- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
He has to be joking. He can't think people would take that seriously, can he? Even he's not that out of touch with how people see him, is he?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would like for us to not have to make decisions that solve nothing but make people feel better in order to appease a reactionary public. However that's not the world we live in.So in one week we have gone from, in this thread, "the left is doomed due to their radicalization" to "we have to make concessions and impliment gun control now or we will lose!".
The grim reality of the situation is there will be more mass shootings in the future, and this is one of the reasons I think in the long term the right wing is screwed. Nothing ever goes back, it just becomes the new taboo, and what was once a normal opinion becomes reactionary.
These are concessions, not compromises: every one given out is one out that will not be ever undone short of the supreme court saying so.
That link gave me cancer.
If you're going to use a tweet to make a point embed a screenshot:
View attachment 879871
Then embed the link after it.
It's not rocket science, and it makes your posts more readable. If you're going to be autistic, at least make it easy on people to see what you are REEEEEing about.
Also, is your main issue with Trump guns or the Jews? You said you won't vote for Trump because he made a conciliatory remark about gun control after a tragedy, then spent 3 pages raving about the Protocols of Zion. I'm not a huge fan of Israel either, but you're not helping your cause with your behavior.
I would like for us to not have to make decisions that solve nothing but make people feel better in order to appease a reactionary public. However that's not the world we live in.
You should be able to expect voting age adults to recognize rational, well thought out responses, including sometimes doing nothing. And in theory you can. But in practice you can't.
There is an article about why making emotionally reactive policy in response to a tragedy or attack after each one. Every one is welcomed and cheered for its sagacity by a public that has cooled off enough to understand the words. Then the exact same calls for reactive policy that achieves nothing and wouldn’t have stopped the attack happens in the wake of the next one.I would like for us to not have to make decisions that solve nothing but make people feel better in order to appease a reactionary public. However that's not the world we live in.
You should be able to expect voting age adults to recognize rational, well thought out responses, including sometimes doing nothing. And in theory you can. But in practice you can't.
![]()
![]()
Don't eat a big dinner before your workout, Michael.
Good thing im a centristView attachment 879926
Source: https://m.facebook.com/evan.sayet/posts/10162048101480161
Be most excellent to each other now.
What are you conservatives conserving again?
What the fuck is the 40 bucks a month for? Or maybe I should ask what the fuck the $2,245 was for if I am going to be stuck with a 40 dollar monthly fee.
You're right, keep acting like a predictable hothead, keep losing because you're mentally incapable of thinking more than a step ahead. Then wonder why you've lost every battle over the past 50 years and why a liberal is currently the only thing standing between you and complete annihilation.
I was happy to hear Nancy Pelosi was resisting calls to cancel the end of the August recess and return early to pass new gun control.There is an article about why making emotionally reactive policy in response to a tragedy or attack after each one. Every one is welcomed and cheered for its sagacity by a public that has cooled off enough to understand the words. Then the exact same calls for reactive policy that achieves nothing and wouldn’t have stopped the attack happens in the wake of the next one.
Shit’s practically a joke now but it keeps happening. Maybe this time the house-senate split will keep anything from being done long enough for it to no longer be hot and controversial. I’m not holding my breath though.
Conservatives lose every battle because they bend over backwards for the left. Like all the cucks in this thread ready to give up their rights just because daddy Donald says it's OK now.
Lol, what rights are you even talking about?
Calm down bro.1st and 2nd amendment. But you're the guy that didn't know the JIDF was a thing so I guess we have to spoon feed you everything. For the pink panther you are a terrible detective.
1st and 2nd amendment. But you're the guy that didn't know the JIDF was a thing so I guess we have to spoon feed you everything. For the pink panther you are a terrible detective.
This is why the school system sucks right now. We have incompetent assholes who don’t take five minutes out of their time to listen to the potential dangers they might achieve.
I'm always curious as to how Democrats think a forced confiscation on guns would go. There are plenty of liberal judges and police commissioners but statistically rank and file police officers and enlisted men and women tend to not be very friendly to leftist causes.
I want politics to be boring again
Seriously though, why the hell does anyone don’t can’t see AT&T selling off CNN in a effort to prevent TDS from damaging their profits and pissing off their shareholders? I know it’s wishful thinking, but still, what would they lose if they got rid of CNN and sold it to someone else that makes bigger profits with it?