Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

This pshop stuff again?

It's worth bearing in mind that the photo is allegedly taken in 1986. Or 89. It would have been on a cheap handheld camera with cheap film stock. That shit looks weird when you're used to digital everything.

His head is casting a shadow on the sign.

His foot is wedged right in front of the chair.

And if you look at Vic, he does in fact have an enormous head.

There is a figure standing there in the photograph. The head might be shooped, but the body is definitely there.
 
I used that fotoforensics website to have a look at that image. What do you guys think?View attachment 858483

This photo right here. You just proved that this is bullshit. There is no fucking WAY that woman in the middle is going to be as bright as that white-ass sign, but Vic isn't remotely, somehow. I could maybe believe the woman across from Vic in the glasses is right next to him maybe, but that chick in the yellow definitely is not in that picture with them.

This pshop stuff again?

It's worth bearing in mind that the photo is allegedly taken in 1986. Or 89. It would have been on a cheap handheld camera with cheap film stock. That shit looks weird when you're used to digital everything.

His head is casting a shadow on the sign.

His foot is wedged right in front of the chair.

And if you look at Vic, he does in fact have an enormous head.

There is a figure standing there in the photograph. The head might be shooped, but the body is definitely there.
There are too many inconsistencies of things casting shadows but other things that should also be casting shadows, relative to the things casting shadows, not casting shadows. That chair head. It should be casting a shadow on that lady. Vic's entire body stage left is somehow not casting that much of a shadow, if one at all, but the lady in the back is refracting one off those columns behind her.

Now I can see a shadow underneath the woman in the chair, but there's a lot of visual anomalies at play. I understand cameras in 1980s weren't that accurate, but they're not going to create radically different lighting situations in a single photo, unless those lights are in the environment themselves, which me thinks they're not.
 
Last edited:
This photo right here. You just proved that this is bullshit. There is no fucking WAY that woman in the middle is going to be as bright as that white-ass sign, but Vic isn't remotely, somehow. I could maybe believe the woman across from Vic in the glasses is right next to him maybe, but that chick in the yellow definitely is not in that picture with them.


There are too many inconsistencies of things casting shadows but other things that should also be casting shadows, relative to the things casting shadows, not casting shadows. That chair head. It should be casting a shadow on that lady. Vic's entire body stage left is somehow not casting that much of a shadow, if one at all, but the lady in the back is refracting one off those columns behind her.

Now I can see a shadow underneath the woman in the chair, but there's a lot of visual anomalies at play. I understand cameras in 1980s weren't that accurate, but they're not going to create radically different lighting situations in a single photo, unless those lights are in the environment themselves, which me thinks they're not.

Sign holder is a dude.
 
This photo looks insanely off. All three of these people have three separate color grades. The woman in the yellow shirt is far more yellow than the lady holding up the sign. Vic is WAY too contrast in comparison to everything else. This doesn't even look like a case of varying complexions, just different lighting altogether. Vic is hardly emanating a shadow on that wall, even though his elbow says he is relatively close to it, and there's a freaking lamp by his face. Maybe it's something about the way cameras worked back then, and I could be off, but it just looks like these three figures come from entirely different situations.

I don't know. View attachment 858535
It just doesn't make sense for the yellow shirt lady's head to be this small in comparison to Vic's, but also be further in the foreground.

View attachment 858554
This is what it looks like color-corrected, and it looks so photoshopped; it's insane. Where the fuck is all that light coming from the chick in the chair? Not to mention he looks like a giant in comparison to that chair. Not to mention the lack of shadow from the chair onto the woman in the back's shirt, but there's a shadow coming from the board she's holding onto her shirt.

...I seriously think Michelle color-shifted the photo to compensate for how yellow the lady in the chair is. This is bullshit.
I know this has been talked about alot but does the chair look weird to anyone else? It looks like it comes out too far (near where Vic's inner calf / third leg is)? Almost like there is a foot stool she is also sitting on. Though her position wouldn't seem to allow for that (she would be sitting too far forward or back if she was sitting on both.

Also given the angle of Vic's right foot, I feel like you would not see as much of his inner calf muscle, it seems to stick out way too much for the angle he is standing at.

Maybe I'm just tired and dumb though.
 
Sign holder is a dude.

Could've fooled me. Looks like somebody's grandma.

I know this has been talked about alot but does the chair look weird to anyone else? It looks like it comes out too far (near where Vic's inner calf / third leg is)? Almost like there is a foot stool she is also sitting on. Though her position wouldn't seem to allow for that (she would be sitting too far forward or back if she was sitting on both.

Also given the angle of Vic's right foot, I feel like you would not see as much of his inner calf muscle, it seems to stick out way too much for the angle he is standing at.

Maybe I'm just tired and dumb though.

Like this entire photo: that's debatable. In relation to the chair leg Vic does look a little space jammy there, but I wouldn't say he's floating. There is a bit of a tangent happening with his calf and the chair, but I'm not here to artistically critique. I'm primarily looking at proportions, and Vic looks unnaturally huge in comparison to the blonde lady.
 
Can someone link the original ?

Dafug.jpg

There is some squarish weirdness around the neck.
Edit:
In PS zoomed in
In Shop.png
 
Why is #kickvic so active in Ohio? Way back at the start we had the Facebook group trying to photoshop stuff, based in Columbus Ohio. Then we had that guy a few months back trying to say that Vic was charged at Ohayocon, which once again is in Columbus Ohio. And then we have that troon once again coming out with a story about Ohayocon. And that’s before the side shit like the Colossalcon spergery.

This really isn’t a place where something like #kickvic is going to find friendly territory, it’s gone solid red since 2016 and is only getting more red since.

Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action, but what the hell is FOUR times?
4 times is a priority target.
 
This pshop stuff again?

It's worth bearing in mind that the photo is allegedly taken in 1986. Or 89. It would have been on a cheap handheld camera with cheap film stock. That shit looks weird when you're used to digital everything.

If it's a genuine photo she shouldn't have any problems producing the original. Clearly she would have had to have scanned it to share it at all because it's so old that it predates consumer digital cameras. If she can't or won't, I think it's pretty damned obvious it's bullshit. That the school itself denies that Vic worked there or would have been there, so there's reason for doubt.
 
Last edited:
Whether the picture is real or not, it was not taken at LCA. Theres a picture from a Liberty University yearbook showing a Sherlock Holmes play and you can see the same wallpaper in the background. So even if the picture is real it doesnt prove Vic was at, let alone taught at, LCA.
 

Attachments

  • unknown-17.png
    unknown-17.png
    860.8 KB · Views: 160
Ah yes she has attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Makes sense.
Your autism is explosive.
Tonight I have another cunt who decided to step up to play.
View attachment 857867
Is it just me or is there a bad case of crabs going around the #kickvic community?

Gabrielle Dawson / Gabby / Elle Dawson / L. / HulkIndex / HulkIndex_Cosplay

View attachment 857846
View attachment 857862
View attachment 857861
View attachment 857922
View attachment 858042
View attachment 857864

Meet HulkIndex, preferred name Gabby and preferred pronouns stupid/cunt/whore an exceptional costhot from Australia, which is so triggered by Vic's mere name she has to censor it like Jews censor g-d.

View attachment 857875

Dox:
Gabrielle "Elle" Dawson
236 Hugh St, Gulliver QLD 4812, Australia
View attachment 857947

Employment:
Dawson Panel & Paint
(Owned by her Dad)
20 Madden St, Aitkenvale QLD 4814, Australia

Now what's funny is in Australia it's really fucking hard to dox someone as there are absolutely no searchable government records in that shithole, and you have to rely solely on the Doxxee to dox theirselves, which at first glace you'd think she'd smart enough to avoid since she only lists a single Letter as her name.

Well turns out she's very fucking stupid.
View attachment 857960View attachment 857962
View attachment 857972View attachment 857963
View attachment 857949
View attachment 857948
View attachment 857973

Remember kids, stay in school
View attachment 857977

The only reason I came across this bitch was because I decided to go through someone's GF's likes to see if she was going to try and flip #kickvic and accuse Vic of rape and found the above gem. Upon further research it turns out this bitch is fucking crazy; like professionally diagnosed as exceptional.
View attachment 858003
View attachment 857984
View attachment 857986
View attachment 857989
View attachment 858001

Special shoutout to Special shoutout to Troon Lolcow Ana Valens
View attachment 857998

Now then let's go to someone else.
View attachment 858024
Also being such a lovely person behold her boyfriend.
View attachment 858015
View attachment 858016
View attachment 858017
Sebastian Torney
Employment:
Fleming Street Snack Bar
31 Fleming St, Aitkenvale QLD 4814, Australia

Social Media:
(Old Facebook)

Special thanks to @Far Queue and @Keystone for parsing and achieving this selection of tweets.
My god.

She's retarded.

And that dude looks like a real stand-up citizen.
 
Can someone link the original ?

View attachment 858575

There is some squarish weirdness around the neck.
Edit:
In PS zoomed in
View attachment 858579

Okay that could just be scratches or aging on the photo itself, but we have to look at the bigger picture. Overall, this looks fake. Look at the practical stuff: why is the shadow underneath Vic's chin so deep, but not the lady in the middle? Why is the complexion so distinct between all three of them, even though Vic isn't that dark, and the Lady in the middle looks practically yellow compared to the person in the back. Why is the lady in the middle so bright compared to everything else?

Just look at this shit.
858613
 
That picture is tripping me out. Vic is producing little to no environmental shadows despite there being two different light sources. Especially to the surface he's leaning on. But I'm not a master or anything.
You know what’s funny about this story, she says the name of the play is “the mousetrap”. Now I’m not sure if there actually is an Agatha Christie play by that name but anyone with any background in theatre immediately thinks of Hamlet when someone mentions a play called “the mousetrap.”

Hamlet Act 3, Scene 2
Basically Hamlet tried to bluff Claudius into admitting his guilt with a play that recreated how Claudius murdered Hamlet’s father.

Maybe it’s coincidence, but I wouldn’t put it past the exceptional people on Kickvic to actually be that obvious with their plans. They do seem to try and behave like comic book villains some times. Maybe she thought that if she made up a story that she thought was plausible then in her mind Vic would do something that confirmed his guilt on some other nebulous incident. But meanwhile in reality, methinks the lady doth protest too much about getting BTFOed.
 
You know what’s funny about this story, she says the name of the play is “the mousetrap”. Now I’m not sure if there actually is an Agatha Christie play by that name but anyone with any background in theatre immediately thinks of Hamlet when someone mentions a play called “the mousetrap.”

According to Wikipedia there is: The Mousetrap. The description of the plot mentions Monkswell Mannor (though curiously the sign in the photo reads "Monkwell Manor") as a setting in the play.
 
Okay that could just be scratches or aging on the photo itself, but we have to look at the bigger picture. Overall, this looks fake. Look at the practical stuff: why is the shadow underneath Vic's chin so deep, but not the lady in the middle? Why is the complexion so distinct between all three of them, even though Vic isn't that dark, and the Lady in the middle looks practically yellow compared to the person in the back. Why is the lady in the middle so bright compared to everything else?

Just look at this shit.
View attachment 858613
True , I noticed the squarish stuff all over the place
There was one old pic of Vic from that time . It looked similar . Need links

This pic looks off cause Vic is the odd one out...
 
Back