ContraPoints / William Nicholas Parrott / Natalie Wynn Parrott / Nykytyne2 - GamerGhazi Cannibalism Victim, Youtube "Intellectual"

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
855219

So am I, Nick. So am I.
 
The left wing outlets are interviewing him and not the right wing ones because the left wants to associate the entire right with white nationalism, and can frame the interview as " a talk with avid supporter of white supremacy, Richard Spencer, who is your typical, average republican".

The right doesn't want to be linked to him, or accused of promoting him, so they ignore him.

Same reason this site has massive threads on most left wing lolcows and small ones on most right wing ones, with a few exceptions like Carl Benjamin. Drawing attention to the other side's tards while trying to ignore your own is a standard tactic.

See also why Jonathan Yaniv was on Infowars and mentioned by Tucker Carlson.
 
In a communist society, "YouTuber" wouldn't be a job, and you'd be working in the fields 20 hours a day instead.

Remember that, Contra.

Some historians have noted that it was during this time that Soviet propaganda began to depict homosexuality as a sign of fascism

Reminder every good communist knows that fags are LITERALLY HITLER.
 
Reminder every good communist knows that fags are LITERALLY HITLER.
Paul Cockshott wrote an interesting blog post about how gay people (gay couples especially) are more likely to be wealthy because they have a much lower chance of raising families:

Based Cybersocialist Nigga said:
You might initially think that economic class position had nothing to do with homosexuality, but it does not take long looking at the empirical sociological literature to come to the conclusion that this is mistaken. There is a connection, but it is that the interests of gays tend to be aligned with that of the propertied classes, rather than being independent of conflicting class interests. First, the literature on class attitudes to homosexuality shows that working class people are more likely to be hostile to it, and people from higher social classes more likely to be favourable or tolerant towards it [1][2]. Second, published data shows that gay couples are, on average, significantly better off than straight ones. On both attitudinal grounds and economic grounds therefore, the gay straight polarisation axis, rather than being independent of the class polarisation axis turns out to be tilted with respect to it.
 
Paul Cockshott wrote an interesting blog post about how gay people (gay couples especially) are more likely to be wealthy because they have a much lower chance of raising families:
That's very interesting, thank you for sharing. Anecdotal observation, but historically speaking it seems like societies that were more accepting of male homosexuality were also quite misogynistic. That's part of the overall fallacy of intersectional politics, women and gay men don't necessarily have a mutual benefit by campaigning against society together. In fact, the opposite would almost make more sense to me. Women's rights and acceptance of male homosexuality are by no means codependent political stances.
 
Last edited:
Paul Cockshott wrote an interesting blog post about how gay people (gay couples especially) are more likely to be wealthy because they have a much lower chance of raising families:
When you look at it this way, it makes total sense that every corporation goes out of their way to put the rainbow flag on everything.
 
Since this hasn't been posted before
löä.png

The last tweet was, of course, not perceived as very PC and earned him a few indignant replies from troons.
kölköl.png
Did Contra finally take out @Nykysnottrans? :(
I was recently rereading the first pages of this thread and there was a period in time during summer (late June to early August) last year where he didn't post at all. He's probably just on vacation
 
Last edited:
I wonder how much longer he can go on like he is. Clearly from his Twitter feed in the past year or so he is completely consumed by transgender ideology in both real life and his inner life. He must be driving himself more and more insane with his hyper-focus on identity labels/politics (which the huge majority of the world either doesn't know or care about and never will) and his appearance. If he has descended into pure narcissism (which is what it looks like) he will probably just top himself once the well of attention and digital dick-sucking dries up. I can't see him reaching his 40s.

All YouTube "careers" fizzle out eventually, and in Nyk's case he has very little else in his life to fall back on. Nyk is a depressed husk of a person whose personality consists of makeup, teenage boy basement communism, costumes and the cult of personality his fans have projected onto him. Even he himself knows this is the case because of his edgy nihilism and not planning on living for more than another decade or so.
 
I wonder how much longer he can go on like he is. Clearly from his Twitter feed in the past year or so he is completely consumed by transgender ideology in both real life and his inner life. He must be driving himself more and more insane with his hyper-focus on identity labels/politics (which the huge majority of the world either doesn't know or care about and never will) and his appearance. If he has descended into pure narcissism (which is what it looks like) he will probably just top himself once the well of attention and digital dick-sucking dries up. I can't see him reaching his 40s.

All YouTube "careers" fizzle out eventually, and in Nyk's case he has very little else in his life to fall back on. Nyk is a depressed husk of a person whose personality consists of makeup, teenage boy basement communism, costumes and the cult of personality his fans have projected onto him. Even he himself knows this is the case because of his edgy nihilism and not planning on living for more than another decade or so.
He will go on as long as his sycophants churn out more blowfiles. Which doesn't seem to be slowing down anytime soon.

His last 5 videos were almost entirely about him being transgender, with the last 2 being especially insane and incoherent. I know his cult has an interest in presenting him as making "good points", but it's pretty hard for any sane, rational person to see that. I think that's why leftist news outlets are going so hard on making him seem legitimate. Because anybody outside the "uwu thigh socks and communist programming" crowd will just see an incredibly self-obsessed man.

It's funny to see people making cat videos regularly dwarfing him in terms of subscribers in views.
 
Back