Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?


  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
In a job interview, they usually always ask about a situation that might happen. When I applied at Starbucks, they asked about "what would you do if someone threw their coffee at you." I responded with "try to keep calm, see how I could help."
Yes, but those scenarios could easily happen there. What if they asked you "what would you do if green hippo in a suit came and said in pefect english that he works for the fbi" ? that's what you're asking me, basically.

And at one point it was a dream, a thought, an idea. Leonardo, if I'm not mistaken, dream't a lot of his inventions up. ...no?
leonardo's example is true but my point still stands. he couldn't have imagined all that or have these dreams without some technical knowledge.

You can stand up for your beliefs, but your voice gets lost as a jobless neet, and not someone who has power.
so? If I had a job somebody would agree with me? All those losers you laugh at ls. com have jobs. Does this make them respected? Power? Just working would give me power? What are you smoking?

Go vote or something, write your congressman, whatever.
lol, and this would achieve - what?

And personally, I've never even had sex. The idea is mortifying to me. Eventually when I meet my ~Husbando~ and we get married...well, we'll see. :3
Lol, no. It really wasn't. THEN EXPLAIN TO ME. MAKE ME UNDERSTAND.
I'm sorry, but your article is your word. Give me hard proof.
your posts alone are proof. somebody who asks what would they need a wife for can't understand this. why do you even mention a husband? you heard this on tv? you have no concept of why people need partners.
 
Still. According to the current studies, the population of Earth is about 7 billion. Assume that gender is roughly divided 50/50. That's 3.5 billion females.

Putting aside the fact that there's no way you could have studied all 20,000 women without generalising, you think that 20,000 out of 3.5 Billion Women is a good sample?
these imbecilic questions are based on several idiotic ideas

1. that every woman is a special snowflake
2. that i said what i say about all women, not just western women

20,000 is more than enough of a sample. we're not special snowflakes. if 20,000 people are like x and not a single like y it means that there are few or none y's
 
What do you mean by know them? i obviously can't know all 20,000 well but it includes so many of them, yes, from those i was in a relationship with to just some i talked to a bit.
Even if it was just talking a bit, if you met a new girl every day, it'd take around 54 years. Also, that's up quite a bit from what you quoted me a while back.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
these imbecilic questions are based on several idiotic ideas

1. that every woman is a special snowflake
2. that i said what i say about all women, not just western women

20,000 is more than enough of a sample. we're not special snowflakes. if 20,000 people are like x and not a single like y it means that there are few or none y's

See, I told you you were bad at maths!
 
Except you kinda didn't. You just said 'because it's tradition,' but that's not a reason. It's not a concrete reason for anyone to get slighted by it, and I explained why.
and i explained why it is. marriage is a traditional institution between a man and a woman mostly designed for having kids. the only historically certain example of a gay marriage was nero castrating a guy so he could marry him. if you can't acknowledge this we should just agree to disagree.

See, I told you you were bad at maths!
and you are bad at having a brain. women are cattle. if you meet one in some surroundings you've met them all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
yes. saying something that is true.
My altered variation takes actual nature of the incel male in Eastern Europe in account, of which I am an expert. I have known well over 20,000 incel men in Eastern Europe, which is more than enough of a sample size to know exactly how their mind operates. You have no proof to contradict this and if you even try you are insane &/or a troll.
 
nope, just that women are like cattle - subservient en masse

Except that if they were so subservient, you'd be able to hold onto a girlfriend. But you can't. Doesn't that kinda...cancel out the subservience thing?

And if women ARE subservient, how much of a pathetic excuse for a man must you be that not even subservient slaves want you?


in fact, i am an expert on a lot of things, simply because i still retained my brain and am not brainwashed by liberalism.

"I am an expert on a lot of things"
"HOW DO I GET A GIRLFRIEND!?"
 
Except that if they were so subservient, you'd be able to hold onto a girlfriend.
as usual, you don't understand. they are subservient to whatever's most popular. today's women like liberalism because that's what's popular. but it seems that more intelligent women are becoming muslims because that's gonna big the next power in the west.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back