Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

I'm personally of the mind that you can thank the Dubya years for giving them a guy who was easily mockable for coming off dumb, who also so happened to use spurious shit to get us into Iraq after Afghanistan. Who also had a VP who looked like he abducted and strangled orphans to live forever. Made it easy to mock.

They are now incapable of making new jokes and ads, because they lowered the basic standards for "journalists". I also think they're still not used to getting told to fuck off when they try the "PC" card that worked for a few years.

Nice to see Tlaib's cuntishness ran in the family. Now I wish the Qarmatians salted Mecca now.

I was thinking about this today. You know the saying "Generals prepare for the last war"? I think it's like that. It was easy to hit Bush as inept and a failure because of how bad he was in both policy and presentation, and because comedy and mockery covered up how the Democrats really had no alternative answers half the time and were often just as culpable.

Look at New Orleans and Katrina. FEMA made a mess of things, but New Orleans is a corrupt deep-blue city that made no attempts to prepare and embezzled as much money as possible (powerlevel: I work with roadways, their 3rd-world levels of greed and failure to meet even basic requirements (literally, like knowing where their bridges are) after the storm are legendary in the DOT. Bush fucked up, but he was just one of many people. But by mocking Bush, you covered up how bad everyone else was.

They're trying to run the Bush playbook against Trump, a larger than life caricature ruling over some pretty good times. Hitting him as a fundamentalist is a no-start, the economy is good, and he's kept us out of war. He's the anti-Bush, you can't hit him in even remotely the same way.

I also wonder if it's a form of clinging to youth? Like the hippies who were still talking about the Vietnam war under Reagan, they can't let it go because it means that they're now the adults they're trying to rebel against. On a certain level, they want to stay the radical youth that are destined to shape the future, even though many of them are in their mid-30s or older. And they want to fight the same battles again and again as the underdog whose destined to win, which is why you see so much focus on opposing evangelicals even though the religious right is barely a shadow of its old self.

Is TDS the politics of the eternal manchild?
 
The native populations of Europe are not replacing themselves at hi number. Which means no taxable demographics when baby boomers die off and no work force. So the Muslims are being brought in to full a gap.
It's the most asinine expectation ever. How much tax do they think a bunch of non educated, unskilled workers will be putting into the system?

That's a trick question; they won't be putting in, they'll be taking out.

When it comes time for them to have to pick a new candidate, I think the established Paul Ryans of the party are going to want to disown the Trump group, which will again split the party, and that's going to hand the Democrats the win in 2024.
The Paul Ryans of the party are on the endangered species list. They'll be extinct by 2024.

There's no way the Dems get their shit together in time for 2024. They can't stop fighting among themselves long enough to fight the GOP. Until they do, I don't see moderates siding with them. A lot of them won't like voting Republican, but they'll hold their nose and do it because they understand it's the only lifeboat in sight.

I really don't see all that much conflict in the GOP right now. This is a right-wing populist party now. There's a place for Republicans who don't like that: The Democratic Party. The fact they're not wanted there either is a personal problem.

Except for Trump's larger than life personality, the party, at least the electorate, hasn't changed all that much. The main difference since 2016 seems to be, in what has to be the worst trade decision since the Red Sox traded away Babe Ruth for $25k, the Dems traded classical liberals for neocons.

The GOP now has the traditional conservatives and classical liberals. The Dems now have the neocons/neolibs and the progressives. There are absolutely zero redeeming qualities about that party right now. None.
 
there won't be a 2024 election. What going happen after 2020 election is complete and final devastation of the political systems credibility and descent into chaos. Trump will challenge the outcomes if he loses despite
If the loss is creditable or not. The democrats won't except anything except their power as legitimate and their base has been trained to see any non dem victory as a result of cheating. Republican voters won't accept a Democratic vote cause dems have demonstrated the willingness to cheat. If democrats do win fairly Republican voters won't accept it either cause many of them are waking up to the fact the democrats will harm them just for having a different opinion and resisting Democratic rule.
People said the same shit about Bush and Obama and both stepped down with little fuss Trump will too.
 
It's the most asinine expectation ever. How much tax do they think a bunch of non educated, unskilled workers will be putting into the system?

That's a trick question; they won't be putting in, they'll be taking out.

.
sounds like a beginnings of a a rape joke.

not my theory. Fill in population gap theory is something commonly found around the internet with different versions and explanations.


People said the same shit about Bush and Obama and both stepped down with little fuss Trump will too.

You and I both know there goin be a chimp out
 
sounds like a beginnings of a a rape joke.

not my theory. Fill in population gap theory is something commonly found around the internet with different versions and explanations.




You and I both know there goin be a chimp out
Oh, trust me, I know that's not your personal opinion. That's why I said "How much tax do they think."
 
EEC40D33-05C1-484A-9193-0600756E2B12.jpeg
0D1C3462-94B9-4B1D-AA2F-DEFE0FD84513.jpeg
6C8AAC47-21CB-4F2B-A56B-ADD3069576F3.jpeg
965DEB5F-2EA1-4797-A830-584A4947C8C7.jpeg
A510CC07-0C46-4E87-8C85-E60BAE0D1853.jpeg

MAGA is a cover for fascism and xenophobia.
 
See, this is what I'm expecting for 2024. Whether Trump is re-elected now or not, only I don't think the infighting amongst the Republicans will be as bad if he has another 4 years. When it comes time for them to have to pick a new candidate, I think the established Paul Ryans of the party are going to want to disown the Trump group, which will again split the party, and that's going to hand the Democrats the win in 2024. A lot of the establishment GOP are very tongue in cheek about their support for Trump, and I can see that whole fight to fill that particular power gap turning into a massive shit show once Trump is gone. Enough to end the party? Naaaah, no way. Party has been through many instances like that. Most recent was the Tea Party fun about 10 years ago. Same as how this little socialist experiment won't be the stone that brings down the Democrat party. But, I think that in-fighting that's going to happen WILL be enough for the Dems to snag a Presidential win in 2024.

It's possible America is going to just keep flip flopping between 8 years of a Republican President and 8 of a Democrat President over and over for as long as this nation exists.

And maybe that's by design, maybe the idea is to keep the American people chasing our tails so that the elites can continue on with their agendas, the Presidency is just the "I AM OZ!" show to keep us distracted from the "man behind the curtain"
 
See, this is what I'm expecting for 2024. Whether Trump is re-elected now or not, only I don't think the infighting amongst the Republicans will be as bad if he has another 4 years. When it comes time for them to have to pick a new candidate, I think the established Paul Ryans of the party are going to want to disown the Trump group, which will again split the party, and that's going to hand the Democrats the win in 2024. A lot of the establishment GOP are very tongue in cheek about their support for Trump, and I can see that whole fight to fill that particular power gap turning into a massive shit show once Trump is gone. Enough to end the party? Naaaah, no way. Party has been through many instances like that. Most recent was the Tea Party fun about 10 years ago. Same as how this little socialist experiment won't be the stone that brings down the Democrat party. But, I think that in-fighting that's going to happen WILL be enough for the Dems to snag a Presidential win in 2024.
So what you're saying is we need to elect Dan "Big Boss" Crenshaw in 2024? I'm fine with that.
 
So I took a walk through my home state of California today, and you'd think I'd be numb to it by now, but I'm still amazed by all the trash and detritus littering my state, along with the noticeable number of Hispanics who don't speak English in a country where English is the de facto national language.

If Californian Democrat policies lead to this, then I don't know why anyone of note takes Californian Democrat politicians or Californian Democrat political stances seriously anymore.

And why isn't anyone in the Bay Area, especially the ones who keep voting these policies and politicians in, actually noticing the negative effects they have on even that area? I live in Los Angeles County, and some places are straight gaudy in how litter-filled they are.
 
Last edited:
So I took a walk through my home state of California today, and you'd think I'd be numb to it by now, but I'm still amazed by all the trash and detritus littering my state, along with the noticeable number of Hispanics who don't speak English in a country where English is the de facto national language.

If Californian Democrat policies lead to this, then I don't know why anyone of note takes Californian politicians seriously anymore.
They're just so progressive, look how many standards they've wiped out and allowing anyone to do what they want!
 
6c8aac47-21cb-4f2b-a56b-add3069576f3-jpeg.896225


awful history, FDR didn't take office until 1933 for one

neither party from the 1860s would recognize either party from the 1930s, that's what seventy fucking years of events will do; also neither party supported slavery after the war, so a "full blown reversal" on that wasn't possible

the rest is bad too, the GOP was dependent on the north and west until the late 1980s, whenever the South flipped even partly it gave them national landslides, FDR and LBJ's landslides were because they took away the north... the GOP wasn't bleeding members it had been obliterated in the 1930s and made a very slow return over sixty years until the South finally flipped in 1992 and 1994

i hope the dr. isn't in history
 
They tend to zoom in or crop photos on purpose, or will actively lie and use wrong, old, or just plain made up photos when they want to. There's a reason my brain glazes over most "news" sites nowadays.

Trump's best Trumpism is Fake News.

The best part is Trump didn't build that.
CNN was using it cast shade on Pro-Trump media like Breitbart. Trump simply took it and turned it right back on their Clinton-shilling asses. It's this sort of petard-hoisting that I love watching.
 
They tend to zoom in or crop photos on purpose, or will actively lie and use wrong, old, or just plain made up photos when they want to. There's a reason my brain glazes over most "news" sites nowadays.

Trump's best Trumpism is Fake News... that and him making Bigly great again. Fucking love that word.
Good to know they learned nothing from 2016
 
i hope the dr. isn't in history

From her website...

"i live in brooklyn and i currently make sandwiches for a living, but so goes the way of the writer. most of my experience is in op-eds and researched articles for online magazines but my ideal career is working in television, behind the scenes."

So if the "omg why is everyone stupid except me?" avatar with purple hair didn't make it obvious enough, her degree is 100% worthless.
 
6c8aac47-21cb-4f2b-a56b-add3069576f3-jpeg.896225


awful history, FDR didn't take office until 1933 for one
....

i hope the dr. isn't in history

The absurd notion that the Democrats and Republicans suddenly just traded positions on their shit out of the blue is on par with Columbus proving the world wasn't flat. Too many liberals make this claim, and yet none have been able to answer the appropriate follow-up question: "Why would two opposed political parties suddenly switch positions they'd held, to some degree, since their inception?"

To claim Lincoln was like the modern Democrats? Well, he was a fan of deporting or imprisoning people who criticized him. He was all about destroying the lives of anyone who politically opposed him. Lincoln didn't give two shits about niggers, he just wanted to assert control over the Southern States. So yeah, he's a modern Democrat all right.

Democrats have always used niggers. They used them to perform forced labor, and they manipulate them to this very date to get the vote- because if niggers got wise to being played, the Democrats would be a footnote in history. And Democrats have mastered manipulating niggers- "Now, don't you go a-wanderin' too far from Massa's plantation. You can't make it out there as a freed man- those bushwhackers would give you a lynchin'! Why, you stay right here and let Massa take care of you, and all you gotta do is help Massa a little bit for his kindness!"

Every nigger that votes Democrat is a well-trained house nigger.
 
But they never give the same skepticism to the people they agree with. Bernie has three fucking houses and made millions off a book, he's still a good socialist and we must adopt his policies.
Im no socialist but if Bernie could get me 3 mansions and a million dollar book deal I'd consider them.
 
The best part is Trump didn't build that.
CNN was using it cast shade on Pro-Trump media like Breitbart. Trump simply took it and turned it right back on their Clinton-shilling asses. It's this sort of petard-hoisting that I love watching.
I recall Trump supporters using "fake news" before Trump did, but I don't recall hearing it from anyone else before that.
 
Back