Nick Rekieta's Weeb Wars videos & livestreams - MULTIPLE SLURS

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Lying to the judge is the easiest way to lose credibility"

Oh, wow! I didn't know that before! I'm so enlightened, now! Thank you, Mike Dunford, I don't know how I'll ever repay you! :heart-full:

indianshedevil said:
Rekieta is not wrong.
Click to expand...

...I mean, it's a statement of opinion.

I would hope he's not wrong about a statement of opinion.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Slimy Time, indianshedevil and 2 others
ColtWalker1847 said:
Did Lemoine type this out on his blackberry while driving? The terrible grammar reads like something I would longform shitpost from my phone on the farms while taking a dump.
Click to expand...
This how I imagine LemonBitch.
1564636143313.png
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: ManateeHunter, Kosher Salt, BlehFail.451 and 11 others
Zero Day Defense said:
...I mean, it's a statement of opinion.

I would hope he's not wrong about a statement of opinion.
Click to expand...
That's because I totally agree with him.
Immaculate Ape said:
Don't you see twitter??

Ty's motions are turning the friggin' frogs gay!
Click to expand...
www.youtube.com

Gay Frogs (Alex Jones REMIX)

I DON'T LIKE EM PUTTING CHEMICALS IN THE WATER THAT TURN THE FRIGGIN FROGS GAY!Music & video editing by me. Subscribe for more remixes!Source clip: https://w...
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Zero Day Defense and Immaculate Ape
DirtyOldish_pol_tard said:
I'm pretty sure Ty was a Spartan in a former life. He has the perfect Laconic replies.
Click to expand...

It's the perfect way to respond. Look at the first screed LemonFührer sent. Several deep, seething paragraphs. He wants Ty to respond in kind. He put so much effort and passion into that email trying to piss Ty off. Likely he sat there in smug satisfaction as he read through it time and again, only for Ty to respond succinctly. I guarantee that pissed LemonFührer off further.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt, ConSluttant, In Heaven and 5 others
Oh, incidentally, I change my call. This is a permissible kind of ex parte communication and, in fact, it is even listed as a kind of ex parte communication in a Model Rule of Professional Conduct.

Rule 2.9: Ex Parte Communications

(A) A judge shall not initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications, or consider other communications made to the judge outside the presence of the parties or their lawyers, concerning a pending* or impending matter,* except as follows:

(1) When circumstances require it, ex parte communication for scheduling, administrative, or emergency purposes, which does not address substantive matters, is permitted, provided:
(a) the judge reasonably believes that no party will gain a procedural, substantive, or tactical advantage as a result of the ex parte communication; and
(b) the judge makes provision promptly to notify all other parties of the substance of the ex parte communication, and gives the parties an opportunity to respond.
Click to expand...

This communication would be an ex parte communication covered by MRPC 2.9(A)(1).

So Mike Dumbford is just fucking wrong, and this was, in fact, literally an ex parte communication.
 
  • Winner
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Evil Bunny, Clockwork Dragon, ManateeHunter and 21 others
AnOminous said:
Oh, incidentally, I change my call. This is a permissible kind of ex parte communication and, in fact, it is even listed as a kind of ex parte communication in a Model Rule of Professional Conduct.



This communication would be an ex parte communication covered by MRPC 2.9(A)(1).

So Mike Dumbford is just fucking wrong, and this was, in fact, literally an ex parte communication.
Click to expand...

The first Letter would seem a permissible ex parte submission. But the follow up with the binder full of facts? That isn't provided to the other parties. Ummm...? Yeah that's the real problematic type ex parte. He's trying to put his own case arguments and facts in front of the judges eyes exclusively.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Kosher Salt, repentance and Pixis
BoxofMonkeys said:
Fuhrers really butt hurt by Nick. ...'taking tactical direction from a fourth year attorney'...
Click to expand...
Fuhrer and lawtwitter are so mad that an attorney with "only four years of experience" is one of, if not the most followed and listened to attorneys on youtube. I mentioned on the T Greg thread, but all these jackass attorneys are showing that all their supposed experience means nothing when they don't bother reading the docs, doing due diligence in checking sources and act exceptional.

They also all happen to be garbage at running podcasts and shows. T Greg has one which no one listens. Popehat is that guy who will tell you about what he did and what he's done 10 years ago, when he's not worth shit today. They all want to jump into the public spotlight in the hope that they can break out of the attorney role because they are not going anywhere career wise. And it makes them fucking mad that a "new kid on the block" has gotten there.

Can you imagine doing criminal law for so many years and you still have to deal with gangbangers and other lowlives who ignore your advice. Or having to do these boring IP or contract disputes, never being hired by big companies who will pay you top dollar. I would want to get out of it asap. FFS, look at the clients that Casey and Lemoine have. Casey - licensed since 2002, Lemoine - 17+ years practice, and MoRon are the people they are representing, and likely not getting paid by while Ty gets Mignogna, who has 200k+ because a guy with "merely 4 years law practice" runs a good show, set a GFM up and also makes bank via live streaming. That has to fucking burn.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Annoying Thick Bitch, ManateeHunter, Kosher Salt and 14 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back