Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

[Ryker]

in this case, modern way of thinking and behavior.

?? You can't just use terminology that has a socio-cultural meaning in such a piecemeal fashion, man. It's loaded and you don't know the history of the concept. Do you want me to explain it to you?

 

[SpessCaptain]

?? You can't just use terminology that has a socio-cultural meaning in such a piecemeal fashion, man. It's loaded and you don't know the history of the concept. Do you want me to explain it to you?

I aplogise for sounding a bit brash, but I think Holden wouldn't be able to understand you - could you possibly translate to grunts for him?
Also you're pretty much on the money about Holden's pseudo-intelligence.

 

[Holy wait what?]

they also married at 18 and didn't have 8 month long relationships with no sex.

http://www.history.com/news/history-lists/5-things-victorian-women-didnt-do-much

At the end of the 18th century, the average age of first marriage was 28 years old for men and 26 years old for women.

That's just 200 years ago...

http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/OLD-ENGLISH/2005-05/1116407949

in 1600 the average age at first marriage was about 28 (for men) and 25-26 (for women). It fell steadily over the next two centuries, though by the 1830s it was still as high as 25-26 (men) and 24 (women).

(Incidentally, this drop in the age at which people married was a major factor in the population explosion of the 18C and 19C, since it meant that most women were married for slightly longer and therefore bore one or two more children. Another was the increasing proportion of women who married - in the 16th and 17th century as many as a quarter never married, but by the 19th century the proportion marrying had risen, thus further increasing the number of births).

That's 400 years ago...

What you claim was unusual, not the norm. Don't you just hate it when someone can do just a little research and show your claim to be outright bullshit?

article explains it very well. femifascist policies like welfare, AA, worthless jobs for women, decriminalization of adultery etc make providers useless and seducer scum desired by women.

Since 400 years ago roughly a quarter of women didn't marry, who provided for them?

The reality is that they worked and provided for themselves... hell, back then EVERYONE worked and provided for themselves. I guess that 400 years ago providers were useless and seducers were all that were wanted.

Or you're wrong...

husbands? modern men no longer marry.

Oh?

Oh dear... more people getting married now than there were 150 years ago.

again, would you marry a man you've never seen if he is a provider? not me, some other man.

You've already admitted that you would MAYBE marry a woman you've never seen... so your question is truly pointless.

And again, 400 years ago a QUARTER of women DID NOT MARRY. You are pining for something that is a fairly modern phenomenon, not something that happened back in all those "sane" societies you keep on harping about.

 

[RequiredName]

Cretinous, excremental pilot fish @Holden, stop villainizing the victims of misandry by fueling your half-baked delusions. Sincerely, people who have a better chance of hooking up with your mom than you do.

 

[SpessCaptain]

Hah you can actually see where WWI and WWII started and ended in the graph.

But seriously Holden, you're dumbass claims is like a dude finding a particular website among millions that claims that all of the rest is false.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

?? You can't just use terminology that has a socio-cultural meaning in such a piecemeal fashion, man. It's loaded and you don't know the history of the concept. Do you want me to explain it to you?

I do know that modernism has various meanings. In this case
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/modernism
1.modern character, tendencies, or values; adherence to or sympathy with what is modern.

 

[CatParty]

I do know that modernism has various meanings. In this case
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/modernism
1.modern character, tendencies, or values; adherence to or sympathy with what is modern.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/involuntary_celibacy

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

Since 400 years ago roughly a quarter of women didn't marry, who provided for them?

The reality is that they worked and provided for themselves... hell, back then EVERYONE worked and provided for themselves. I guess that 400 years ago providers were useless and seducers were all that were wanted.

Is there any point in going further? You are completely ignorant of basic history. Are you seriously claiming that seduction was used 400 years ago? And since you make the claim that a quarter of them didn't could you provide evidence? This is a claim you're making about 17th century. How do you know?

as for your graph, you're an idiot. you never took into the account, if your stupid indoctrinated head already can't that these women use their husbands as cash cows, that there were fewer people in the 19th century?

 

[Ryker]

There is an immense difference between using the term "modern" and "modernism". You are conflating the two. One is a commonplace and the other has a very specific meaning. Your chosen definition is so far off the mark that it is not funny. Please don't use terms that you don't have a full understanding of....

 

[RequiredName]

I do know that modernism has various meanings. In this case
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/modernism
1.modern character, tendencies, or values; adherence to or sympathy with what is modern.

Quoting the dictionary doesn't mean you understand it, just like you communicate with us all the time but you understand nothing about how to relate to other people.

Also, try some of THESE and also take THIS then go shove your hand up your arse.

 

[Holy wait what?]

Hah you can actually see where WWI and WWII started and ended in the graph.

Yup... peaks at the start of each war, drops massively during, spikes again at the end, then drops back down.

I also notice that, despite forms of welfare starting back in the 30's, marriage kept on going... and even full on welfare state in the 50's did nothing to stop it. Heck, even women's sufferage before WWI did fuck all to stop it. It's almost like historical records show Fuckbot to be a complete moron...

 

[CatParty]

Is there any point in going further? You are completely ignorant of basic history. Are you seriously claiming that seduction was used 400 years ago? And since you make the claim that a quarter of them didn't could you provide evidence? This is a claim you're making about 17th century. How do you know?

as for your graph, you're an idiot. you never took into the account, if your stupid indoctrinated head already can't that these women use their husbands as cash cows, that there were fewer people in the 19th century?

is that why you mad? cause you got no money? you just lolcow instead of cash cow?

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

Cretinous, excremental pilot fish @Holden, stop villainizing the victims of misandry .

stop trolling
cat - interesting. there is constant battle to bring it back. but i predicted that the liberals there will not allow this.

 

[Cubanodun]

I do know that modernism has various meanings. In this case
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/modernism
1.modern character, tendencies, or values; adherence to or sympathy with what is modern.

so @Holden any progress in the rape thing? remember IS ILLEGAL AND YOU WILL GOING TO JAIL

also can you give me the specs of your pc? i want to see if you can run Team fortress 2

 

[CatParty]

stop trolling
cat - interesting. there is constant battle to bring it back. but i predicted that the liberals there will not allow this.

what if you got the gamergate guys to help you. i know a lot of them consider themself incels

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

Yup... peaks at the start of each war, drops massively during, spikes again at the end, then drops back down.

I also notice that, despite forms of welfare starting back in the 30's, marriage kept on going... and even full on welfare state in the 50's did nothing to stop it. Heck, even women's sufferage before WWI did fuck all to stop it.

it takes feminism time to destroy a society. first it had to destroy the people. west didn't have its generation of sluts until 1960.

what if you got the gamergate guys to help you. i know a lot of them consider themself incels

i would, if i knew how.

is that why you mad? cause you got no money?

i could have money if i worked, but it would go nowhere.

Quoting the dictionary doesn't mean you understand it,

make arguments, not senseless claims

 

[Holy wait what?]

Is there any point in going further? You are completely ignorant of basic history. Are you seriously claiming that seduction was used 400 years ago? And since you make the claim that a quarter of them didn't could you provide evidence? This is a claim you're making about 17th century. How do you know?

http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/OLD-ENGLISH/2005-05/1116407949

derived from 'English Population History from Family Reconstitution 1580-1837', EA Wrigley, RS Davies, JE Oppen, RS Schofield (Cambridge, 1997)

Oh fucking well look... I provided fucking evidence and you ignored it! (and you're the one claiming it's either Provider or Seducer... so you need to provide evidence for that claim AND need to account for what I've just provided you with.)

as for your graph, you're an idiot. you never took into the account, if your stupid indoctrinated head already can't that these women use their husbands as cash cows, that there were fewer people in the 19th century?

And? How does that make the number of people getting married zero, as you claimed?

Honestly, you simply cannot ever accept that you're wrong, can you?

 

[SpessCaptain]

[Insert Holden Post where he could of multiquote but didn't]

You know what? You have no sense of internet manners.

So how about your father?

 

[Cubanodun]

i would, if i knew how.

this is a valid question @Holden are you pro or anti gamergate?

 

[Holy wait what?]

Quoting the dictionary doesn't mean you understand it, just like you communicate with us all the time but you understand nothing about how to relate to other people.

Also, try some of THESE and also take THIS then go shove your hand up your arse.

@Holden still hasn't been able to state what a relationship is in his own words... all he can do is quote what others have said, including quite a few Liberal Western Women, who he insists can't understand it.

He never did realise just how badly he spanked himself there...