V
VZ 467
Guest
kiwifarms.net
True. Just to clarify, in January Adam posted private messages between him and Todd to prove that Todd wasn't too fond of Vic. That's where that screenshot came from. This has probably all been archived and posted already, but will do it again, just in case.
View attachment 900936
View attachment 900937
View attachment 900939
View attachment 900940
![]()
Adam Sheehan on Twitter: "I know Todd is not a Vic fan so this could …
archived 29 Mar 2019 13:51:56 UTCarchive.fo
Is he claiming these are from Jessie Pridemore? I am having a hard time reading his english.
"I know Todd is not a Vic fan so this could have been moment to step up and publicly address things he’s seen. But he did not. Instead he went after Jessie. Easy target: already being attacked online, has screenshots of private conversations, it happened a while ago. "
The last sentence is confusing me. Who is the easy target who has screenshots of private conversations. Jessie or Todd.
Odd, it appears to have come as a counter reaction to this:

Adam Sheehan on Twitter
“I know Todd is not a Vic fan so this could have been moment to step up and publicly address things he’s seen. But he did not. Instead he went after Jessie. Easy target: already being attacked online, has screenshots of private conversations, it happened a while ago.”

Adam Sheehan on Twitter
“Earlier today @ToddHaberkorn made a response to @jessiepridemore’s post regarding an incident with @vicmignogna. #kickvic https://t.co/nkDtCUSaGZ He decided to include me in this response so I wanted to help add to the narrative.”
The facebook link he references is disabled or can not be shown.
HAH, thank you way back machine:

Adam Sheehan 🔜 Crunchyroll Expo on Twitter
“I know Todd is not a Vic fan so this could have been moment to step up and publicly address things he’s seen. But he did not. Instead he went after Jessie. Easy target: already being attacked online, has screenshots of private conversations, it happened a while ago.”
In regards to the photo showing Todd's statement on May 19th; the twitter post is dated 31. Jan at 14:52. Which means these messages were from 2018, since no YEAR is listed in the message, IF REAL. Big IF. Which it would have if it was from a previous year.
But if these screenshots were taken in 2019, then.....it should say a year there along with may 19th. Are these fake?
Messenger, which appears to be what is used, will date things as follow for things that are old af.
Example: 28th August. 2018, time: 05:30 pm
I have no belief that Adam Sheehan, screenshots everything willy-nilly about Vic stuff in MAY 2018 for no reason at all. Unless ya' know, civil conspiracy.
Well then, no energy shall be spent looking into the 2011 cons then. These are fake.
Last edited by a moderator: