Explanation

Status
Not open for further replies.
BoingoTango said:
Literally every single point you mentioned could be argued in favor of little einstein porn you fucking faggot. It isn't different just because they put an anime artstyle over it. And of COURSE they (you) are going to say they don't like real children.

People, if we are going after child porn, let's go after all of it.
Click to expand...
First of all, loli isn't real. Real CP should be banned, and the people who watch it arrested, but loli is pure fiction. As such, unlike CP, loli doesn't hurt anyone. Can it be offensive? Yeah. Can it be gross? Yeah. But so what? We don't ban other fetishes because they're offensive or gross; take a look a vore, scat, etc. They're all allowed to exist, especially in a fictional form because they don't hurt anyone. How is loli different?
The best thing i've seen against it is the argument it encourages paedophilia, but that to is a shallow argument. How many paedophiles have been convicted have looked at loli before committing either a real world offensive or get a hold the real stuff? I would think if you're going to commit a real world offense, you wouldn't care much for the fake stuff.
As long as you don't hurt anyone, directly or indirectly (indirectly by viewing real CP, supporting the child abusers) I see no reason why that should be bad, morally or legally.
Another thing is that there is worse content that is allowed to exist on reddit. Look up a list of quarantined subreddits one day. There is horse porn in which people discuss how to break into their friends stables to practically rape their animals to a necrophila sub, where people jerk off to stuff like naked beheaded girls, dead bodies, etc, which is obviously disrespectful to the dead and could be real world emotional harm to the dead people's families. Why is that shit allowed on reddit, albeit under quarantine, but not loli? Something that hurts no one and encourages no illegal actions.
Even in the real world books like lolita are allowed to exist with relative praise despite containing sexual situations between a (fictional) 12 year old girl and her father. Are books suddenly more of an art form then drawings? You may argue "well Lolita has significant value as art, loli does not." First of all, since art is subjective, how can you determine that? Second of all if a piece of loli artwork put some serious effort into being artistic do you think it would get a free pass? Honestly it probably wouldn't.
There are even photographers like Sally Mann who "is an American photographer, best known for her large black-and-white photographs—at first of her young children" ~ wikipedia. Don't worry, according to United States Criminal Code: Title 18, 1466A section B2B what she does is okay. So according to US law feel free to look at her artwork of acually naked children because "it posses artistic value" meanwhile imaginary naked children? Oh no now THAT'S illegal.
Sorry for the long argument, and while I don't want to be condescending but other people haven't cared about what i've said before and I doubt this time will be any different.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Samoyed, Feline Supremacist, Michaelsoft and 3 others
Cool profile page.
2019-08-12 02.32.27 www.facebook.com 4ceb468a61e9.png
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: dunbrine47, Eryngium, Autismo Pinochet and 1 other person
Eryngium said:
First of all, loli isn't real. Real CP should be banned, and the people who watch it arrested, but loli is pure fiction. As such, unlike CP, loli doesn't hurt anyone. Can it be offensive? Yeah. Can it be gross? Yeah. But so what? We don't ban other fetishes because they're offensive or gross; take a look a vore, scat, etc. They're all allowed to exist, especially in a fictional form because they don't hurt anyone. How is loli different?
The best thing i've seen against it is the argument it encourages paedophilia, but that to is a shallow argument. How many paedophiles have been convicted have looked at loli before committing either a real world offensive or get a hold the real stuff? I would think if you're going to commit a real world offense, you wouldn't care much for the fake stuff.
As long as you don't hurt anyone, directly or indirectly (indirectly by viewing real CP, supporting the child abusers) I see no reason why that should be bad, morally or legally.
Another thing is that there is worse content that is allowed to exist on reddit. Look up a list of quarantined subreddits one day. There is horse porn in which people discuss how to break into their friends stables to practically rape their animals to a necrophila sub, where people jerk off to stuff like naked beheaded girls, dead bodies, etc, which is obviously disrespectful to the dead and could be real world emotional harm to the dead people's families. Why is that shit allowed on reddit, albeit under quarantine, but not loli? Something that hurts no one and encourages no illegal actions.
Even in the real world books like lolita are allowed to exist with relative praise despite containing sexual situations between a (fictional) 12 year old girl and her father. Are books suddenly more of an art form then drawings? You may argue "well Lolita has significant value as art, loli does not." First of all, since art is subjective, how can you determine that? Second of all if a piece of loli artwork put some serious effort into being artistic do you think it would get a free pass? Honestly it probably wouldn't.
There are even photographers like Sally Mann who "is an American photographer, best known for her large black-and-white photographs—at first of her young children" ~ wikipedia. Don't worry, according to United States Criminal Code: Title 18, 1466A section B2B what she does is okay. So according to US law feel free to look at her artwork of acually naked children because "it posses artistic value" meanwhile imaginary naked children? Oh no now THAT'S illegal.
Sorry for the long argument, and while I don't want to be condescending but other people haven't cared about what i've said before and I doubt this time will be any different.
Click to expand...


I literally can't believe you found copypasta defending loli so fast. Good work
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Ozma (ZeTrannyJanny), Bunny Tracks, Michaelsoft and 2 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back