Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
24 manginas -
Well, again, you're just trolling. In order for this to occur you'd need to define what empathy even is and how does it manifest. So any research would depend on how would this be defined and measured. Hell, there aren't even clear definitions for affective and cognitive empathy yet. I read this text while ago http://ujpb.org/research/volume-7/are-there-gender-differences-in-empathy/ and it seems to indicate that the levels are similar and that women only show higher empathy when being previously informed that this is what is measured. I am also not sure if they measured just empathy of women for men or how.


My argument mainly comes from tribalism. In ancient tribes women took care of children and other women and men took care of everybody. So men naturally developed these instincts while women couldn't. This is obvious if you see how women react to a man crying and vice versa.

@Holden do you like video games at all? Some video games can have very complex storylines and you showed interest in story-telling, so I wonder if there's any that stand out to you.
i like many video games but am mostly tuned towards older games, since i never got a ps3 or 4 and don't really follow new PC games either.

You've missed everything I was trying to convey, Holden. Was that willfully or just an oversight? It has to be one or the other: pettiness or stupidity. Neither reflects well on you.
It's neither. I am just exposing your empty phrases for what they are.
 
i like many video games but am mostly tuned towards older games, since i never got a ps3 or 4 and don't really follow new PC games either.

@Holden I have a lot of friends who are the same. They grew up on the older games and they don't have much interest in the newer ones.

Can you specify a game as your overall favourite? I loved the Mario games and some of the Final Fantasy games when I was a kid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taily Puff
So THAT is how you get into a relationship with a lesbian!! You became one!!
6vY3tsNyVw3XeAq88H2btfpcaS1Lz.jpg

@Holden
 
24 manginas -
Well, again, you're just trolling. In order for this to occur you'd need to define what empathy even is and how does it manifest. So any research would depend on how would this be defined and measured. Hell, there aren't even clear definitions for affective and cognitive empathy yet. I read this text while ago http://ujpb.org/research/volume-7/are-there-gender-differences-in-empathy/ and it seems to indicate that the levels are similar and that women only show higher empathy when being previously informed that this is what is measured. I am also not sure if they measured just empathy of women for men or how.


My argument mainly comes from tribalism. In ancient tribes women took care of children and other women and men took care of everybody. So men naturally developed these instincts while women couldn't. This is obvious if you see how women react to a man crying and vice versa.

I'm not trolling, you dipshit. And that article proved absolutely nothing you claimed. Do you seriously add sentences to shit you read? Like, is your confirmation bias for your little crybaby conspiracy theory so pathological that you actual pretend to have read things that aren't there?

Fuck off. I politely asked you for proof, and again you proved only that you're full of shit.

How's your mom, man-child?
 
Quick recap:

This dunce made a very clear proclamation about empathy, and I asked for proof, correctly noting that he used said proclamation as the basis for a big conclusion of his.

He then..

- acts like the intellectual wimp that he is and says that empathy hasn't been clearly defined (though he had no trouble or confusion about using it to make a previous argument)

- accuses me of trolling

- links an article that does not prove his claim

- throws in something about tribalism which would make his disputed claim conjecture at best (and that's being generous)

- proved nothing, added lots of words, acted condescending, and was once again wrong

- did not mention anything about truckers, curiously.
 
Last edited:
24 manginas -
Well, again, you're just trolling. In order for this to occur you'd need to define what empathy even is and how does it manifest. So any research would depend on how would this be defined and measured. Hell, there aren't even clear definitions for affective and cognitive empathy yet. I read this text while ago http://ujpb.org/research/volume-7/are-there-gender-differences-in-empathy/ and it seems to indicate that the levels are similar and that women only show higher empathy when being previously informed that this is what is measured. I am also not sure if they measured just empathy of women for men or how.


My argument mainly comes from tribalism. In ancient tribes women took care of children and other women and men took care of everybody. So men naturally developed these instincts while women couldn't. This is obvious if you see how women react to a man crying and vice versa.
Is that all this is then, @Holden ? Are you telling us you're a woman, and that you want to be a big, stwong man so you can wape them all and not have a vagina anymore?
 
you're going over points i already explained


You already explained that you're a lazy coward who's content to be a leech on a society because a small segment of that society upsets you.

I think Null just wanted you to repeat it to reduce the risk of anyone forgetting how pathetic you are.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
So you are advocating gender segregation.

The US experimented with that a while ago with racial segregation. The concept was determined to be ineffectual at best and a horrifically cruel facade at worst.

Edit:It was deemed a failure and a dark time in American History
Apartheid is another example of institutionalized segregation. Separate is not equal in practice. Period.

@Holden, seriously now, all you're doing is calling people trolls. This is boring.
 
Dismissing people as trolls is an obvious way of not engaging in the actual argument and convincing himself he's justified in chickening out. But then maybe he throws in a Schopenhauer non-sequitur so you know he's totally an intellectual powerhouse!

FOR SRS GUISE. Just ask Luka.
 
Last edited:
this is like a 5 year-old asking me if i want to discuss nuclear physics with him.

Holden, I'm going to be straight with you.

You don't deserve anyone having a serious conversation with you. You don't deserve anyone trying to make rational arguments with you. You don't deserve to be addressed as if your beliefs should be dissected and analyzed. The things that you choose to share? These beliefs and theories of yours? They're so utterly and and completely incorrect that just conversing with you in the first place is being condescending to you.

It's not at all dissimilar to the way parents post their children's crayon scribbles on the refrigerator. The difference in that case is that the child is being encouraged and praised because they've literally done the best they possibly could do so far. The adults in their life want them to know they should be proud, and should continue trying to do their best as they grow and develop.
You, on the other hand? You're deliberately operating under your maximum capacity. You're clearly smart enough to know better, but due to some combination of laziness and unwarranted self-importance, you've opted to take a path full of bile and hate instead of putting in the effort to make yourself a better person.

Every single time someone on the internet responds to you with anything other than scorn and disdain? Every single time someone offers their time and mental energy to talk to you like you're you're a human being? Every single time someone talks to you without blatantly insulting you? They're extending you a very real courtesy. They're offering you a chance to show some glimmer of self-awareness, to show that maybe you can see through your own lies and delusions and act like a big boy for a few minutes.

And every time someone has offered you that courtesy, and taken a moment to ask what the crayon scribbling you call logic is supposed to be? you've spat at them, insulted them, lied to them, lied to yourself, and continued to wallow in your own filth and laziness. You don't have over a thousand pages here because there's some secret validity to what you're posting. You're only here because everyone is staring, slack-jawed, that someone could embrace being so far beneath their potential. You're so low, that you're beneath yourself. And as a result, everything you could have accomplished in life, every piece of art you could have made or machine you could have built or child you could have raised, they'll never be anything more than a figment. A ghost of a life that could have been, hanging sadly over a monument to how thoroughly one person could fail.

So, with that out of the way, tell me champ, how's your mommy doing today?
 
Last edited:
I never commented on the previous thread despite having kept up with the first few hundred pages. Mr Holden's abhorrent views on women were quite obviously the machinations of a unbelievably pathetic and inadequate mind. I had believed he would eventually get bored and run away. I was very wrong.

Mr Holden, normal people do not have a thousand post+ thread about them on here. Were you capable of analysis you would realise that the best way to deal with a thread here is to ignore it. Instead your approach has cemented you in the culture of the kiwifarms.net. Your pathetic analysis of society has led to similarly inept conclusions about the nature of relationships. No doubt you will be as successful with women as you are in getting this forum to leave you alone.

I don't believe for one minute that you possess the analytical skills to see the simple truth in this so I don't know why im bothering to post now. Happy 2nd thread, you fucking lolcow.
 
Between this and his ED page being at the top of Google's search results for his name, his chances of becoming employed and in a relationship are now completely non existent. You want to keep digging your grave Holden? Have you concluded that's the only way to reach China?
 
Quick recap:

This dunce made a very clear proclamation about empathy, and I asked for proof, correctly noting that he used said proclamation as the basis for a big conclusion of his.

He then..

- acts like the intellectual wimp that he is and says that empathy hasn't been clearly defined (though he had no trouble or confusion about using it to make a previous argument)

- accuses me of trolling

- links an article that does not prove his claim

- throws in something about tribalism which would make his disputed claim conjecture at best (and that's being generous)

- proved nothing, added lots of words, acted condescending, and was once again wrong

- did not mention anything about truckers, curiously.
So tries to claim something with no proof and lack of capitalization. Sounds like a typical @Holden post.

Hey @Holden, how did things go with the begging a lesbian for sex last night?
Oh shit, this. Did you rape your way to sex or did you finally learn what a homosexual is?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back