Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Scotsman said:
View attachment 872092

This woman is completely off her tits.
Click to expand...

Translation: "White folks: Everyone who belongs to a race or ethnicity other than yours is untrustworthy and is constantly betraying you behind your back. Every single damn one of them is contemptible.

"By the way, you're the racist."
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Vault Boy, Lizard Pope and 20 others
Marissa Moira said:
It's going to cause every remaining pop-culture franchise like The Dark Crystal to be made into anti-trump propaganda.
Click to expand...

From a purely entertainment perspective Trump losing might be the preferable outcome. We'd have to suffer a few months of gloating and peacocking sure but.. I have a feeling, come a 2020 Trump loss or Trump leaving office in 2024 we'll be witness to a wave of life ruining meltdowns and suicides decimating the blue checkmark brigade as they lose their reason for being.

The likes of Bob, Noah and thousands of actual "somebodies" have made it their lifes work to #RESIST a four to eight year president. Sure their jobs are dead ends, they're living on borrowed time as their lives spiral down the drain but gosh darnit, no time to think about any of that, we have to oppose orange Hitler!

No matter what happens, the peanut gallery wins. That said, Trump II: The trumpening takes my preference, we'll get the 2024 existential crisis either way and there's no way I want to miss out on that level 2 salt from a reelection.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Vault Boy, PantsOfDesire and 12 others
Ruin said:
Depending on the poll Trump's approval rating is between 39 snd 46%. Omar's is 19% and AOC's is 25%. I know sjw types are bad at maths but really?
Click to expand...
I can't believe it either, but they actually managed to find a poll where these four get higher approval ratings than Trump. This is stupid, here you have an Economist/YouGov poll where Trump's at -11 and Omar's -6, but right next to it there's an Emerson poll which has Trump at -2 and Omar at -21. Just a few days apart. How am I supposed to believe these polls measure anything even approximating reality?
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Vault Boy, AGreatDipAtAFairPrice, Vorhtbame and 11 others
Some classic derangement for you all.

Screen Shot 2019-08-02 at 4.16.58 PM.png

truthout.org

When Trump Calls People "Filth," He's Laying Groundwork for Genocide

Mass killing does not happen instantly. It needs the sort of ideological scaffolding that Trump is laying down.
truthout.org truthout.org

He's literally going to kill all non-whites! We're not fearmongering or taking words out of context at all!

Side-note: Do any words more elegantly express that the following diatribe is devoid of all worth than "OP-ED | RACIAL JUSTICE"?
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
  • Winner
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Exterminate Leftists, Vault Boy and 13 others
MementoMalum said:
Some classic derangement for you all.

View attachment 872348
truthout.org

When Trump Calls People "Filth," He's Laying Groundwork for Genocide

Mass killing does not happen instantly. It needs the sort of ideological scaffolding that Trump is laying down.
truthout.org truthout.org

He's literally going to kill all non-whites! We're not fearmongering or taking words out of context at all!

Side-note: Do any words more elegantly express that the following diatribe is devoid of all worth than "OP-ED | RACIAL JUSTICE"?
Click to expand...
Who did Trump call filth?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: greengrilledcheese, Kinkshamer and rocknrollmartian
MementoMalum said:
He's literally going to kill all non-whites! We're not fearmongering or taking words out of context at all!

Side-note: Do any words more elegantly express that the following diatribe is devoid of all worth than "OP-ED | RACIAL JUSTICE"?
Click to expand...
Aside from the obvious bullshit, I can't find an example of Trump using the word "filth" in this context, never mind actually calling people that. The only thing I found is an interview where it's Tucker Carlson who uses the word. Even the headline consists solely of lies.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Exterminate Leftists, Vault Boy and 7 others
Corbin Dallas Multipass said:
Who did Trump call filth?
Click to expand...

As far as I can tell, there was an interview with Tucker Carlson, where Carlson said: "There's no graffiti. No one going to bathroom on the street. You don't see junkies. Very different from our city.. some of our cities, but New York City, San Francisco, Los Angeles - they've got a major problem with filth. Why is that?"

Trump did not say "filth" but the media has run with it, making it appear that he did. Also, you note that Carlson did not refer to people as filth, but to the trash littering the streets.

Fake news all around.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Exterminate Leftists, Vault Boy and 13 others
MementoMalum said:
As far as I can tell, there was an interview with Tucker Carlson, where Carlson said: "There's no graffiti. No one going to bathroom on the street. You don't see junkies. Very different from our city.. some of our cities, but New York City, San Francisco, Los Angeles - they've got a major problem with filth. Why is that?"

Trump did not say "filth" but the media has run with it, making it appear that he did. Also, you note that Carlson did not refer to people as filth, but to the trash littering the streets.

Fake news all around.
Click to expand...
If Trump said anything exceptional, it's that the homeless/trash problem in major cities is something that started two years ago. Or did the article take him out of context, did he mean he started looking at ways to fix it two years ago?
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Kinkshamer
ProgKing of the North said:
If Trump said anything exceptional, it's that the homeless/trash problem in major cities is something that started two years ago. Or did the article take him out of context, did he mean he started looking at ways to fix it two years ago?
Click to expand...
I'll give you three guesses and the first two don't count.
 
  • Feels
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Vault Boy, greengrilledcheese, Kinkshamer and 1 other person
Barnard said:
How am I supposed to believe these polls measure anything even approximating reality?
Click to expand...
Publicly released polls are weapons and that's all they are.

One can't generally see the results of private polls, but sometimes one can make qualitative inferences by observing the public behavior of those commissioning them. Especially when they release obviously weaponized public polls.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Vault Boy, BR55 and 5 others
AprilRains said:
Publicly released polls are weapons and that's all they are.

One can't generally see the results of private polls, but sometimes one can make qualitative inferences by observing the public behavior of those commissioning them. Especially when they release obviously weaponized public polls.
Click to expand...
Polls on a large, country wide scale are a massive tool. Firstly, in order to conduct an TRUE, honest, unbiased, COMPLETE "heartbeat of the country" opinion poll, the cost and time required would be insane. So instead we have these wonderful polls that result in "Hillary favored to win the election by 90%" type shindigs, because they consist of MAYBE 2-5K people, in specific districts of specific states. No shit Hillary has a 80 point spread according to the latest and greatest public opinion poll....that just happened to be conducted in San Francisco. NEVER trust an opinion poll or statistics that are based on them, especially when the fine print of who/what/when/where the poll took place is so well hidden all the time.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Vault Boy, Lizard Pope and 10 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back