Google Insider Turns Over 950 Pages Of Docs And Laptop To DOJ

A former Google insider claiming the company created algorithms to hide its political bias within artificial intelligence platforms – in effect targeting particular words, phrases and contexts to promote, alter, reference or manipulate perceptions of Internet content – delivered roughly 950 pages of documents to the Department of Justice’s Antitrust division Friday.

The former Google insider, who has already spoken in to the nonprofit organization Project Veritas, met with SaraACarter.com on several occasions last week. He was interviewed in silhouette, to conceal his identity, in group’s latest film, which they say exposes bias inside the social media platform.

Several weeks prior, the insider mailed a laptop to the DOJ containing the same information delivered on Friday, they said. The former insider is choosing to remain anonymous until Project Verita’s James O’Keefe reveals his identity tomorrow (Wednesday).

He told this reporter on his recent trip to Washington D.C. that the documents he turned over to the Justice Department will provide proof that Google has been manipulating the algorithms and the evidence of how it was done, the insider said.

Google CEO Sundar Pichai told the House Judiciary Committee in December, 2018, that the search engine was not biased against conservatives. Pichai explained what algorithm’s are said Google’s algorithm was not offensive to conservatives because its artificial intelligence does not operate in that manner. He told lawmakers, “things like relevance, freshness, popularity, how other people are using it” are what drives the search results. Pichai said even if his programmers were anti-Republican, the process is so intricate that the artificial intelligence could not be manipulated and it was to complicated to train the algorithm to fit their bias.

Google did not immediately respond for comment on the insider’s claims, however, this story will be updated if comment is provided.

The insider says Google is aware most people are unaware or not knowledgeable about these advanced IT systems and therefore unable to determine who is telling the truth.

“I honestly think that a free market can fix this issue,” he told this reporter at a meeting in Washington D.C. “The issue is that the free market has been distorted and what’s happened is that the distortion is so grotesque and the engineering is so repulsive, all we need to do is just expose what’s going on. People can hear that it is bad but that can be bias. But when they see what Google has actually written with the documents, this will actually be taught in universities of what totalitarian states can do with this type of capability.”

“It will be so revolting that it doesn’t matter what the solution is, a solution will just form as a reaction to this manipulation they have done,” the Google insider said.

He said he’s asked himself many times if he’s overreacting “and every time I simply look back at the documents and realize that I am not.”

“It’s that bad,” he said. “Disclosing Google’s own words to the American public is something I am, must do, if I am to consider myself a good person. The world that google is building is not a place I, or you or our children want to live in.”

⚡TOMORROW: Our ML Fairness Google insider comes out of the shadows.
AND: OVER A THOUSAND of pages of internal documents are released.
Google might take this new video down.
Sign up for our video list NOW — so you don't miss our latest on Google: https://t.co/dt1eVMYB71 pic.twitter.com/psyf36DTZs
— James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) August 13, 2019
Another Google insider, who has come forward already, told O’Keefe and other media outlets recently that it is the programers at Google who use the algorithms to manipulate the information to advance its leftist agenda.

Greg Coppola, a software engineer, told Project Veritas that he doesn’t “have a smoking gun.”

However, “I’ve just been coding since I was ten, I have a Ph.D., I have five years of experience at Google, and I just know how algorithms are. They don’t write themselves. We write them to make them do what we want them to do.”

“I look at Search and I look at Google News, and I see what it’s doing,” he said. “I see Google executives go to Congress and say … that it’s not political, and I’m just so sure that that’s not true.”

Department of Justice officials declined to comment on the document dump.
But SaraACarter.com has reviewed the documents and obtained proof from the Google insider that the documents were delivered to the DOJ.
The unnamed Google insider first spoke to O’Keefe’s Project Veritas. O’Keefe has been criticized by the left for outing the political bias of executives and employees of Google and other social media companies.

In the nonprofits most recent video, Project Veritas uses their undercover techniques to get Google employees to talk openly about their disdain for Trump and how their artificial intelligence operates.

Jenn Gennai, who heads Google’s Responsible Innovation Team, did not know she was being filmed by O’Keefe’s group. She told the undercover journalist that “the reason we launched our AI principals is because we’re not putting our line in the sand. They were not saying what’s fair and what’s equitable so we’re like, well we’re a big company, we’re going to say it.”

The internal Google documents are available here.
 
Ok, here's a torrent for the Everything.zip.

@The 8 of Spades what's with the two different "high user block rate" sections? Is it made clear if it means these sites in the results end up blocked by users at a high rate, or that these sites were in high use and therefore needed to be blocked?

I haven't found anything specific yet, but my assumption is that those results are blocked from appearing naturally unless users go out of their way to specifically view things from those site. Based on what I do know of Google's culture (had a few friends who worked for them before they lost their minds) that seems the most likely to me. Of course, I could be completely wrong here and if I am someone will likely correct me.
 

Attachments

Ok, here's a torrent for the Everything.zip.



I haven't found anything specific yet, but my assumption is that those results are blocked from appearing naturally unless users go out of their way to specifically view things from those site. Based on what I do know of Google's culture (had a few friends who worked for them before they lost their minds) that seems the most likely to me. Of course, I could be completely wrong here and if I am someone will likely correct me.

Thank you! I will be seeding this on my home servers once it's done downloading.
 
Good idea, will post torrent file shortly.

Also, yeah totally no political bias here guys, you're totally mistaken!!

**news black list sites for google now.txt**
but what about unassumingvenusaur.tumblr.com/ being on that list?
Turns out it's a gay ROM hack site for Fire Emblem games, but it's big enough to be on google's shit list!
 
For example, content that characterizes Israeli policies towards Palestinians as “racist” or “apartheid-like” is considered “hate speech” by the ADL, as is accusing Israel of war crimes or attempted ethnic cleansing. The ADL has even described explicitly Jewish organizations that are critical of Israel’s government as being “anti-Semitic.”
...
Of course she's Jewish, as are her funders, Craig Newmark and frequent Soros-collaborator Pierre Omidyar.

Stop noticing things, goy. We all love Israel here on this New Zealand agriculturalist forum.
 
You mean Google has been using their nearly God-like power to attempt to shift society in the direction they wish it to go?!

"Don't be" something something.

The internal corporate culture also sounds like a fucking nightmare of social cliques more akin to middle school then a business. It was inevitable there would be counter revolutionaries.

This is what happens when women competely control the social climates of businesses. Which they mostly do, these days. And definitely do in Silicon Valley.

Gosh, it's almost like men and women keep each other's worst impulses in check and that things go to shit when things are unbalanced.
 
This is what happens when women competely control the social climates of businesses. Which they mostly do, these days. And definitely do in Silicon Valley.

Here, i'll back up your statement with some docs.

"We can’t take our hands
off the steering wheel.

In rejecting the myth of neutral data, we are committing to be more conscious and conscientious." -
- lovejoy@ for Google
 

Attachments

Gather round, boys and girls It's time to talk about how Google intentionally made itself vulnerable to AI warfare. Here's my cursory analysis of the @Project_Veritas Google leak. Get the popcorn and hide your TensorFlow, it's about to get ridiculous...
 
Fuck it. I'm just going to believe every insane conspiracy theory until disproven. Fucking multidimensional shadow reptilians running nasa from their fucking moonbase shooting radio waves into my tooth fillings! THEY'RE TURNING THE FROGS GAY! ARGHGHGHGH

OK maybe not.
 
But there's some real curveballs in there too, such as these gems:

colgate on penis
Apply Massage Vaseline on Your P.e.n.i.s
massage toothpaste on p.en.is after doing your married life will change


I'm going to need to know the deep lore on this.
This. What the fuck is the lore on toothpaste and penis? I have some Colgate, is this something I want to do?
 
Not in Hiring Practices yet, but i did find this gem:
The back and forth about someone wanting to share this in their language is funnier since they're discussing the deeper meaning of the beans since someone doesn't get it
 

Attachments

Not in Hiring Practices yet, but i did find this gem:

Cute analogy but it starts from the faulty presumption that having a diverse workforce is automatically better than having an equally skilled non-diverse workforce.

It’s also hilarious because while their workforce is diverse in terms of race it’s not diverse in terms of thought, which is the main benefit of having diversity in the workplace in general. What’s the the point of having a workforce that is 100% progressive? It’s because Google doesn’t actually care about diversity.
 
Back