An anon who claims to have hired a PI has posted a summary of his findings. Also claims to be uploading the dossier tonight.
I am instantly suspicious of the claim that someone anonymous spent thousands of dollars to hire a private investigator, even more so when most of the information is or claims to be from public records searches and things of the like.
In-person surveillance is generally the most costly thing a PI does. What do we get out of all this expense? Three lines.
Peter left his house 2 in 72 hours. The remainder of his weekend was spent pants-shitting.
Peter never went anywhere with his “family.”
Braceface and Jim seem like cool people.
Braceface does not have huge tits but her teeth could be seen from far away.
Paying thousands of dollars for that? And not even knowing why he left his house? It's questionable. I think it's likely, considering that the bulk of the alleged information is from allegedly public sources, that the person who posted it did some public record searches from a pay service for background checks, or something of the like, then dressed it up as a PI report to make it look more credible. If they hired a PI, they overpaid.
The information may or may not be accurate, but its sourcing disinclines me to treat it as reliable.
Agreed on general statements made in it, such as that a marriage
license is not the same as a marriage
certificate and that a license basically doesn't prove jack. Basically, a marriage license
permits a couple to marry, while a marriage certificate is a vital record that proves that a couple is actually married.
ETA:
Yeah, thought there was something kooky going on. I just can't believe he's so psychotic as to actually get a fake marriage cert. I mean, that shit has to be unlawful on its own.
And just to emphasize this, the document Peter has presented is a marriage license, not a marriage certificate. It is downright peculiar to present such a document as proof of something it does not prove, when a document, a marriage certificate, exists that would actually prove it.
Here's another "hmmm" moment.
Peter does not own a home.
Peter drives a hoopty.
He has filed for food stamps. Under his filing, he is listed as “Single.” If he was Married, he would report otherwise. This is Welfare Fraud.
A "hoopty?" That's a PI term? Most competent PIs would give you make and model, license plates, VINs, etc.
Secondly, if Peter is actually single, and actually did apply as "Single," why would that be fraud? It would be entirely accurate, since he is only alleged to be lying on the Internet.
Finally, this opening claim.
Peter could face not years, but decades. (Let that sink in.)
Please.
I don't rule out that a PI could have produced information like this, or produced something that was turned into this. I just see things that I would not rely on in making conclusions, especially considering the dodgy sourcing.
