Nah, he's just a socialist. I find it fascinating that socialists and commies somehow think that if the economy craters and everything goes to absolute shit economically that somehow everyone will magically want to join them in some kind of revolution.
View attachment 892256
Is Bernie high or something? In what universe will the GND actually work? He’s pretty much piggybacking off of AOC now. He should retire.
Slightly incorrect: they want Israel and all Zionists destroyed. Jews are explicitly protected from Muslims provided they are not in revolt or otherwise impeding the Muslim state; Jews, Christians, and any other monotheistic religion that validates the sancity of the Old Testament/Torah are protected but open to reprisal if they start trying to play games or buck Islamic authority.
Israel taking land from Arab Muslims goes directly against that, so now all jews are suspect of being agents of Mossad.
Slightly incorrect: they want Israel and all Zionists destroyed. Jews are explicitly protected from Muslims provided they are not in revolt or otherwise impeding the Muslim state; Jews, Christians, and any other monotheistic religion that validates the sancity of the Old Testament/Torah are protected but open to reprisal if they start trying to play games or buck Islamic authority.
Israel taking land from Arab Muslims goes directly against that, so now all jews are suspect of being agents of Mossad.
Slightly incorrect: they want Israel and all Zionists destroyed. Jews are explicitly protected from Muslims provided they are not in revolt or otherwise impeding the Muslim state; Jews, Christians, and any other monotheistic religion that validates the sancity of the Old Testament/Torah are protected but open to reprisal if they start trying to play games or buck Islamic authority.
Israel taking land from Arab Muslims goes directly against that, so now all jews are suspect of being agents of Mossad.
Then again, considering the historic persecution of Jews in Muslim lands, and Muhammad's unabrogated Quranic verses being rather all-encompassing commands to force all people into Islam, including Jews and Christians, I'm pressing a hard X to doubt Muslims not wanting Jews destroyed.
I'm not a religious man, but if I was, I could consider the Islamic conception of God, Allah, to be no more than a disguise of Satan or the Devil.
Allah appears to me to be an approximation of a one-track mind righteous God (what the RPG spergs would call Lawful Stupid) and his depiction by itself I have no quibble with. My issue with Islam is how so much of their doctrine seems to line up perfectly with whatever Mohammed's current problems were.
Mohammed wants to bang more than one chick, oh look Allah is totally ok with that.
Mohammed wants to bang an underage chick, its cool because Allah is ok with bending the rules in this case.
Mohammed is in the religious minority, oh Allah preaches how all religions should coexist harmoniously.
Mohammed controls the religious majority, Allah demands tribute from the lesser religions.
Mohammed is the weaker military power, Allah thinks peace is fine and dandy.
Mohammed is the stronger military power, Jihad is the only way for Allah.
It just makes me suspicious after a while how neatly it lines up for Mohammed. Also, this is where you get all the arguments about Jihad and its merits. Mohammed preached out of both sides of his mouths and called it all the words of god, so his followers get to reconcile vastly disparate doctrines in an attempt at an ontological whole.
Then again, considering the historic persecution of Jews in Muslim lands, and Muhammad's unabrogated Quranic verses being rather all-encompassing commands to force all people into Islam, including Jews and Christians, I'm pressing a hard X to doubt Muslims not wanting Jews destroyed.
I'm not a religious man, but if I was, I could consider the Islamic conception of God, Allah, to be no more than a disguise of Satan or the Devil.
Oh that's not to say we don't all know how it will actually turn out.
I mean religion alone didn't protect the Armenians from genocide - but they couldn't be genocided for their religion,they were genocided because the Sultan wanted their shit DEFINITELY determined they were all a bunch of traitors to the Islamic cause.
Allah appears to me to be an approximation of a one-track mind righteous God (what the RPG spergs would call Lawful Stupid) and his depiction by itself I have no quibble with. My issue with Islam is how so much of their doctrine seems to line up perfectly with whatever Mohammed's current problems were.
Mohammed wants to bang more than one chick, oh look Allah is totally ok with that.
Mohammed wants to bang an underage chick, its cool because Allah is ok with bending the rules in this case.
Mohammed is in the religious minority, oh Allah preaches how all religions should coexist harmoniously.
Mohammed controls the religious majority, Allah demands tribute from the lesser religions.
Mohammed is the weaker military power, Allah thinks peace is fine and dandy.
Mohammed is the stronger military power, Jihad is the only way for Allah.
It just makes me suspicious after a while how neatly it lines up for Mohammed. Also, this is where you get all the arguments about Jihad and its merits. Mohammed preached out of both sides of his mouths and called it all the words of god, so his followers get to reconcile vastly disparate doctrines in an attempt at an ontological whole.
Oh my nigga, you are only scratching the surface. This is a big long, but hang with me here, the pay off is worth it.
You know that ol' chestnut about how "its not rape unless there are 4 witnesses?" You can thank Mohammed being cucked for that.
Mohammed married his youngest wife, Aisha, when she was 9* and he was in his 50s. Now its sort of hard to tell for certain because no one was going to go on record saying God's earthly messenger married an uggo, but not to much is said about the looks of his other wives, while there's universal agreement Aisha was a total smoke show.
-So hottie wife, 40 years his junior.
Well, as Mohammed is traveling, according to the story, Aisha loses some jewerly, a chain that was given to her by Mohammed (and shows she's better than the other wives, see spergy footnote below) so she drops out of the carvan to back track and look for it. Desert Sun gets high, so she goes and chills out by the oasis.
One of Aisha's bodyguards, a virile and strapping young lad about her age, noticed she was missing, went back for her, and they had to wait at the Oasis for a few hours until the midday sun passed and it was cooler.
So sure enough around evening time, Aisha's coming back, riding on this nice strapping young soldier's horse, both assuring everyone nothing happened. Aisha DEFINITELY just lost her jewerly, the soldier JUST HAPPENED to turn back to look for her, they definitely didn't arrange to meet for a tryst at the oasis. ALL COINCIDENCES, I PROMISE.
Well, rumors start spreading around the court. And it looks like Mohammed's about to have some issues, because people are demanding an investigation into his wife's fidelity.
But wouldn't you know that just around this time Allah goes and blesses Mohammed with two visions! The first is DEFINITE proof that his wife didn't fuck that nice young man who was not 50 years old and in excellent shape. The second is that Allah also told him that it was an affront to Allah if anyone were to make accusations about the honor of a woman unless there are 4 witnesses.
Mohammed also had a revelation that his wives were to wear full-body muslin veils when they weren't alone with him. Muslin is a very thin, whispy fabric. If it is not removed voluntarily it will rip. So therefore if anyone was to accuse Mohammed's wives of unfaithfulness, they had better bring a basketball team of witnesses. Since she'd have to be in on it, because if it was rape there'd be a shredded muslin veil.
That sure was an excellently timed revelation from Allah, I tell you!
Just like the revelation that made him realize that didn't matter what he said before, its what's he's saying now that matters. IF there's a more recent revelation that contradicts and older one, that older one is wrong. So says Allah! Also, Allah says he's only talking to me. I know there were other people he talked to before, but Allah assures me that I'm the last person he'll ever talk to. So if anyone else says they have Allah's revelations, they are DEFINITELY a tool of satan. I promise.
:tmyk:
I mean FFS, Joseph Smith at least pretended there were some sweet golden tablets.
Too spergy to have out:
The tl;dr is that Aisha was a narcissistic bitch who HAD to be better than everyone and had to be the first and best of everything. Like she wanted to make herself a Mary Sue. The fact she wasn't Mohammed's first wife, or that she never had kids because ol' Mo was shooting blanks by the time she came around really ate at her.
Anyway, according to Arab tribal custom that was codified into Islamic law, a girl can be married off at any age, but if she hasn't had her period yet, he cannot consummate for at least 3 years after the marriage, and only if she's had her period by then. LOL if you believe they hold out for 3 years. Anyway.
So because every other woman started bleeding around 12 or 13, its completely consistent with her later behavior to have said "Oh yeah? well I got my period at 9!" and since there's no birth certificates, we sort of have to take her word for it.
Muhammed was generally "I dunno, bitch say I fucked her when she was nine, then she was nine. I ain't up there counting rings or nothing when I'm getting at it. Sheeeeeeit")
Muhammed's other wives had all been married before, Aisha was the only poon her got to be first with, so she was likely to try to play being married off at even younger age to emphasize her virginity vs. those other sluts he married.
Depending on who's accounts you believe, there are a couple accounts that agree she wasn't married until atleast 10, and didn't give up the pooty until she was 15-16... and that its possible she wasn't a virgin.
She didn't really start pushing the virgin angle until after Mohammed's death, claiming she was divinely intended for him to boost her standing as his successor.
But anyway, even assuming the whole "9 years old" thing was simple bragging and they didn't fuck till she was 13, he's still a 50 year old banging a junior highschooler. People were getting married and fuckin' earlier in those day to be sure, but 13 and 50 was an eyebrow raising gap even then.
(Having more than one wife was totes fine. Where Mohammed I mean Allah stretched the law was to let Mohammed have so many. And that truly was less about the bangin' and more about politics. Except for Aisha, its generally agreed she was strictly eye candy.)
edit: corrected some shit I misremembered in the spergnote
I sometimes wonder if the guy who stood outside the cave making spooky noises and going "Moooohaaaamaaaad, it's me, Allah... oooooOOOOOoooo..." looked back on what happened and went "Shit, this joke went waaay too far."
I know that this political ad is supposed to be a parody but I would much rather they were just like this all the time. If we're gonna' be stupid we should at least be American about it, goddamnit.
For everything actually, you can't even withdraw money without a ID and to vote you have to get a ID and be registered in the database, that of course doesnt stop our imbeciles in charge to nationalizing muslims, chineses and colombians so fast that if we have a new administration we probably are going to have to make a wall
Does the Democrat party have no idea on how to do foreign policy? Islam and Judaism aren’t exactly on good terms. Allowing Omar and Talib into Israel would jeopardize the American alliance with Israel.
I know that this political ad is supposed to be a parody but I would much rather they were just like this all the time. If we're gonna' be stupid we should at least be American about it, goddamnit.
"Our children will have to take care of him!" sounds exactly like geriatric Sleepy Joe. And the one with crazy hand gestures that won't stay in one place? Sounds like Beto.
It wasn't that long ago when these people were saying, without a shred of irony: "Israeli treatment of the Palestinians today is comparable to the Nazis’ treatment of the Jews, and policies of “ethnic cleansing” or “genocide.”
It wasn't that long ago when these people were saying, without a shred of irony: "Israeli treatment of the Palestinians today is comparable to the Nazis’ treatment of the Jews, and policies of “ethnic cleansing” or “genocide.”
Unfortunately, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is colored heavily by propaganda on all sides, so rational discussion of it is almost impossible to find on the internet.
