Zoosadist Zoosadism Megathread - Joshua "Kero the Wolf" Hoffman & Friends.

If you really had to who would you sex?


  • Total voters
    4,030
View attachment 869575
https://twitter.com/alu_ky/status/1153845858045181952

Imagine the audacity required to compare the civil rights movement of the 1950s to fucking animals and posting about it on Twitter

Looks like Aluzky doubled down on that post.
1564625813560.png


Here are some of the responses.
1564625861324.png


1564625920607.png


1564625940196.png


The continued SlyTheCoyote1 drama.

1564625140419.png


Before WintergreenWolf got suspended, a user went undercover to see what 'advice' WintergreenWolf would give about how to cuddle with a dog.
1564625248909.png

1564625312644.png

1564625334964.png

1564625351001.png
 
View attachment 869602
https://twitter.com/alu_ky/status/1155470409527152642

Excuse me, What the fuck?

I don't get the fact that every time people call these degenerates, they immediately jump to "oh, so you hate all sexualities?"
It's seriously one of the stupidest jumps in logic I have ever seen.
I hate how people like this always lump those things together. Every 'movement' should be it's own thing and handled it's own way. You can't just say "we're niggers too" and get some kind of pass. The race movement of 20th century America was a big thing sure but there were nuances. Same thing with the gay stuff. Just because you wave a flag around and call oppression it doesn't make you the same as those causes.
This argument is just childish and a typical way for idiots to trap other idiots into taking their side.

But to answer the question yes, they all are disgusting agendas.
 
I hate how people like this always lump those things together. Every 'movement' should be it's own thing and handled it's own way. You can't just say "we're niggers too" and get some kind of pass. The race movement of 20th century America was a big thing sure but there were nuances. Same thing with the gay stuff. Just because you wave a flag around and call oppression it doesn't make you the same as those causes.
This argument is just childish and a typical way for idiots to trap other idiots into taking their side.

But to answer the question yes, they all are disgusting agendas.

Agreed, and just because you're against pedophiles while being a zoophile, it doesn't give you more of a moral high ground than an actual pedo.
 
View attachment 869602
https://twitter.com/alu_ky/status/1155470409527152642

Excuse me, What the fuck?

I don't get the fact that every time people call these degenerates, they immediately jump to "oh, so you hate all sexualities?"
It's seriously one of the stupidest jumps in logic I have ever seen.

It's because there are some zoophiles and pedophiles that try to attach themselves to the LGBT+ community and believe an attack on one sexuality is an attack on all.

Why am I not surprised he's a socialist :thinking:

There are a lot of furries that are left-leaning anyways. Maybe he thinks that socialism will be tolerant of zoophiles/sexual contact with animals. Toggle also seems to want impeachment as well.
1564627112008.png

 
Agreed, and just because you're against pedophiles while being a zoophile, it doesn't give you more of a moral high ground than an actual pedo.
Admittedly I find zoos to be a little worse than pedos because at least pedos kind of make sense as far as species go.
Yeah the "at least I'm not that bad" argument is pretty stupid and nothing more than a way to deflect any guilt or blame.
 
Shit like this is why I have to watch my blood pressure.

These fucks repeat the same things over and over again. They cannot see logic. They cannot see reason. They willfully exist in a delusional world where they are oppressed minorities and somehow a goddamn dog can consent. It's not worth trying to argue with that level of stupid. You'd have a better chance of convincing a brick to write a book than it is to convince a dogfucker to stop fucking dogs. The only thing that will ever make them change is if one of their victims traumatically castrates them from pissing them off one too many times.

I just feel like it's a waste of effort to try to debate or convince a dogfucker of anything.

But it is amusing to see just how far they'll twist in order to justify their behavior.

Not liking pizza is totes the same as not liking a neckbeard raping your dog. /sneed

Is there even a way to report these people on twitter? I'd like to know if there is.
 
Is there even a way to report these people on twitter? I'd like to know if there is.
The only way I know to report them is report this account > it's something else but I'm starting to doubt it does anything. :heart-empty: I suppose people could start appealing to Twitter staff for the ability to report advocating for harm against children and animals.
 
This is one of alu_ky's followers:
View attachment 869719

age of attraction 4-15
WTF
Tf does "non-exclusive" mean? He is not only attracted to kids, he can also like adults? I mean shit, terms like "minor attracted", "non offending" and "pro contact" are already autistic and sugarcoaty, but I'm sure "non-exclusive" isn't something you'd immediately figure out what it means
View attachment 869602
https://twitter.com/alu_ky/status/1155470409527152642

Excuse me, What the fuck?

I don't get the fact that every time people call these degenerates, they immediately jump to "oh, so you hate all sexualities?"
It's seriously one of the stupidest jumps in logic I have ever seen.
Does Aluzky support incest? Being the libshit that he is I think he would.
 
Since he has confirmed he has autism. I have to wonder if his inability to socialize with human beings caused his sexual attraction to animals and his inability to process how abusive his fetish is.
I think you're onto something.
The fact that an animal or at least dogs have that 'love you unconditionally' thing it really comes off similar to that pedo thing where they think the kid is coming onto them.
 
Today, as I was using the self checkout to pay for my groceries, I heard a young lady who worked for the store express her excitement of it being closing time. She giddily expressed how she was ready to "do a happy dance" to celebrate.

It was there, a loaf of bread in hand, that I recalled what this term means to a zoo and furthermore, I realized how fucking scarred I am from this shit.

And so, as I scanned a can of beans and some new Gillettes, I began to think this awful, nightmarish chaff over when suddenly, I had a thought;

These mutants quite clearly don't understand the concept of consent, and assume it is given based on tail wagging or whatever, regardless of what science tells us about canine behavior and emotions, as well as that of other animals. Even then, they scrape together any excuse to justify their abusive actions. With this in mind, and combined with their lack of empathy and general understanding of things due to being so socially inept, as well as their generally sadistic ways, I have to the conclusion that zoophiles not only do not understand consent, they don't care for it.

They're so lost in dewbauchery and sadness that even if an animal expressed thorough negative reaction to sexual advances, zoos are simply pushed to abuse more. They're natural abusers. Rapists. That's what turns them on. You know damn well that these pricks will push, force and hurt to have their climax. The resistance just makes it all the more sexy for them. Just like how a rapist will claim their victims were asking for it via revealing clothing, or how they enjoyed because they orgasmed or were wet, a zoophile will claim it based off of spasms, tail wagging and the lack of biting.

Deep down, they know it's wrong. If they were in a courtroom they wouldn't make any attempt to escape jail time because they know they have no argument. And besides, in their minds, they've already won; they've physically and mentally damaged a living being and they got off from it, they think they're alpha. It's their fetish. That's all that matters. They just wish they didn't have to be in that courtroom in the first place.
 
Back