Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Jigglyjogglers said:
Smurfs only used it as punctuation or occasional word replacement. Which I suppose actually fits more what they're doing ("Let's all try to impeach along! I feel just impeachy! Don't you, impeach?"), but all that aside, "they sound like a really shitty Smurf" doesn't exactly have the same ring to it.
Click to expand...
It might have the right ring for those of us who grew up in the era where the Soviets were the baddies, but I think you're right on the subtler usage point.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Kinkshamer
Louis Gohmert got a good point of on Mueller being a front and a sockpuppet.


He asked Mueller who wrote the remarks that Mueller made about the report last time and Mueller said he couldn't comment and then Mueller did a little smirk. One of those ones that is a bit of a taunt and a bit of a wince. "Shit, he zinged me."

More and more it will be exposed that he was a Deep State plaything with Clinton and Obama stink all over him. He even showed up today with a Clinton-connected handler who dealt with protecting their IT guys during the classified materials mishandling scandal. He's a cut out for the Obamas and the Clintons and people like McCabe, Rosenstein, Comey, Brennan, Clapper, etc

I believe he had little to no oversight or input into the investigation and their releases and PR statements and the real shot-callers were doing whatever they wanted. He was content to be the feted rockstar while everybody else did the dirty work. He got exposed big time.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Vault Boy, Exterminatus and 14 others
AGreatDipAtAFairPrice said:
Louis Gohmert got a good point of on Mueller being a front and a sockpuppet.

He asked Mueller who wrote the remarks that Mueller made about the report last time and Mueller said he couldn't comment and then Mueller did a little smirk. One of those ones that is a bit of a taunt and a bit of a wince. "Shit, he zinged me."

More and more it will be exposed that he was a Deep State plaything with Clinton and Obama stink all over him. He even showed up today with a Clinton-connected handler who dealt with protecting their IT guys during the classified materials mishandling scandal. He's a cut out for the Obamas and the Clintons and people like McCabe, Rosenstein, Comey, Brennan, Clapper, etc

I believe he had little to no oversight or input into the investigation and their releases and PR statements and the real shot-callers were doing whatever they wanted. He was content to be the feted rockstar while everybody else did the dirty work. He got exposed big time.
Click to expand...

If they were all smarter, they should've at least told ol' Mueller the narrative.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Vault Boy, Exterminatus and 7 others
Hortator said:
Well they got their soundbite.
Click to expand...
Bingo!

That's all this was about. What we saw today was just the cultivation of soundbites for the upcoming election.

I may get some push back on this, but I firmly believe that this is why many of the officials asking questions today were attempting to get Mueller to read the report out loud. They want to have the voice of Robert Mueller saying shocking-sounding things from the report for campaign ads.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Exterminate Leftists, Dededon't and 11 others
Its like Mark Levin said about the second, longer half of the investigation: It was a New York Times/Washington Post op-ed that frequently cited and quoted where it should have been printed, if at all. "There's nothing to the letter of the law, not one credible thing in the last more than 200 pages of the report. Its an editorial!"

wa08b19ap9c31.jpg
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Lizard Pope, Dededon't and 25 others
I knew Mueller would a be a nothing burger in the end but holy shit.

AGreatDipAtAFairPrice said:
Its like Mark Levin said about the second, longer half of the investigation: It was a New York Times/Washington Post op-ed that frequently cited and quoted where it should have been printed, if at all. "There's nothing to the letter of the law, not one credible thing in the last more than 200 pages of the report. Its an editorial!"

wa08b19ap9c31.jpg
Click to expand...

If they're citing an editorial, they're way more desperate than I thought they would be. The man must either be clean as shit, or so inconsquencial that there's nothing that can actually be used at this point.

This fucking timeline
 
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Dracula's Spirit Animal, Syaoran Li and 10 others
JambledUpWords said:
View attachment 857479View attachment 857480View attachment 857481View attachment 857482View attachment 857483View attachment 857484

In other words, they have learned nothing from 2016
Click to expand...

The ignorance on display in these Tweets is fabulous.

You know what I just realized? These people didn't watch a minute of the event. They are going completely off of what people told them happened. No doubt a version of events where Mueller strode in with the confidence befitting a man of his reputation and settled the matter once and for all: dRumpfler is guilty! Guilty! GUILTY!

What a bunch of fucking rubes.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Dededon't, Syaoran Li and 16 others
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Horrifying
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Exterminate Leftists, Lizard Pope and 19 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back