- Joined
- Apr 14, 2019
I dug around on Twitter and the story still goes that the defence has a stark g case as everything they said is true because Vic has to provide evidence that everything they say is false. Dear lord, nobody would ever win a court case if that were true. I mean I'm weak with law but I understand it's pretty much this simple:
-Did you make that statement?
-If yes, did that statement cause damages?
-If yes, then why can't the prosecution assume you're lying without proof?
I mean if someone accuses me of rape, and I can't prove it didn't happen, KV logic says I did it. Why shouldn't they have to prove it did happen? And you're telling me lawyers can't get that of all things into their head. I get they've only seen glimpses of it but dear God at least acknowledge Toye is screwed. They also really hate Ty and Nick and probably lie about the number of clients they get or are so jealous of the attention those two get over a lawsuit. I guess they too want a waifu battleship as a gift.
-Did you make that statement?
-If yes, did that statement cause damages?
-If yes, then why can't the prosecution assume you're lying without proof?
I mean if someone accuses me of rape, and I can't prove it didn't happen, KV logic says I did it. Why shouldn't they have to prove it did happen? And you're telling me lawyers can't get that of all things into their head. I get they've only seen glimpses of it but dear God at least acknowledge Toye is screwed. They also really hate Ty and Nick and probably lie about the number of clients they get or are so jealous of the attention those two get over a lawsuit. I guess they too want a waifu battleship as a gift.