven to be racist then? Because that's what I'm seeing here. Nothing more racist than not wanting to be around a certain race, after all.

I'm no kind of fascist or ethnostatist or any of that silly jive. I'm a bit of a nationalist, because I live in a nation, but as long as they follow the rules I don't care who else is in my nation.

I am the 90s version of not racist, meaning, no special treatment, for better or worse. Colorblind, basically. So by modern standards I'm a 9.4 on the hitler scale.

 

[Harvey Danger]

In a tabula rasa setting, starting from scratch, I don't see a moral problem with the concept of ethnostates. Most states throughout history were some version of one, either in population or in political structure. "Nation-state" literally means some particular people (a nation) has organized itself into a political construct (a state). Homogeneity is a huge boon for stability, political cohesion, and societal consensus.

However, the USA is not one of those states, it is explicitly an ideological state. And if anyone tries to turn the USA into an ethnostate, I'm joining the resistance and going 2nd Amendment on their ass.

Fascism sucks, since it's basically corporatism plus extra authoritarianism. Racism is dumb; adding racism to fascism makes everything even worse. It's a real curiosity the Germans of all people thought that mix was worth a try last century... but in Current Year 2019, it's formerly liberal lefty hedonists who are now giving it a try, so I guess there's no accounting for political insanity.

Put me down as a vanilla 1990s center-right conservative, with a streak of 1910s doom-and-gloom "the center can not hold" anarcho-libertarianism. I don't know what you'd call that. But I'm still stuck in the 2 genders world, so I guess that makes me a neo-Nazi Hitler supremacist, or something.

 

[ElAbominacion]

• I don't believe that the economy or information (such as news) should be centrally controlled by a quiet partnership between government and national/international corporations.
• I don't believe that the personal is political.
• I don't believe in identity politics, that birth or parentage makes you more or less of value than anyone else.
• I don't believe that the push for a "Positive Christianity", stripped of its inconvenient doctrines and principles and turned into a mouthpiece for "progressive" policies, while also pushing outdated paganism, is anything less than spiritual poison.
• I believe people should be free to choose how their children should be educated, including homeschooling, even if it means those children will be taught something I don't agree with.
• I think antisemitism is of the devil.
• I oppose forced sterilization, eugenics, euthanasia.
• I believe no person should be denied the right to self-defense, and denying him or her access to the tools for it gives the government unlimited power over them.

Each of those things that I oppose is a policy of historical fascism. Each of those things is also being pushed in America, but not by those who are called "fascists".

Let's just be clear about that.

I don't think antisemitism is of the devil and I don't outright oppose eugenics, now that we have the tools to actually mitigate the things that gave rise to it.

Euthanasia is maybe needed in cases like tetraplegy, and only voluntarily. But I'm a big fan of natural law.

The right to self-defense, 100% agree. The being against a push for PozChris, 100% agree. Personal is not political, ID politics exists ALWAYS as a reaction to its implementation.

I believe in power remaining in the hands of citizens, at the city level. I believe central government is poison and is the source of all tyranny.

I believe the right to say what you want is to be held sacrosanct, because many people died for the freedom to do so.

 

[Y2K Baby]

I'm a true patriot.
Where's "race realist"

 

[Caesare]

Is this a rollcall?

Present!

 

[Webby's Boyfriend]

The Germans in Germany are the traceable source of the most concentrated white guilt imaginable.

That's illogical because the majority of the victims of Nazi warcrimes was White. Even though the Nazis didn't see Jews and Slavs as White, most of them are. And the Third Reich was allied with the Japanese and was popular in the Near-East.

But whatever, SJWs and logic just don't get along, just like the Alt-Right and common sense ain't pals.

 

[Corbin Dallas Multipass]

That's illogical because the overwhelming majority of the victims of Nazi warcrimes was White, like European Jews and Slavs.

According to the nazis the jews and slavs weren't the right kind of white though, so it still works I think.

 

[crocodilian]

I want (non-slavic) whites to be the majority in my country. Run every inch of it, colonize my ass, do and implement whatever they think will work based on hard, empirical evidence and intelligent theories (i.e. not communism or other left-wing nonsense.) I would 100% start tea-sipping, jive-shucking or setting up shower chambers for the (non-slavic) white man's benefit if it made my country more prosperous, more safe, more internationally-relevant and overall a better place to live. It worked for India, Singapore, Japan, South Africa, Hong Kong, early America and tons of others; every historical text I can find says so. Why argue against it? Founding fathers, National Socialist Germany, British empire, wacky Dutchmen, I don't fucking care, just bring them all here and hand them the steering wheel.

tl;dr -

According to the nazis the jews and slavs weren't the right kind of white though, so it still works I think.

Nazi text contradicts itself often (that's the nature of politics) but there's plenty of evidence to suggest they considered all of Europe white. They even tried to ally with Poland, Russia and Britain initially. The only group they 100% despised were the Jews, and considering the rise of Bolshevism, communism and Weimar politics I don't blame them.

 

[Y2K Baby]

Nazi text contradicts itself often (that's the nature of politics) but there's plenty of evidence to suggest they considered all of Europe white. They even tried to ally with Poland, Russia and Britain initially. The only group they 100% despised were the Jews, and considering the rise of Bolshevism, communism and Weimar politics I don't blame them.

View attachment 849076

But then why did Hitler seem to legitimately resent southern Europeans- an area full of allies.

 

[Corbin Dallas Multipass]

But then why did Hitler seem to legitimately resent southern Europeans- an area full of allies.

Sometimes I think that Hitler fellow might have been just a bit fucked in the head.

 

[Terrorist]

Not many. Whenever race stuff comes up here it mostly devolves into the posters virture signalling over how not racist they are, how they love based minority grifter #42069, and dinesh dsouza level shit about democrats being the real racists. The Aut-righters will shuck and jive and do their memes for local color but it's mostly cuck stuff like that.

Segregationist-ish Nazbol so I guess I half-count. Don't hate anybody of any race (except gypsies), but we're too different to live together. Blacks were much more self-sufficient before integration.

I want (non-slavic) whites to be the majority in my country. Run every inch of it, colonize my ass, do and implement whatever they think will work based on hard, empirical evidence and intelligent theories (i.e. not communism or other left-wing nonsense.) I would 100% start tea-sipping, jive-shucking or setting up shower chambers for the (non-slavic) white man's benefit if it made my country more prosperous, more safe, more internationally-relevant and overall a better place to live. It worked for India, Singapore, Japan, South Africa, Hong Kong, early America and tons of others; every historical text I can find says so. Why argue against it? Founding fathers, National Socialist Germany, British empire, wacky Dutchmen, I don't fucking care, just bring them all here and hand them the steering wheel.

tl;dr -
View attachment 849068

So you want us huwhites to waste money civilizing your darkie asses? Yeah ok welfare queen, why don't you shine my shoes if you want a handout.

 

[Lemmingwise]

But then why did Hitler seem to legitimately resent southern Europeans- an area full of allies.

Probably because Italy had generally really bad commanders and they were a bit like having to take your little confused little brother and have him be one of the players on your team.

Mussolini had flushed some of the better commanders out in favour of loyalists.

 

[Y2K Baby]

Probably because Italy had generally really bad commanders and they were a bit like having to take your little confused little brother and have him be one of the players on your team.

Mussolini had flushed some of the better commanders out in favour of loyalists.

That's not a solid enough reason tbh.

 

[Unog]

I'm a nationalist. A civic nationalist though so I don't think I'm technically part of the demo you wanted to show up OP.

 

[Papa Adolfo's Take'n'Bake]

I am but a poor, immigrant pizza parlor owner, whatever gave you the 'fascist' idea?

 

[crocodilian]

Not many. Whenever race stuff comes up here it mostly devolves into the posters virture signalling over how not racist they are, how they love based minority grifter #42069, and dinesh dsouza level shit about democrats being the real racists. The Aut-righters will shuck and jive and do their memes for local color but it's mostly cuck stuff like that.

Segregationist-ish Nazbol so I guess I half-count. Don't hate anybody of any race (except gypsies), but we're too different to live together. Blacks were much more self-sufficient before integration.



So you want us huwhites to waste money civilizing your darkie asses? Yeah ok welfare queen, why don't you shine my shoes if you want a handout.

I'd prefer a job in the new white order, not welfare.