Hellbound Hellhound
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2018
Throughout most of human history, aging has been considered an inevitable part of life. For about as long, myths about the possibility of avoiding aging have also persisted: from Herodotus's account of the Fountain of Youth, to Emperor Qin Shi Huang's quest to find the elixir of life, to the alchemist's search for the philosopher's stone, all the way to 19th and 20th century vampire mythology.
Today, medical science may be offering an alternative way to look at aging. A growing number of biomedical researchers are approaching aging not as an inevitable part of life, but as a series of degenerative pathologies which are co-morbid with disease, and which could, theoretically, be treated. Two notable areas of research include the studies which are currently ongoing into rapamycin and senolytic drugs: both of which have been demonstrated to significantly increase both the lifespan and healthspan of mice, and the latter of which is already showing promising results in early human trials.
The question all of this raises is how we ought to look at aging. For a long time, heart disease, osteoporosis, and Alzheimer's disease were all considered an inevitable part of getting older, yet today, they are all regarded as diseases by both society and the medical establishment. Perhaps this raises a deeper philosophical question concerning how we define and categorize diseases. Is obesity a disease, or is it the consequence of poor lifestyle choices? Is alopecia a disease, or a perfectly healthy expression of human physical diversity, to be embraced, rather than cured?
I already have my own views on the topic, but I'd be interested to see what other people have to say.
Today, medical science may be offering an alternative way to look at aging. A growing number of biomedical researchers are approaching aging not as an inevitable part of life, but as a series of degenerative pathologies which are co-morbid with disease, and which could, theoretically, be treated. Two notable areas of research include the studies which are currently ongoing into rapamycin and senolytic drugs: both of which have been demonstrated to significantly increase both the lifespan and healthspan of mice, and the latter of which is already showing promising results in early human trials.
The question all of this raises is how we ought to look at aging. For a long time, heart disease, osteoporosis, and Alzheimer's disease were all considered an inevitable part of getting older, yet today, they are all regarded as diseases by both society and the medical establishment. Perhaps this raises a deeper philosophical question concerning how we define and categorize diseases. Is obesity a disease, or is it the consequence of poor lifestyle choices? Is alopecia a disease, or a perfectly healthy expression of human physical diversity, to be embraced, rather than cured?
I already have my own views on the topic, but I'd be interested to see what other people have to say.