Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

Women’s sports are more fun to watch now that trannies can beat the shit out of biological women.
So I guess that’s an improvement.
God, imagine training for years and years and sacrificing so much to reach the best you can get...only to get fucking obliterated by a MTF with zero effort on his part and you can't speak out about it or you'd get #cancelled and harassed. Honestly fucking hilarious how people have inadvertently started fucking over women with their troon shit.
 
God, imagine training for years and years and sacrificing so much to reach the best you can get...only to get fucking obliterated by a MTF with zero effort on his part and you can't speak out about it or you'd get #cancelled and harassed. Honestly fucking hilarious how people have inadvertently started fucking over women with their troon shit.
“Back into the poké ball, you muslim piece of shit!”

23CBCB77-54C0-48DC-AC99-B27EE4AB8661.jpeg
 
Strangely, neovaginas are incredibly resistant to bacterial infection. When even single-celled organisms refuse to go there, your dating prospects don't look too hot.

(the technical medical reason is that it's just skin and not a mucous membrane.)

How do you mean? The legendary stink has to come from something... not supposed to be there. Someone posted a link to a peer reviewed study researching the bacterial flora of neovaginas a while back in the thread, and it mentioned a very foul odor being present in all the examined neovaginas. Clearly they found it significant enough to include in the results, even though testing for smell was not even a study criterion.
 
How do you mean? The legendary stink has to come from something... not supposed to be there. Someone posted a link to a peer reviewed study researching the bacterial flora of neovaginas a while back in the thread, and it mentioned a very foul odor being present in all the examined neovaginas. Clearly they found it significant enough to include in the results, even though testing for smell was not even a study criterion.
I suspect that type of bacteria is the kind that naturally is on the skin, like athlete's foot or those causing armpit odor.

Also, there IS a mucuous membrane attached at the inside end to produce lubrication, whether it is a section of their colon or their peritoneum or such. I don't think they make 100% "dry" neovags that are essentially functionally very deep navels.
 
I suspect that type of bacteria is the kind that naturally is on the skin, like athlete's foot or those causing armpit odor.

Also, there IS a mucuous membrane attached at the inside end to produce lubrication, whether it is a section of their colon or their peritoneum or such. I don't think they make 100% "dry" neovags that are essentially functionally very deep navels.

1. Most neovaj I’ve read about in the lit test positive for fecal bacteria or other inappropriate bacterial bloom inside, usually a mix of skin and fecal bacteria. In the rare case that the flora mixture is similar to skin, usually one or more strains of bacteria are blown completely out of whack, resulting in what can politely be called ‘bacterial vaginosis’ or, more accurately, stink ditch. Ever seen the horrors inside the folds on my 600 lb life? Like that, but worse, and made of bacteria instead of candida.

2. No, they just flip the dick inside out for most. That’s why jazz Jennings having a hormone-shriveled penis was such a big deal. It was too small to do the operation correctly.

Don’t say stuff like ‘I suspect’ and ‘I think’ and then state things as if they are fact. You were wrong on both counts.

Edit: here’s the study if you feel like learning instead of making up ideas and pretending they reflect reality https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695466/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
1. Most neovaj I’ve read about in the lit test positive for fecal bacteria or other inappropriate bacterial bloom inside

2. No, they just flip the dick inside out for most. That’s why jazz Jennings having a hormone-shriveled penis was such a big deal. It was too small to do the operation correctly.

Don’t say stuff like ‘I suspect’ and ‘I think’ and then state things as if they are fact. You were wrong on both counts.

1. If the membrane of choice is a part of the colon, faecal bacteria is not exactly unexpected. Note that faecal bacteria do migrate and end up in the vagina as well, the low pH of the vaginal environment kills it.

2. No, they do attach a section of mucuous membrane, usually the sigmoid colon, to produce lubrication. Rectosigmoid vaginoplasty is consistently favoured in articles discussing various methods, I really doubt these surgeons sing the praises of one while engaging in a different method.
 
. No, they do attach a section of mucuous membrane, usually the sigmoid colon, to produce lubrication. Rectosigmoid vaginoplasty is consistently favoured in articles discussing various methods, I really doubt these surgeons sing the praises of one while engaging in a different method.

Popoto, again with the "i really doubt" and then making shit up. here is a study that QUANTIFIES SRS types and states " The penile skin inversion technique is the method of choice for most gender surgeons." They found 1,461 patients with penile skin inversion, and 102 with bowel vaginoplasty. Penile inversion (no bowel) accounts for over 90% of MTF SRS.

Also did you actually read the paper you sent me, or did you just look for key words and say "yes this summarizes my bias, perfect"? It mentioned using the bowel and compared it to other methods, but didn't necessarily state it was better and in fact concluded that the best predictive outcome for positive results is depth of the stink ditch and aesthetics.

Edit, and back to point 1, you're not reading the lit that is linked in this thread and choosing instead to make shit up again. There is no "low pH of the vagina" to kill bacteria in troons. The average pH of a neovagina is 5.88. The pH of an actual vagina is 3.8-4.5. That is actually extremely significant.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Popoto, again with the "i really doubt" and then making shit up. here is a study that QUANTIFIES SRS types and states " The penile skin inversion technique is the method of choice for most gender surgeons." They found 1,461 patients with penile skin inversion, and 102 with bowel vaginoplasty. Penile inversion (no bowel) accounts for over 90% of MTF SRS.

Also did you actually read the paper you sent me, or did you just look for key words and say "yes this summarizes my bias, perfect"? It mentioned using the bowel and compared it to other methods, but didn't necessarily state it was better and in fact concluded that the best predictive outcome for positive results is depth of the stink ditch and aesthetics.

Edit, and back to point 1, you're not reading the lit that is linked in this thread and choosing instead to make shit up again. There is no "low pH of the vagina" to kill. The average pH of a neovagina is 5.88. The pH of an actual vagina is 3.8-4.5. That is actually extremely significant.

To add- The colon isn't preferred by toons because it will cause fecal bacteria, odor, and the nasty orange mucus beyond the nasty results of the penile inversion method. They only choose the colon as a last resort if there isn't enough skin to be yielded from the penis because the outcome when you attach the colon is much more mucus secretion and odor because it's the freakin' colon.
 
To add- The colon isn't preferred by toons because it will cause fecal bacteria, odor, and the nasty orange mucus beyond the nasty results of the penile inversion method. They only choose the colon as a last resort if there isn't enough skin to be yielded from the penis because the outcome when you attach the colon is much more mucus secretion and odor because it's the freakin' colon.

Also the fucking thing can still move like it's digesting food. I posted it here already. A dude talked about how he can feel the contractions. 😱
 
There is no "low pH of the vagina" to kill bacteria in troons. The average pH of a neovagina is 5.88. The pH of an actual vagina is 3.8-4.5. That is actually extremely significant.
Huh, another one of those things I'd just never have thought about. For reference, tomatoes are like a four and m.ilk or yogurt is like a six. I have no idea the pH for tard cum.
 
Popoto, again with the "i really doubt" and then making shit up. here is a study that QUANTIFIES SRS types and states " The penile skin inversion technique is the method of choice for most gender surgeons." They found 1,461 patients with penile skin inversion, and 102 with bowel vaginoplasty. Penile inversion (no bowel) accounts for over 90% of MTF SRS.
I have figured out your problem - you seem to believe the penile inversion technique excludes bowel sections. To quote one of the papers I linked:

"Nowadays, the two most widespread techniques for neovaginal reconstruction are “penile inversion technique”, with or without combining scrotal flaps and the use of intestinal pedicled transplants."

In short, they are both forms of penile inversion techniques, just one has more of the penis than the other. In the cases where bowel bits are not used, an extensive description of using the urethra that formed the penis shaft as part of the "flap" is mentioned, so no, penile inversion is not a dry skin only procedure.

Even just looking at the abstract of the paper you linked, they quantified 26 studies as meeting their criteria, not that they quantifed individual instances or actually tracked surgery preferences, and they certainly did not find "patients".

Also did you actually read the paper you sent me, or did you just look for key words and say "yes this summarizes my bias, perfect"? It mentioned using the bowel and compared it to other methods, but didn't necessarily state it was better and in fact concluded that the best predictive outcome for positive results is depth of the stink ditch and aesthetics.

"Rectosigmoid vaginoplasty results in a well-proportioned, self-lubricating neovagina, which does not require postoperative dilatation for extended periods of time [35, 36]. "

This is just one of the many quotes, which I cannot be bothered to go back and forth with on the phone. The other paper looks solely at rectosigmoid vaginoplasty, and part of its findingd are cross-mentioned in the first anyway.

Edit, and back to point 1, you're not reading the lit that is linked in this thread and choosing instead to make shit up again. There is no "low pH of the vagina" to kill bacteria in troons. The average pH of a neovagina is 5.88. The pH of an actual vagina is 3.8-4.5. That is actually extremely significant.
I never said anything about the pH of neovaginas. I said migration of faecal bacteria is common in vaginas, as in the organ normal adult females have. Where did I say troons have functioning vaginas? The point I am making is that migrating faecal bacteria isn't some aberration that only exists in troons.

You seem to have made up an argument in your mind that has very little to do with what I said.
 
Honestly fucking hilarious how people have inadvertently started fucking over women with their troon shit.

It's not inadvertent. Troons actually hate women.

Where did I say troons have functioning vaginas? The point I am making is that migrating faecal bacteria isn't some aberration that only exists in troons.

The difference is frankenginas have zero defenses against them.
 
A wild Asian "transbian" appears https://twitter.com/isreallytwodogs/status/1157347827376373760
äölä.png

>Big naturals
'äö'.png

A wild black "transbian" appears:
'äö'öläö.png

äö.png
 
A wild Asian "transbian" appears https://twitter.com/isreallytwodogs/status/1157347827376373760
View attachment 895622
>Big naturals
View attachment 895619
A wild black "transbian" appears:
View attachment 895620
View attachment 895621
I love it when they don't even attempt to pass.
 
All of
I have figured out your problem - you seem to believe the penile inversion technique excludes bowel sections. To quote one of the papers I linked:

"Nowadays, the two most widespread techniques for neovaginal reconstruction are “penile inversion technique”, with or without combining scrotal flaps and the use of intestinal pedicled transplants."

In short, they are both forms of penile inversion techniques, just one has more of the penis than the other. In the cases where bowel bits are not used, an extensive description of using the urethra that formed the penis shaft as part of the "flap" is mentioned, so no, penile inversion is not a dry skin only procedure.

Even just looking at the abstract of the paper you linked, they quantified 26 studies as meeting their criteria, not that they quantifed individual instances or actually tracked surgery preferences, and they certainly did not find "patients".



"Rectosigmoid vaginoplasty results in a well-proportioned, self-lubricating neovagina, which does not require postoperative dilatation for extended periods of time [35, 36]. "

This is just one of the many quotes, which I cannot be bothered to go back and forth with on the phone. The other paper looks solely at rectosigmoid vaginoplasty, and part of its findingd are cross-mentioned in the first anyway.


I never said anything about the pH of neovaginas. I said migration of faecal bacteria is common in vaginas, as in the organ normal adult females have. Where did I say troons have functioning vaginas? The point I am making is that migrating faecal bacteria isn't some aberration that only exists in troons.

You seem to have made up an argument in your mind that has very little to do with what I said.

All this tells me is that this surgery should never ever ever ever be done. There is no reason anyone should ever subject themselves to such madness. Nope. Nope. Nope.
 
Back