DarksydePhil / TheyCallMeDSP / Phil Burnell - General Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Didn't know he was studying to become a copyright lawyer. Complete nut job.
Phil just clarified that people who think he's talking about copyright are idiots. It's not copyright.

He neglected to say what it was if not copyright, though. He changed the subject immediately.

Remember kids, things you make up don't have to be factually correct, you just have to assert they are and insult everyone who corrects you and that makes you right.
 
Phil is so SALTY over this lol

 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20190817-220746_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20190817-220746_Chrome.jpg
    240.5 KB · Views: 189
In tonight's episode of DSPig: Attorney at Law.
During the unrecorded changeover from Super Mario 64 gameplay to Judgement gameplay, Philip "Darksydephil" Burnell, Esq. is informed that detractors are selling t-shirts with the image of DarksydeKat's pet, Jasper Burnell, on them.
The Snort & Sniff Grifter reacts with the expected mix of misinformation and toxicity.

"It's completely illegal to do that!"
"The second they say, 'Jasper'- that's it! It's illegal."
"Anyone in the stream chat saying, 'Copyright', is an idiot! Because it has nothing to do with copyright law at all."



















Philip "Darksydephil" Burnell needs your money. He really does. He needs your money to . . . PAY HIS BILLS.
 
In tonight's episode of DSPig: Attorney at Law.
During the unrecorded changeover from Super Mario 64 gameplay to Judgement gameplay, Philip "Darksydephil" Burnell, Esq. is informed that detractors are selling t-shirts with the image of DarksydeKat's pet, Jasper Burnell, on them.
The Snort & Sniff Grifter reacts with the expected mix of misinformation and toxicity.

"It's completely illegal to do that!"
"The second they say, 'Jasper'- that's it! It's illegal."
"Anyone in the stream chat saying, 'Copyright', is an idiot! Because it has nothing to do with copyright law at all."

View attachment 896199

















Philip "Darksydephil" Burnell needs your money. He really does. He needs your money to . . . PAY HIS BILLS.


"its fine if it has a face but as soon as you put jasper in text on it its illegal" yeah sure thats how it works...
 
In tonight's episode of DSPig: Attorney at Law.
During the unrecorded changeover from Super Mario 64 gameplay to Judgement gameplay, Philip "Darksydephil" Burnell, Esq. is informed that detractors are selling t-shirts with the image of DarksydeKat's pet, Jasper Burnell, on them.
The Snort & Sniff Grifter reacts with the expected mix of misinformation and toxicity.

"It's completely illegal to do that!"
"The second they say, 'Jasper'- that's it! It's illegal."
"Anyone in the stream chat saying, 'Copyright', is an idiot! Because it has nothing to do with copyright law at all."

View attachment 896199

















Philip "Darksydephil" Burnell needs your money. He really does. He needs your money to . . . PAY HIS BILLS.
Thank god no one owned a crocodile named Dundee before 1986, otherwise Paramount Pictures would have been in huge trouble with their illegal shit. And THANK GOD no one owned a Saint-Bernard called Beethoven before the movie came out, otherwise the movie would have been absolutely illegal. Or a duck named Daffy. Or a bunny named Bugs. Lassie. Flipper. Skippy. So many potential lawsuits, however thankfully those names had never been used before for those specific animals, ever, anywhere, by anyone. Otherwise, it would been serious grounds for severe lawsuits. Everyone knows that.
 
The man is a goliath grouper. He doesn't just take the bait, he takes everything. People kept asking him about youtube money and he continued to pause his GTAIV gameplay to explain for the billionth time all of his youtube strife. It's a foregone conclusion, and now he is acknowledging clear bait with the shirts lol.
 
Thank god no one owned a crocodile named Dundee before 1986, otherwise Paramount Pictures would have been in huge trouble with their illegal shit. And THANK GOD no one owned a Saint-Bernard called Beethoven before the movie came out, otherwise the movie would have been absolutely illegal. Or a duck named Daffy. Or a bunny named Bugs. Lassie. Flipper. Skippy. So many potential lawsuits, however thankfully those names had never been used before for those specific animals, ever, anywhere, by anyone. Otherwise, it would been serious grounds for severe lawsuits. Everyone knows that.
or a pig named phil
 
Just saw Phil reacting to a naked guy showing up on Judgment. Leave it to Phil to predictably act completely mature and not like a mix between a shocked 70 year-old woman who’s never seen a naked buttocks in thirty years, and a 13 year-old middle schooler who thinks butts are absolutely hilarious because that’s where poop and farts come from. Also, predictably, his reaction was full of about twenty “UHHHH. WHAT THUH FUUUCK?”’s and constant high-pitched ack-acking. He’s so goddamn obnoxious.

Also, during his quick review after he finished Mario 64, I noticed he said, slightly paraphrasing, “Don’t get me wrong, it’s a great game, even though it has some really challenging parts...” Once again, he finds the challenging parts of a game to be among its negative qualities. I’ve been watching his streams a lot the last few months because I’ve been cooped up in the house due to waiting on surgery, and I think the only game I saw him play where he pretty much had zero negative things to say about it (until it started running long on his opinion towards the end just because it was time for him to clock out and how dare a game not end exactly when he’s ready to end the streeem) was Stranger Things. A game where all he did was literally spam the attack button and press the “switch character” button throughout 80% of its length. I’m really ready to see Phil get his ass completely kicked by a game again. It’s been too long.
 
Don't know much about PlanetJeff, but trolling someone about their dead wife is pretty fucked up imo. Also, is Swaggins a mod again? Saw someone asking him for a ban in the chat.

I posted his chat logs a few days ago, he's saying fuck trollz, tip to make trollz mad, retarded shit like that. I use trollZ because that's how that boomer spelled it.
He also helped Phil scam fans out of money on the Jasper reveal stream by a prearranged 1,000$ donation.

If he's going out of his way to antagonise trolls it's fair game.
His tard wrangler dying does not give him the OK to be an asshole, neither should it protect him from counter trolling.
 
I posted his chat logs a few days ago, he's saying fuck trollz, tip to make trollz mad, exceptional shit like that. I use trollZ because that's how that boomer spelled it.
He also helped Phil scam fans out of money on the Jasper reveal stream by a prearranged 1,000$ donation.

If he's going out of his way to antagonise trolls it's fair game.
His tard wrangler dying does not give him the OK to be an asshole, neither should it protect him from counter trolling.

Wanna know how much Daves fanbase has fucked me up? There's a little bit of me that doubts this person is even a widower. Would not be surprised if he said that for attention.

Do we know anything about him other than what he's let people know? For all we know this could be a 16 year old using a trust fund. A hypothetical dead spouse doesn't excuse a cunt personality.

Correct me if I'm wrong though, it's hard to keep these spastics in order.
 
I posted his chat logs a few days ago, he's saying fuck trollz, tip to make trollz mad, exceptional shit like that. I use trollZ because that's how that boomer spelled it.
He also helped Phil scam fans out of money on the Jasper reveal stream by a prearranged 1,000$ donation.

If he's going out of his way to antagonise trolls it's fair game.
His tard wrangler dying does not give him the OK to be an asshole, neither should it protect him from counter trolling.
i mean, im not gonna cry over the guy getting trolled or anything, but if you cant see a difference between 'haha this donation will get the trolls goats' and ' haha your dead wife is disappointed in you' then, all due respect, you might have a touch of the 'tism. Not trying to high-road you or anything, just saying.

Anyway, DSP(as usual) is the one who gains my ire. if true, Jeff is a grieving widow looking for some kind of connection with another person. DSP just seems to see him as a living wallet, taking advantage of a guy who lost his wife. Never once has he said something along the lines of 'hey jeff man i appreciate everything youve done for me, but you know you dont have to give me money to be appreciated right?' Instead, he only acknowledges him when he throws those sheckles his way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back