Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

The idea that an American politician has systematically assassinated 100+ high ranking politicians, journalists, and federal agents for over forty years without leaving a trace is beyond exceptional.

Try saying that sentence out loud and see how sane and rational it sounds.

Donald Trump is the President of the United States of America.

How sane and rational would that sentence sound 10 (heck, even 5) years ago?

I'm not saying I believe in all the conspiracies, but they wiretapped a presidential candidate, a Special Investigator quoted opeds to smear a sitting president, and the Democratic platform is abortions for trans women. We're living in clown world, and I have problems immediately dismissing weird ideas anymore.
 
Do FBI agents normally commit suicide on dance floors of clubs? Muh slay kween...
The idea that an American politician has systematically assassinated 100+ high ranking politicians, journalists, and federal agents for over forty years without leaving a trace is beyond exceptional.

Try saying that sentence out loud and see how sane and rational it sounds.
Both of these arguments are what is known as insufficient Bayesian evidence. Neither of you has sat down and computed any conditional probabilities. Yet both of you seem awfully sure of yourselves. Neither of you deserve to be!

If you're willing to sit down and do the arithmetic, I'm happy to see what you have to say. If you're not, at least don't go around acting like you know what the fuck you're talking about.
 
Yeah except you're a tard. Short term rates on US borrowing money are already going up because the tax cuts have resulted in the US having to borrow more. The debt keeps soaring. Again, you are a tard who should learn basic economics
Maybe you should quote who you're responding to. I'm not sure whose argument you were addressing.
 
Both of these arguments are what is known as insufficient Bayesian evidence. Neither of you has sat down and computed any conditional probabilities. Yet both of you seem awfully sure of yourselves. Neither of you deserve to be!

If you're willing to sit down and do the arithmetic, I'm happy to see what you have to say. If you're not, at least don't go around acting like you know what the fuck you're talking about.
SOmetimes I feel like if we did all the math, we'd be able to mathematically prove that this timeline had a minuscule chance of occurring the way it did. That there's some kind of weird fucko going on in the background that we don't have the ability to quantify.

Hell, if you'd told me in 1990 that the Hamburger Kingdom would abandon space to the Vodka Trogs and the Pollution Goblins in order to cater to the insane delusions of Communist LARPers and shrieking troons, I'd have told you to put down the crack pipe. If you'd thrown in HRC looking like a fucking comic book supervillain and Donald Trump being president I'd have started looking for your tard wranglers. If you told me that people on the LEFT would be advocating for repealing the 1st Amendment harder than the 2nd Amendment and that the news would blatantly flat out lie about stories and falsify evidence with judges from fucking Volcano Sacrifice Island blocking federal decisions, I'd have checked you for a fucking trepanning scar. If you told me some fucking sped would steal his buddy's idea in college and become Mark "Lizardman" Zuckerberg and some other spaz would go from selling flamethrowers through the fucking mail to putting a fucking coupe in orbit to recreate the scene from Heavy Metal, I'd have wonder if the KGB had shot me in the face and it was all a fucking last trickling of bioelectricity going through my grey matter. Add into that some fucking mudders knocking down the Twin Towers (Actually, after 1994's bombing I'd have believed it, to be honest), Bush JR getting elected and trying finish Iraq to prove he was better than Daddy-kins, a book about a boy wizard becoming the religion to replace Jedi-ism for faggoty belief systems, I probably would have gently put you down with a fucking bolt gun to put you out of your obvious misery.

It seems like since 2000 if it has almost no chance of happening, it's going to happen.

It feels like reality keeps hitting on 20 and getting an ace, putting everything on Red-19 on the roulette wheel after it's done spinning and watching the ball suddenly levitate over there, and winning the fucking lottery every fucking week.

You can practically predict the future by betting on what everyone says won't happen.
 
That's an intriguing idea. I guess I would say that since I didn't expect any of these outcomes, there was something significantly wrong with my model of the world before they happened. Clearly there was a bunch of stuff I didn't understand, and I would need to understand it before probability even begin to shed light on the problem.

The sad news is, I still don't understand any of the stuff.
 
The Clinton Foundation, and the Clinton's themselves, are tied into some shady folks. A lot of the "bodies" on the clinton body count, if they were actually murders, were done by people with more skin shutting them up forever than the Clintons.

Hilary & Bill participate in some really complex & well obfuscated scandals. They have a long history, all the way back to Governor of Arkansas, of figuring out ways to get money and muscle opponents that leave JUST enough plausible deniability. And sure, taken one by one, you think 'oh come on'. But it keeps happening. And then bodies of people with potential dirt on the Clintons DO keep turning up, and it does make one wonder.

tl;dr
They are probably at least indirectly responsible for some folks turning up dead (will no one rid me of this troublesome whistleblower) but most of the Clinton Body Count lists are full of obviously unrelated deaths. Which is a shame because it makes people ignore the real headscratchers.


Edit:
For example:

Stanley Huggins. He was a Memphis Lawyer, died of pneumonia and his office was broken into and record stolen. Now, he was involved in the White water investigation, but had other dealings in Memphis as well. Its very well possible Stanley had criminal clients very concerned about record leaks, and they went in to destroy records. But then his medical records were sealed by Attorney General Janet Reno. Why would the Attorney General seal medical records for a death by pneumonia?

On the other side of the scale you have David Drye who died in a small plane crash. While there are a bunch of ways to sabotage a small plane, there are also a lot of ways for you to just die without any need for spook involvement.

Also the case of John Ashe, who did likely have dirt on the Clintons, but he was arrested on bribery charges that were not directly related to Clintons/CGF. His trial, however did concern people more connected and ruthless than the Clintons. If he was killed, it was almost certainly by the very literal criminal gangsters he dealt with, not the pubic Clintons.

And in the dark grey middle ground you have guys like Klaus Eberwein, a Haitian official who made no secret of his dislike of the Clinton Global Foundation*. However while he had expressed willingness to testify against the CGF under oath*, the trial he died during was about missuse of PetroCaribe funds (Venezuelan Oil Program) and nothing about CGF. The Clinton's likely sleep better knowing he's unable to testify against them and their foundation, but his death didn't do them any direct & immediate good.
*And this may need to be taken with a grain or two of salt, as in his eyes it seems the real crime the CGF committed seems to have been not giving him any payoffs or kickbacks, and he felt left out & disrespected. It is very likely he could have been bought off rather easily and cheaply, a much more prudent move if the Clintons are as evil as to believed; of course history is full of smart people making obviously dumb moves.
 
Last edited:
What the fuck?

(Archive)

For those who didn't click the link: "What people need to see in this newly formed @maureendowd /@SpeakerPelosi / @realDonaldTrump axis of shevil is that white supremacy relies on dismissing, silencing, and undermining women of color. Putting them in their place by any means necessary."

This woman needs to share whatever drugs she's on.

The replies are a riot, including her attempts to walk back the bit about Pelosi while somehow simultaneously still standing by it. I think she just discovered the line that the "Squad" had all been edging up to and poking at themselves, that line being just how much of a racist you can call Pelosi before getting in trouble.
 
The replies are a riot, including her attempts to walk back the bit about Pelosi while somehow simultaneously still standing by it. I think she just discovered the line that the "Squad" had all been edging up to and poking at themselves, that line being just how much of a racist you can call Pelosi before getting in trouble.
It's like watching children prod an overindulgent teacher. At the end of patience is a great anger.
 
Gotta talk about something, anything but the fact that an FBI agent investigating the clinton foundation just 'committed suicide' in public at a dance club.

View attachment 859037
Yeah that's weird, but what would offing a single FBI agent accomplish? It's not like an 'X-files' situation where there's only one or two agents on the case, right?
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Kinkshamer
14f9e787b019687889ca9f0436d75e39.png

096bf72e7741bd2339dead3432979c95.png

689fa0f48b6f59fb4b9b48a5f1c199e3.png


CNN sure hires some awfully strange people with curiously strong opinions. I can't wait for the "Conservatives pounce" headlines.


Not lying, you should let CNN and other media know about that. That racist asshat shouldn't be working in media
 
What the fuck?

(Archive)

For those who didn't click the link: "What people need to see in this newly formed @maureendowd /@SpeakerPelosi / @realDonaldTrump axis of shevil is that white supremacy relies on dismissing, silencing, and undermining women of color. Putting them in their place by any means necessary."

This woman needs to share whatever drugs she's on.
I especially like how identity politics suddenly becomes divisive for Dems once one of their own is targeted by it, as the comment thread shows. I've been noticing that during the entire conflict with the "Justice Democrats" (including the "Squad") and the establishment Democrats.
 
Something to point out, even a couple people I know that are Democratic believe that Trump will win 2020. The DNC is so fragmented, that they're practically handing the win to the opposing party. Whether that's their end goal or not, it's not a farfetched prediction.

I hope I'm wrong, but again, seeing grown adults act like children for the camera is embarrassing. Donald Trump is merely "winning" because the other side is losing so bad while they feed this toxic venom to fuel him. Nothing he is doing would be considered significant for a re-election aside from triggering TDS and posting on Twitter. Pyrrhic victory.
 
Something to point out, even a couple people I know that are Democratic believe that Trump will win 2020. The DNC is so fragmented, that they're practically handing the win to the opposing party. Whether that's their end goal or not, it's not a farfetched prediction.

I hope I'm wrong, but again, seeing grown adults act like children for the camera is embarrassing. Donald Trump is merely "winning" because the other side is losing so bad while they feed this toxic venom to fuel him. Nothing he is doing would be considered significant for a re-election aside from triggering TDS and posting on Twitter. Pyrrhic victory.
That's what a lot of people here have been saying and frankly I agree.

If the Democrats had dropped SocJus, not spent the last 3 years in hysterics and put forth a half way decent candidate Trump in all likelihood would be a one term president.
 
Back