Blaire White / Robert Ryan White / Robbie Fagatron - Transgender token character in Maddox's cuck cabal

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
Nocturna said:
Porn perfomer or not, it doesn't automatically make someone a pedophile.
Click to expand...

Am I missing something? Something is missing.
White called him a PREDATOR, dude then got all huffy about how he's NOT a pedophile, how dare you!
blite.JPG
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Vorhtbame
MediocreMilt said:
Blaire confused this Princess Stef with a different Stef that is a pedo.
Click to expand...

Aah. So the predator comment was directed that other guy? just going from what I see the only words used was "predator", was that a later drive-by shit-tweet from White aimed at boycock-stef?
 
I have a feeling the nonbinary debate will turn into a trainwreck. Will anyone watch it?


LOL, the original person pussied out and didn't show up. They might have been the one from Twitter who was called a pedo. I'm confused on this.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Smaug's Smokey Hole and Silence of the Troons
howyadoin said:
It could be that the amount of testosterone isn't as much as a typical man's and that they believe breasts are heavily associated with women.
Click to expand...
I've heard of people wanting to do similar things in order to look more androgynous so that's probably what this person is going for. If they have big breasts that's too feminine and some think that taking the opposite hormone will cancel out their correct sex a bit more which I don't think is correct but probably sounds legit if you haven't studied that sort of thing. Unfortunately they're then going to realise that a big chunk of the androgynous look comes from the face and no amount of plastic surgery will make your more gendered face look androgynous while also looking good. At the end of the day I think these people are taking their prefered aesthetic a bit too far and need to learn to love their bodies as they are.

Also personally I feel that this "rejection" of accepting your assigned sex is actually more aligned with the gender binary than not. It's basically saying if you don't perfectly conform to the gender associated with your sex you are "other" and can't be that gender. It's no better than telling a tomboy that they secretly want to be a boy or a boy that they're gay if they're too feminine. Then again, nowadays these people are then told "oh sorry I've been ignorant, you're clearly trans, silly me" and they pat themselves on the back because now they're "woke" when they tell someone they can't be a girl if they don't like dresses

(To add, I'm not anti trans, I just don't think nearly as many people are trans as there seems to be now. Even among those who transition I think some are misguided)
 
  • Agree
Reactions: gumshoe, EveyDwyer, Rum Corps and 4 others
Candidae said:
assigned sex is actually more aligned with the gender binary than not.
Click to expand...

That can be summarized as "social constructs of gender roles aren't real!", something that used to be the point of feminism/equality for many, many years. It's just that now gender-specials(non-binary and troons) requires those social constructs to not only be upheld but reinforced so that they can claim to be different from them, or being an exaggerated stereotype of them.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: EveyDwyer, TerribleIdeas™, Candidae and 1 other person
Oscar Wildean said:
I have a feeling the nonbinary debate will turn into a trainwreck. Will anyone watch it?


LOL, the original person pussied out and didn't show up. They might have been the one from Twitter who was called a pedo. I'm confused on this.
Click to expand...
MediocreMilt said:
Why am I like this

View attachment 851379
Click to expand...

Nevermind the obvious photoshopped in wasit as well lol We've all see ncandids of her body, she's built like a rectangle lol
tuscangarder said:
That one person in the debate said they wanted to be genderless but are on male hormones and desired top surgery. How is that being genderless?
Click to expand...
Candidae said:
I've heard of people wanting to do similar things in order to look more androgynous so that's probably what this person is going for. If they have big breasts that's too feminine and some think that taking the opposite hormone will cancel out their correct sex a bit more which I don't think is correct but probably sounds legit if you haven't studied that sort of thing. Unfortunately they're then going to realise that a big chunk of the androgynous look comes from the face and no amount of plastic surgery will make your more gendered face look androgynous while also looking good. At the end of the day I think these people are taking their prefered aesthetic a bit too far and need to learn to love their bodies as they are.

Also personally I feel that this "rejection" of accepting your assigned sex is actually more aligned with the gender binary than not. It's basically saying if you don't perfectly conform to the gender associated with your sex you are "other" and can't be that gender. It's no better than telling a tomboy that they secretly want to be a boy or a boy that they're gay if they're too feminine. Then again, nowadays these people are then told "oh sorry I've been ignorant, you're clearly trans, silly me" and they pat themselves on the back because now they're "woke" when they tell someone they can't be a girl if they don't like dresses

(To add, I'm not anti trans, I just don't think nearly as many people are trans as there seems to be now. Even among those who transition I think some are misguided)
Click to expand...

It's pretty obvious that these people are nothing more than individuals who don't fit gender norms (Feminine women and Masculine men) and think that because they don't fit the gender expectations, they have to be an "other" no understanding that the concept of feminine women and masculine men are just gender stereotypes. Not that there's anything wrong with Feminine women and masculine men but what I am saying is just because you are a more effeminate guy or a masculine woman, it doesn't make you an "other", it just makes you non-conforming and there's nothing wrong with it.

It's prbably because I'm almost 30 in 1 tyear but I'm looking at that livestream and all I see are children who really don't know what they're talking about. Obviously they aren't children, they are young adults but still, it's just a very sad state that in 2019, we have people like this who just don't get common sense.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: EveyDwyer, The Pink Panther, howyadoin and 5 others
Smaug's Smokey Hole said:
That can be summarized as "social constructs of gender roles aren't real!", something that used to be the point of feminism/equality for many, many years. It's just that now gender-specials(non-binary and troons) requires those social constructs to not only be upheld but reinforced so that they can claim to be different from them, or being an exaggerated stereotype of them.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I always had trouble to relate to identity politics for this very reason. For me, gender roles in current year are not restrictive at all, and they were not restrictive in 90s already. Why is it so important to be certain gender/recognized as certain gender? This makes no sense whatsoever to me on emotional level, and I also think it's completely illogical.

It's black/white thinking when the reality is all shades of grey, but at the same time claiming that they are the proponents of continuum, while we, conservatives, are oppressive binary thinkers.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: EveyDwyer, TerribleIdeas™ and Nocturna
Gorilla Tessellator said:
Yeah, I always had trouble to relate to identity politics for this very reason. For me, gender roles in current year are not restrictive at all, and they were not restrictive in 90s already. Why is it so important to be certain gender/recognized as certain gender? This makes no sense whatsoever to me on emotional level, and I also think it's completely illogical.

It's black/white thinking when the reality is all shades of grey, but at the same time claiming that they are the proponents of continuum, while we, conservatives, are oppressive binary thinkers.
Click to expand...

Exactly! That's why it's so jarirng and hilarious that people are actingl ike you have to conform to gender norms as if this is the 1950s. It isn't, in the "current year", it's one of the best times to be alive and not feel you need to fit gender norms. Unless you come from a super traditional family who try to contorl your life, you can be a tomboy with no problem, in fact it can be seen as a positive. I mean obviously some may face an obstacle if they want to look super butch but there are lots of butch girls out there and they will have your back.

Admittedly the opposite end with super effeminate guys is a bit harder since society isn't as kind to men who like to wear makeup and dresses but there are spaces that will welcome non-conforming men (unfortunately though they are now hi-jacked and corrupted by these gender snowflakers)

The point is that to act liek you're oh so oppressed for being gender nonconforming in the Western world in the modern time is so ridiculous and just watch, these kids are gonna get into their 30s-40s and outgrow this fad and look back and cringe at it. I'm already seeing this with some my own age who are dropping the "non-binary" and trans bullshit as they get close to their 30s.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: tuscangarder, EveyDwyer, Petronella and 2 others
Nocturna said:
Exactly! That's why it's so jarirng and hilarious that people are actingl ike you have to conform to gender norms as if this is the 1950s. It isn't, in the "current year", it's one of the best times to be alive and not feel you need to fit gender norms. Unless you come from a super traditional family who try to contorl your life, you can be a tomboy with no problem, in fact it can be seen as a positive. I mean obviously some may face an obstacle if they want to look super butch but there are lots of butch girls out there and they will have your back.
Click to expand...

I wasn't a tomboy when I was a kid, but I was shy and I was never girly. I was a bit careless with my appearance, unlike my sister who was very much into dresses, boys, and expensive accesories. Obviously, my mother thought there was something wrong with me. Her solution? Sending me to the school psychologist because she thought I was a lesbian. Thing is, I was insecure about my looks and I thought that me dressing in a more girly style would make me feel ridiculous. I eventually overcame that.

That was in the late 80s. Now I have my own kids, I can see that parents aren't remotely like this. There is more freedom to be yourself, whether you're a girl or a boy. In the earliest 00's, boys played with dolls and girls played with trucks and nobody minded: it wasn't something negative as in "omg, he's gonna be gay!" nor people talked about transgenderism. It was just young kids exploring. Most just moved on from it and did activities more "proper" to their gender eventually.

Someone mentioned in another thread that these people have a need to feel they're making changes. Their identities ain't even to be "queer" but to be queer so everybody accept that. Their identities are the activism just by existing. Just like we make fun of people who do stupid shit to "trigger the libs", their whole existence has the only purpose to "trigger the conservatards". the notion that people were already accepting of what they are is a denial of their own existence.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Druish Princess, Vorhtbame, Maamtis and 8 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back