Jesus, why won't you just use the "Preview" function under "More Options..." if your ability to post properly is still that unstable after the almost 5,000 messages you have left here? You have all the time in the world and people will still reply to your posts, even if you take the extra minute of checking if you have butchered yet another quotation. I'm pretty sure that function isn't affected by your restricted posting privileges. Seriously, how do you even manage to butcher them on such a regular base? When you hit the "Quote me now" button, all you have to do is typing in your message and hit the reply button and you should be fine.
It's not about what makes me likable or not. It's that my views can be shared
Marijan, they won't fall on fertile ground because you have absolutely no common ground with anybody here. Hell, even in loveshy circles your theories are considered to be extreme and that's quite a feat to be honest.
Your argumentational skills are absolutely atrocious, not to mention your overall manners when discussing with dissenting opinions. You know, I have read quite a few of your forum posts that you have left on that Croation forum in 2006/2007. The thing that is genuinely staggering to me is the fact that your entire argumentational skills and discussion behaviour haven't changed in the slightest since then. It is really the same discussion with your ridiculous views on women, some people mocking you for your that, some people actually trying to engage you in a discussion and your standard answers/insults that really haven't changed that much in over nine years. You managed to set up your blog and found Fschmidt's website, so you use links to them nowadays, but apart from that, it is the exact same thing.
So you have failed as a historian here and you fail as a political theorist. Believe me, I have read some of your shit and it is just laughable. You have no idea how difficult it is to build up a normative argumentation, you have no idea how often you neglect to consider fundamental meta-ethical principles, like
Hume's law for instance. You have no idea how biology works and how it affects human beings as persons, but you use that "knowledge" to prove some shit in hope nobody will further dig into it (anybody remember the excellent post by DD about races in the last thread?).
Your knowledge of history is completely clouded by your pathetic lusting for societies that never existed the way you claim they existed. And guess what? They will never exist again. So many things have changed that have changed the way humans perceive themselves and their environment. Concepts like
cosmos and a fixed world order (which has never been really fix) are long gone and neither you nor I really do know what they meant to the people who lived during the times when these concepts actually mattered. What you do is romanticising history and as a historian that should be an absolute disgrace for you.
So in a nutshell, you really don't have anything to offer in the intellectual departement. The only thing you could hope for is gathering sympathy as a person.
I have seen a few shady types on different forums who later turned out to be hardcore nazis or "just" racists. At least they knew how they could advertise their cause. They knew that their personalities and hobbies were the only redeeming thing they had going for them and they used that knowledge. You just bump into a forum or comment section and start being an unlikable extremist.
I mean, it was more likely to become a communist because of ADF's "argumentational skills" (back in the day), than to become whatever you think you are, an "anti-modernist, anti-feminist, anti-liberal, anti-MRA, anti-seduction pro-patriarchy/reactionary", I know (is it just me or is this entire desciption just really "tumblresque"?)
Tl;dr: You are doing a horrible job advertising your ideology.
, but various tidbits of my personal info can't, due to mentally ill losers like you.
Why not? Do you think I'd be able to track you down when you post in some forum about Grimes? It is not that hard to keep a low profile, you know. Just cut your rants about rape and what women allegedly want and I will never be able find you.
Your musical or cineastic preferences don't give away who you are, it is all the other things you are so eager to share with people.
Did Holden ever provide you his "list" of everything that was wrong with your article? He never posted it in the thread by null.
[...] Did he ever give you a list, or just say "everything is wrong, just cuz, so fix it."
Unsurprisingly, he didn't. And I doubt if
I will ever receive one.
I've asked him multiple times to correct the summary of his dating life because he claims I have too many women in it; but when I ask him which ones to combine, he just relinks me his blog like a turdflower
Oh, just give me a bit more time, then I'll have quite the treat for you. I promise!
i have more of a problem with null's claims.[...]i don't have a problem with his [i.e. my, Ceph's] claims (which are often wrong as well)
Well, then just send Null your list and he will act just as he said he would. If one single thing in my article isn't backed by anything you did or said, I will have to delete it.
the hell are fake internet profiles?
Shit like this, Marijan Škugor Šiklić.
@Holden likes submissive girls
aka girls that doesnt kick his ass, i see why he want to fuck 12 years old girl
It should be worth noting that we know from the last thread that Holden expects his girlfriend to fuck an animal while he videotapes it in order to have something he can use against her if she ever decides to leave him. So submission isn't enough, she has to provide him with the means of blackmailing her.
I also do love the rant against the "modern Catholic church" in juxtaposition with mentioning BDSM. As if sexual submissiveness is the same as what he perceives as living a more traditional life. As if sexually submissive women (or generally people who prefer being submissive in bed) will ever put up with Marijan's bullshit*.
And as if more traditionally orientated women will not beat the shit out of him, once they discover what he thinks "traditionalism" means.
*By the way, this is an excellent example of Marijan's warped views on relationship. Submissiveness in bed automatically means submissiveness (to the point of completely surrendering one's autonomy to another person it seems) in real life, There is no difference between a couple's everday life/social life/etc. and a couple's sex life.
PS: Sorry for the lengthy post, my fellow Kiwis. My 'tism got the better of me.
