Where I post all my TTS threads for you to laugh at (Null said it was OK! No ban plz)

[Easterling]

he died doing what he loved, shitting up this forum.

 

[The Pink Panther]

I'm almost positive that he's a teenager or at most a college student. He seemed very immature, and clearly picked up most of his talking points from someone else.

In the Twilight Zone reboot thread, he said he has a wife that's a self-considered feminist....so...perspective?

So I assume he's at least in his late 20's/early 30's.

 

[It's HK-47]

Well that was a weird ride.

 

[Basil II]

ALLAH BURN THOSE WHO CRITICIZE @Corbin Dallas Multipass (PBUH) لقد أعطى الشهيد حياته لله

 

[uncleShitHeel]

Wtf am I reading?

Someone should have just halal'd OP.

 

[X Prime]

In the Twilight Zone reboot thread, he said he has a wife that's a self-considered feminist....so...perspective?

Posting on the Farms as relationship therapy is a bold strategy, but it didn't work out for him for long.

 

[The Pink Panther]

Posting on the Farms as relationship therapy is a bold strategy, but it didn't work out for him for long.

Well it wasn't relationship therapy, he was using the "even my "blank" who fits into this extreme that they are pandering for did not like this".

 

[Strelok]

I was thinking, as a idea for poll tribunals, having 2 users be polled at the same time instead would be a bit cooler. Like keep one user and ban the other. It would be a fun game that enforces that the farms have a purpose of having fun. Self-esteem issues may arise if a sensitive member gets picked, but this'll help them to overcome it if they do care very much about it.
Of course, this will only apply to users who are going to be banned or about to be banned.

@Wildchild vs @autisticdragonkin

 

[AnOminous]

I was thinking, as a idea for poll tribunals, having 2 users be polled at the same time instead would be a bit cooler. Like keep one user and ban the other. It would be a fun game that enforces that the farms have a purpose of having fun. Self-esteem issues may arise if a sensitive member gets picked, but this'll help them to overcome it if they do care very much about it.
Of course, this will only apply to users who are going to be banned or about to be banned.

Make it a challenge. If a user wants another banned, they can nominate them for a ban, but then, there's a deathmatch poll between them and whoever loses gets banned. The other guy has to accept the deathmatch though so you couldn't have just one popular dude going around banning everyone.

 

[Vince McMahon]

Make it a challenge. If a user wants another banned, they can nominate them for a ban, but then, there's a deathmatch poll between them and whoever loses gets banned. The other guy has to accept the deathmatch though so you couldn't have just one popular dude going around banning everyone.

The only weapon allowed - fishes, to slap one another in the face with until someone relents.

 

[ProgKing of the North]

Pressing F for our fallen comrade

 

[AprilRains]

Make it a challenge. If a user wants another banned, they can nominate them for a ban, but then, there's a deathmatch poll between them and whoever loses gets banned. The other guy has to accept the deathmatch though so you couldn't have just one popular dude going around banning everyone.

BUILD A DOME​

 

[UQ 770]

Make it a challenge. If a user wants another banned, they can nominate them for a ban, but then, there's a deathmatch poll between them and whoever loses gets banned. The other guy has to accept the deathmatch though so you couldn't have just one popular dude going around banning everyone.

This sounds rather similar to some 17th and 18th century dueling laws. I'm all for this.

 

[Foghot]

8/14 nevar 4get

 

[Gingervitis]

Make it a challenge. If a user wants another banned, they can nominate them for a ban, but then, there's a deathmatch poll between them and whoever loses gets banned. The other guy has to accept the deathmatch though so you couldn't have just one popular dude going around banning everyone.

This except I agree unironically.

 

[FierceBrosnan]

Make it a challenge. If a user wants another banned, they can nominate them for a ban, but then, there's a deathmatch poll between them and whoever loses gets banned. The other guy has to accept the deathmatch though so you couldn't have just one popular dude going around banning everyone.

Have we finally reached the "Tournament Arc" part of the Kiwifarms saga?

 

[AprilRains]

This except I agree unironically.

I don't think he was kidding. I sure ain't.

 

[W00K #17]

Make it a challenge. If a user wants another banned, they can nominate them for a ban, but then, there's a deathmatch poll between them and whoever loses gets banned. The other guy has to accept the deathmatch though so you couldn't have just one popular dude going around banning everyone.

Perhaps make it a two thirds majority vote requirement for anyone to get banned so we're really only banning people that pretty much everyone hates also?

 

[HG 400]

I shall now hope for something very funny to happen to the gloaters.

You should make a TTS thread complaining about his ban. I did.

 

[FierceBrosnan]

Perhaps make it a two thirds majority vote requirement for anyone to get banned so we're really only banning people that pretty much everyone hates also?

If you abstain then you have no right to complain!