- Joined
- Apr 4, 2013
Confirming that Marjan can't get laid because he spends 22 hours a day shit posting on here.
Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)
- Thread starter Ronald Gaygun
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
I am an expert. You can't prevent a woman from getting a divorce in any modern country. Period. The only reason divorces take time is when custody and division of property need to be handled. Nowhere in the US, as far as I know, is there still such a thing as a "fault" divorce, because courts don't want to get into the messy factfinding necessary to determine who did what over the course of a long marriage.
So basically Holden is talking out of his ass.
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2013
I think that's what Holden is talking about, custody and division of property. Custody battles do overwhelmingly favor the woman, this I know, but I'm not sure how division of property pans out.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
Anyway, marj. I know you tried to change the subject with that WSJ article since you can't substantiate your twisted fixation on shit that didn't happen. So let me change the subject as well (since I've already responded to your link).
It has been a running joke on this board that you are a user of methamphetamine. Is that just a shot at you for being in Eastern Europe, or do you actually use meth? No judgement. Just curious.
It has been a running joke on this board that you are a user of methamphetamine. Is that just a shot at you for being in Eastern Europe, or do you actually use meth? No judgement. Just curious.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
use your brain. i said that not many men who have kids do rape
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
Equal division of marital property if you go to trial with limited exceptions. You can quibble over some small details, but the court won't get into details of, say, giving the husband less because he cheated on the wife. It gets complex if you have indivisible property, like a single house, but that shit's handled every day.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
1) 22 percent of men accused of rape. not rapists. explained why.
2) rainn doesn't understand the nature of a contract like marriage, which already gives consent in itself. a woman can be assaulted in marriage but not raped.
3) you'd know, honey
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2013
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
just ask men like peter andrew nolan how it works out. before he had his divorce he used to work for NASA. when he got out of it he was 60k in debt.
married men with kids who commit rape. i meant married men, not kids, you slut
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
wow
Can you point to the contract term that says the husband can have sex whenever he wants?
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2013
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
He probably tried to keep the house. Dumb idea. Sell your half of it and pocket the money. Or hold onto it until you get the right offer, then sell. Either way, get the fuck out if you can't afford to go that far into debt.
I mean, what the fuck do you think happens when you get divorced when you own a piece of real estate? They take a saw and cut the house in half?
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2013
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
I'd love to stay and chat, @Holden , but I have work tomorrow. Because I have a job.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
would you like half of your paycheck to go so only seducer scum and rapists get women? cause that's what you're doing now
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
I'd honestly be more pissed off to find out I was putting food in your cancerous stomach.
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2013
Yet we can all take solace that he will die alone and unloved, probably from meth.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
Since the perception of the whole rape issue by feminized Western men is complete bullshit, I thought I would point out the obvious.
1. Feminist females define "rape" as being any sex they later regret. It is not so much that they will lie and say you raped them when they know you didn't. If you have sex and then they regret it for some reason, such as that you are of lower perceived status than they thought, then as far as they are concerned you "raped" them. Conversely, if you threw a female to the ground, ripped her clothes off and f***ed her without so much as a by your leave and she felt positive about what happened later on, it would probably not even occur to her to think she was raped. Increasingly the ZOG pigs and shysters are following this feminist definition of rape. Thus the very same physical actions on the man's part could see him categorized either as a great lover or rapist depending on the later claimed emotional response of the female. Since it is not possible to objectively examine an emotional response, it follows that most "rape" cases are now prosecuted on spectral evidence, similar to the Salem witch trials.
2. If we define "rape" as being forced sex, females do not think this is particularly bad or a big deal. Only self-hating manginas think rape is a big deal. Females like manly men who take charge of them and do what they want to them, not sniveling manginas begging them for sex and asking their permission nanosecond by nanosecond. Hence most erotic fiction aimed at females contains rape or quasi-rape scenes and females getting off on being raped is well known in criminology circles. In contexts where it is desirable and socially acceptable for them to have sex, females generally like being raped.
3. If females are not really opposed to rape, why then do they want men to be jailed whenever they claim rape? It is simply because feminist females arecriminally insane psychopaths who think that non-elite men should be jailed, robbed, killed or whatever whenever they feel like it. Sure they will come up with something bad you have supposedly done as an excuse to have the pigs attack you, but they regard this as a quaint formality.
4. Rape is not considered to be a big deal by evil Western regimes because of supposed physiological damage to the female (which is to say, because the female's feelings may be hurt). I mean, how f***ing ridiculous would that be - to imprison someone for years at enormous expense for hurting some skank's feelings. It is incredible that anyone takes this aspect of the rape nonsense seriously. Traditionally rape was a property crime against the female's owner, and so it remains. Today the ruling class assert that they own females, along with everything else. This is what feminism is all about. Therefore, as far as they are concerned, any sexual contact with females by non-elite men is a property crime against them. This policy is slowly being phased in and made more apparent. Eventually they will drop the silly hurt feelings bogosity and tell it like it is.
5. Sane societies do not revolve around the idiot "consent" or other mindless whims of females. In sane societies females are placed under the control of men such as their husbands, fathers, pimps or whoever, and those men decide when they will have sex or not within the rules of that society. Often itwould be considered the obligation females to have sex. After all, we all have unchosen obligations, and there is no reason why sex should be anydifferent. The crime of rape consists of forced sex outside the rules of society, such as a burglar forcing a married woman to have sex while robbing her house. As stated, it is really the same today, except it s the ruling class laying claim to all females. The consent thing is a red herring.
1. Feminist females define "rape" as being any sex they later regret. It is not so much that they will lie and say you raped them when they know you didn't. If you have sex and then they regret it for some reason, such as that you are of lower perceived status than they thought, then as far as they are concerned you "raped" them. Conversely, if you threw a female to the ground, ripped her clothes off and f***ed her without so much as a by your leave and she felt positive about what happened later on, it would probably not even occur to her to think she was raped. Increasingly the ZOG pigs and shysters are following this feminist definition of rape. Thus the very same physical actions on the man's part could see him categorized either as a great lover or rapist depending on the later claimed emotional response of the female. Since it is not possible to objectively examine an emotional response, it follows that most "rape" cases are now prosecuted on spectral evidence, similar to the Salem witch trials.
2. If we define "rape" as being forced sex, females do not think this is particularly bad or a big deal. Only self-hating manginas think rape is a big deal. Females like manly men who take charge of them and do what they want to them, not sniveling manginas begging them for sex and asking their permission nanosecond by nanosecond. Hence most erotic fiction aimed at females contains rape or quasi-rape scenes and females getting off on being raped is well known in criminology circles. In contexts where it is desirable and socially acceptable for them to have sex, females generally like being raped.
3. If females are not really opposed to rape, why then do they want men to be jailed whenever they claim rape? It is simply because feminist females arecriminally insane psychopaths who think that non-elite men should be jailed, robbed, killed or whatever whenever they feel like it. Sure they will come up with something bad you have supposedly done as an excuse to have the pigs attack you, but they regard this as a quaint formality.
4. Rape is not considered to be a big deal by evil Western regimes because of supposed physiological damage to the female (which is to say, because the female's feelings may be hurt). I mean, how f***ing ridiculous would that be - to imprison someone for years at enormous expense for hurting some skank's feelings. It is incredible that anyone takes this aspect of the rape nonsense seriously. Traditionally rape was a property crime against the female's owner, and so it remains. Today the ruling class assert that they own females, along with everything else. This is what feminism is all about. Therefore, as far as they are concerned, any sexual contact with females by non-elite men is a property crime against them. This policy is slowly being phased in and made more apparent. Eventually they will drop the silly hurt feelings bogosity and tell it like it is.
5. Sane societies do not revolve around the idiot "consent" or other mindless whims of females. In sane societies females are placed under the control of men such as their husbands, fathers, pimps or whoever, and those men decide when they will have sex or not within the rules of that society. Often itwould be considered the obligation females to have sex. After all, we all have unchosen obligations, and there is no reason why sex should be anydifferent. The crime of rape consists of forced sex outside the rules of society, such as a burglar forcing a married woman to have sex while robbing her house. As stated, it is really the same today, except it s the ruling class laying claim to all females. The consent thing is a red herring.
well, of course. you love the idea that men who would never ever work be financed but hate the idea that men who would work are given an incentive to work. makes sense
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
While he typed this all out, Holden was singing this song:
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Actually, I got a tax refund last year.
- Status