Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

[Mr Snoid]

Awwww...

That's a clip from a fundraiser pic they put up a few months ago. The part THEY clipped is the crate Frank is standing on.

I'll always marvel at John's massively good fortune. At exactly the right time in his life, he met the ONE GUY on the planet who thinks he's a hot babe. And has lived as the nerd version of a pampered housewife ever since.

 

[Peace and Harmony]

I simply cannot begin to fathom how absolutely insane a person has to be to believe that MSM is "centrist corporate media", no fucking wonder that anyone three steps to the right of AOC is a Jew-murdering anarchocapitalist.

If you don't like how CNN structures its shows, maybe you should check out long-form interviewers on YouTube like Dave Rubin :^)

 

[AnOminous]

That's a clip from a fundraiser pic they put up a few months ago. The part THEY clipped is the crate Frank is standing on.

A rare non-screaming picture of the paypig manlet.

 

[Anti Fanta]

Yes, a one-on-one sexy beach-volleyball pick-up game taking place outside an office building at work hours. So many questions about that could be asked by an interviewer.

edit: instead of asking critical question that just makes him angry and turtles up, encourage him to add more and more shit to his stories. If he manages to get a story past one person it would likely bleed into his general repertoire.

This is such a hilariously pointless lie. It's also somehow one of his least realistic ones: Anyone who has tried to play volleyball one-on-one knows how fucking shit it is and that you stop after about 30 seconds/two or three attempts at a rally that go nowhere and go do something else like sunbathe or get a drink. It's just baffling that he considered this worth his time to even say.

 

[Mr Snoid]

A rare non-screaming picture of the paypig manlet.

Haha, yeah. They're the portrait of staid suburban sobriety. Frank probably had to practice that face in the mirror.

Man, I would love to hear from Frank's parents. In some ways their kid is a model East Asian overachiever -- well-schooled and paid handsomely by his employers. He also lives in a filthy house and plays videogames under blanket forts with his praying mantis "wife." Sadly, there'll be no little Wus for Mom and Pops to fuss over.

 

[Wendy Wheelchair]

See, this is legit fascinating, because as a Democrat, it shows Wu has learned nothing at all in 4 years. She's thrown her weight behind the least electable option for the Dems.

See, there's an argument for Sanders. Sanders is an insane ideological zealot with barely constrained rhetoric, but that might just be the thing to counter Trump, a fighting fire with fire approach.

Williamson reeks of limousine liberal, but that might legit work at a point where half the base regards themselves as galaxy brain elites who are too smart to vote right wing.

Biden and Delaney are both strong centrist options, who can provide a less extremist alternative to Dems who don't like Trump, but don't want to elect a goddamn commie maniac.

Warren? Warren is the exact problem that cost us the last election. She's Hillary 2.0, she's completely unelectable, the extremists don't feel she's extreme enough and the moderates feel she's too far left.

Regardless of which side you're on, the fact remains that in the last 4 years, many people have taken to heart that the last election was not a strong showing for us, and the Democratic party needs serious change to compete.

Wu? She's doing the same shit that had us watching her have a growing panic attack over the length of an evening, proudly declaring that "I'll be watching Hillary win!" and then slowly realizing that her brand of smug, milquetoast liberalism does not put asses in voting booths.

She has learned nothing, and still expects to be taken seriously.

Someone’s still stuck in the mindset of “Democrat good, Republican bad”. How can you support a party where at a debate, not one but two candidates brought up trannies (including “abortions for men”) and got applause for it? How can you support a party where every candidate would give free healthcare to illegal immigrants?

What separates Wu from any of the other Democratic thought leaders, who, more and more, are creating a space for Leftists to shove identity politics down everyone’s throat to the point that they give space for “marginalized voices” like the Ghoul some air of legitimacy?

 

[AirdropShitposts]

I simply cannot begin to fathom how absolutely insane a person has to be to believe that MSM is "centrist corporate media", no fucking wonder that anyone three steps to the right of AOC is a Jew-murdering anarchocapitalist.

View attachment 868324

If you don't like how CNN structures its shows, maybe you should check out long-form interviewers on YouTube like Dave Rubin :^)

View attachment 868325

"We have too many problems to treat the presidency as entertainment."
"If the goal of this debate was helping Democrats understand where canidates stood, it was a failure."

Oh honey, you're about thirty years too late. And I'm being generous.

Also, amusing coming from a candidate making their second run at a Congressional seat from Twitter.

 

[AprilRains]

A rare non-screaming picture of the paypig manlet.

Not pictured: Hired consultant holding a gun on Frank.

 

[Mola Ram]

Not pictured: Hired consultant holding a gun on Frank.

There's just too much evidence Frank enjoys his horrible, horrible life.

 

[AprilRains]

There's just too much evidence Frank enjoys his horrible, horrible life.

But that enjoyment is generally expressed with his mouth open, and I can't see stitches in his lips.

 

[Ken Rosenberg]

The party bosses probably decided who the candidate was two years ago, John-Boy. Everything you're seeing now is bread and circuses for the proles.

 

[Ghostse]

It turns out the Capital One hacker was a tranny. You add in Chelsea Manning and it becomes pretty clear that, on a per capita basis at least, trannies are vastly over represented in the area of cyber crime. That's Brianna's area of expertise -- cybercrime that is, definitely not trannies. I wonder if we'll hear more from him on the topic?

Individuals that are mentally ill enough to inject strange chemicals and wish to surgurically mutilate their bodies are poor security risks? You don't say.

See, this is legit fascinating, because as a Democrat, it shows Wu has learned nothing at all in 4 years. She's thrown her weight behind the least electable option for the Dems.

See, there's an argument for Sanders. Sanders is an insane ideological zealot with barely constrained rhetoric, but that might just be the thing to counter Trump, a fighting fire with fire approach.

Williamson reeks of limousine liberal, but that might legit work at a point where half the base regards themselves as galaxy brain elites who are too smart to vote right wing.

Biden and Delaney are both strong centrist options, who can provide a less extremist alternative to Dems who don't like Trump, but don't want to elect a goddamn commie maniac.

Warren? Warren is the exact problem that cost us the last election. She's Hillary 2.0, she's completely unelectable, the extremists don't feel she's extreme enough and the moderates feel she's too far left.

Regardless of which side you're on, the fact remains that in the last 4 years, many people have taken to heart that the last election was not a strong showing for us, and the Democratic party needs serious change to compete.

Wu? She's doing the same shit that had us watching her have a growing panic attack over the length of an evening, proudly declaring that "I'll be watching Hillary win!" and then slowly realizing that her brand of smug, milquetoast liberalism does not put asses in voting booths.

She has learned nothing, and still expects to be taken seriously.

Bernie is insane and a spineless leech who has never had an honest job, but he comes off as sincere I think he is honestly high off his own supply and sincerely believes his dumb policies will make things better, and wants to implement them because believes they're the right thing for the average Joe, vs the rest of the Dem field that only care about democrats the power and status of the DNC. Bernie appeals to the same neglected majority of Americans Trump appeals to, but is less bombastic so more tolerable.

Warren is Hilary 2.0, a completely tone-deaf bubbled ivory tower elitist with nothing but contempt for anyone she views as beneath her (everyone).

 

[Harvey Danger]

Warren? Warren is the exact problem that cost us the last election. She's Hillary 2.0, she's completely unelectable, the extremists don't feel she's extreme enough and the moderates feel she's too far left.

Warren is Hilary 2.0, a completely tone-deaf bubbled ivory tower elitist with nothing but contempt for anyone she views as beneath her (everyone).

The problem with the Hilary 2.0 comparison: you really can't underestimate the effect of Clinton being an out-and-out, FBI-investigated, un-indicted criminal. No matter how little you care about the technicalities of classified document handling, what the FBI found and listed was actual crime, which they named but declined to prosecute her. (Might have been for the best, it could have been seen as a coup if attempted during the election.)

That's before you get into the issues with the Clinton Foundation, the uranium scandal, the Benghazi lies, the 3 decades of shady dealings, etc. I spoke to a number of centrist and conservative friends/family who didn't like Trump, but were horrified by Hilary and finally made their Trump vote decision when the FBI letter came out.

Hilary was so toxic she broke her own party's primaries, the ideological conservatives who were trying to keep Trump out, and the rule of law itself. Warren is just strident and dumb. You aren't going to get "LOCK HER UP!" chants in a Trump vs Warren matchup. (Warren might even manage enough credibility to hit Trump on his big campaign promise failure to "drain the swamp".)

Which brings us back to John, who thinks the big problem is that Democratic candidates are "wasting their time arguing against centrist concerns that no Democrat is asking". If no Democrat is asking what 1/3 of the country wants to know about, and another 1/3 is entertaining, then someone needs a forum to smack those idiots like Warren into general acceptability and electability.

 

[AprilRains]

The problem with the Hilary 2.0 comparison: you really can't underestimate the effect of Clinton being an out-and-out, FBI-investigated, un-indicted criminal.

True, but neither can one underestimate the worst thing Hillary and Warren have in common: Every man over 30 looks at them and see his first ex-wife.

 

[Peace and Harmony]

Oh of course, a "pragmatist" who will not compromise an inch on the ultra radical left positions, unlike those child molesting """"""centrists"""""" who spend their days grabbing their dicks to pie-in-the-sky ideologies.

Well John you hate your father anyway so maybe these kids are actually better off!

Yes what better way to promote accountability and female empowerment than by electing a man scamming people out of their money so he can buy toys and fast food.

 

[Karellen]

Oh of course, a "pragmatist" who will not compromise an inch on the ultra radical left positions, unlike those child molesting """"""centrists"""""" who spend their days grabbing their dicks to pie-in-the-sky ideologies.

View attachment 869309
View attachment 869310

Well John you hate your father anyway so maybe these kids are actually better off!

View attachment 869308

Yes what better way to promote accountability and female empowerment than by electing a man scamming people out of their money so he can buy toys and fast food.

View attachment 869311

Well we know the fundraising ones didn’t come from her because it’s from an Android.

 

[UselessRubberKeyboard]

I simply cannot begin to fathom how absolutely insane a person has to be to believe that MSM is "centrist corporate media", no fucking wonder that anyone three steps to the right of AOC is a Jew-murdering anarchocapitalist.

View attachment 868324

If you don't like how CNN structures its shows, maybe you should check out long-form interviewers on YouTube like Dave Rubin :^)

View attachment 868325

Nice to see "canidates" making a return. Steve Jobs might be amazing, but evidently his spell checker software isn't up to John's exacting standards.

Was it made clear what John did to his (one of three) porche to make it so shiny he can see his own corn niblet teeth reflected in it? Please let it be another rattle can on the driveway job, preferably with cheap varnish.

 

[Ghostse]

The problem with the Hilary 2.0 comparison: you really can't underestimate the effect of Clinton being an out-and-out, FBI-investigated, un-indicted criminal. No matter how little you care about the technicalities of classified document handling, what the FBI found and listed was actual crime, which they named but declined to prosecute her. (Might have been for the best, it could have been seen as a coup if attempted during the election.)

That's before you get into the issues with the Clinton Foundation, the uranium scandal, the Benghazi lies, the 3 decades of shady dealings, etc. I spoke to a number of centrist and conservative friends/family who didn't like Trump, but were horrified by Hilary and finally made their Trump vote decision when the FBI letter came out.

Hilary was so toxic she broke her own party's primaries, the ideological conservatives who were trying to keep Trump out, and the rule of law itself. Warren is just strident and dumb. You aren't going to get "LOCK HER UP!" chants in a Trump vs Warren matchup. (Warren might even manage enough credibility to hit Trump on his big campaign promise failure to "drain the swamp".)

Which brings us back to John, who thinks the big problem is that Democratic candidates are "wasting their time arguing against centrist concerns that no Democrat is asking". If no Democrat is asking what 1/3 of the country wants to know about, and another 1/3 is entertaining, then someone needs a forum to smack those idiots like Warren into general acceptability and electability.

I don't think those crimes mattered too much. I very much remember all her shit, but all the Clinton voters I knew were complaining about witch hunts and how there was no firm evidence she really intended to break the law, or cover up that she broke the law, or that CNN leaking the debate questions to her was really that a big of a deal, or that the DNC fixing the race for her when Sanders turned out to be more than just token competition was really them railroading Sanders.

Most people voting clinton were going to vote for her with nothing short of HD video evidence of Hilary bludgeoning a baby to death with the flat side of an axe while the Pope, the Dahli Lama, Richard Dawkins, Ginsburg, and George Clooney all witness the event, say in turn "I am <name> and I attest for the record I am witnessing Hilary Clinton beat a baby to death with an axe" and then Hilary herself, covered in toddler blood and brains turned to camera and said "I am Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton, and being of sound body and mind, under no duress, have randomly selected a baby to beat to death with an axe for no reason other than that I wanted to, which you have just witnessed." and then held the axe handle up to the camera so her bloody finger prints could be seen clearly enough for them to be scanned for a federal search. Anything less they'd question if it authentic, or if still really represented Hilary's views.

And even then, as they admit they'd probably not vote for Clinton they'd say "You know it still makes me wonder what that baby did to deserve being beaten to death with an axe...."

 

[AnOminous]

Nice to see "canidates" making a return. Steve Jobs might be amazing, but evidently his spell checker software isn't up to John's exacting standards.

This illiterate cretin has been misspelling "candidates" since 2016.

https://twitter.com/search?q=(canidate%20OR%20canidates)%20(from%3ABriannaWu)&src=typed_query&f=live

 

[break these cuffs]

Nice to see "canidates" making a return. Steve Jobs might be amazing, but evidently his spell checker software isn't up to John's exacting standards.

Was it made clear what John did to his (one of three) porche to make it so shiny he can see his own corn niblet teeth reflected in it? Please let it be another rattle can on the driveway job, preferably with cheap varnish.

Reminder that he has to have purposefully done this so much that it has replaced his phone's autocorrect, or he is still manually choosing the wrong spelling every fucking time he does it. The fact that it was correct for a period leads me to believe he was either posting from a different device, maybe Frank's phone, or he accidentally chose the right spelling in a series of particularly bad Ambien hazes. This is also evidence that nobody, including Frank, reads John's shit because they haven't correcting this longstanding and embarrassing mistake. Actually, maybe they're as stupid as him and don't notice either. Even more interesting scenario, they like laughing at his stupidity as much as we do. Did we ever ask Warren if he pointed out this particular idiocy? Perhaps most likely, they do tell John about it and he has fried his brain so retarded he doesn't realize he's posting it wrong.